JUDGMENT :

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J.

1. Challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent vide Rc. No. 1582/2023/Magl-SA, dated 26.08.2023, against the detenu namely Ruthala Bodakonda @ Nani S/o Nookaraju, basing on the five crimes registered against the detenu in various police stations and the consequential confirmation order passed by the 1st respondent vide G.O. Rt. No. 1786, General Administration (SC-I) Department, dated 05.09.2023, the detenu’s wife filed the present writ petition.

2. Heard Sri A.V. Pardhasaradhi, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader representing the office of the learned Additional Advocate General.

3. Learned Special Government Pleader representing the office of the learned Additional Advocate General filed counter and opposed the writ petition.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner assails the detention order on two main grounds. Firstly that, out of five crimes which have been taken into consideration for ordering detention order, the detenu was granted bail in respect of four crimes and the said fact was admitted in the counter of the respondents. He would further submit that the sponsoring authority has not placed the material