SUNIL B. SHUKRE, A. S. CHANDURKAR, AVINASH G. GHAROTE
Sonali Power Equipment – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. referral regarding application of law of limitation in msmed act (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by appellants and respondents (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. relevant legislative provisions and interpretations (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's analysis on limitation in arbitration and conciliation (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. conclusions on the application of limitation act (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. final verdict and request for further proceedings (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER :
Avinash G. Gharote, J. - Heard Mr. S.P. Dhole, learned counsel for the appellants in all appeals except Appeal No.5/2018, Mr. M.P. Khajanchi, learned counsel for the appellant in Appeal No.5/2018 and Mr. S.V. Purohit, learned counsel for the respondents in all appeals.
2. This is a reference made by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the request of the learned Division Bench (B. P. Dharmadhikari & Z. A. Haq, JJ.) in Commercial Appeal No.1/2018 [M/s. Sonali Power Equipment through its Managing Director v. Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Mumbai and others and other connected matters] by the judgment dated 24/08/2018, being unable to agree with the view taken by another learned Divi
Andhra Pradesh Power Co-ordination Committee v. M/s. Lanco Kondapalli Power Limited
Anil Kumar Neotia v. Union of India
Aswini Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Bose
B. K. Educational Services Private Limited v. Parag Gupta and Associates
Babulal Vardharji Gurjar v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries (P) Ltd.
Bhogilal Chunilal Pandya v. State of Bombay
Bibi Sayeeda v. State of Bihar
Director of Industries, U.P. v. Deep Chand Agarwal
Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited v. Mahakali Foods Private Limited (Unit 2)
Hansraj Gupta v. Dehra Dun-Mussoorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd.
J. Kumaradasan Nair v. Iric Sohan
K. Prabhakaran v. P. Jayarajan
Khadi Gram Udyog Trust v. Ram Chandraji Virajman Mandir
M. Siddiq (Ram Janmabhumi Temple v. Suresh Das
M.P. Steel Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd. v. Assam State Electricity Board
Modern Industries v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi
Nav Rattanmal v. State of Rajasthan
New Delhi Municipal Committee v. Kalu Ram
Pundlik Jalam Patil v. Jalgaon Medium Project
Punjab National Bank v. Surendra Prasad Sinha, 1993 Supp (1) SCC 499
Sagar Sharma v. Phoenix Arc (P) Ltd.
Silpi Industries v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
Snehadeep Structures (P) Ltd. v. Maharashtra Small-Scale Industries Development Corpn. Ltd.
South Central Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Employees Union v. B. Yashodabai
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Today Homes and Infrastructure Private Limited
Sri Paravathi Parmeshwar Cables v. A.P. Transmission Corporation Ltd.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Narender
State of Goa v. Western Builders
State of Kerala v. V. R. Kalliyanikutty
State of Rajasthan v. Swaika Properties
State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Shyam Sundar
Suganthi Suresh Kumar v. Jagdeeshan
Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra
Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs to Govt. of W.B. v. Abani Maity
The Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to conciliation proceedings under the MSMED Act; however, it applies to arbitration proceedings, preventing stale claims from being raised under the Act.
The Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to conciliation proceedings under the MSMED Act but applies to arbitration under its provisions; time-barred claims can be settled through conciliation.
The MSMED Act, 2006 applies only to delayed payments to Micro and Small Enterprises, and it does not contemplate an independent claim by the Buyer against the Supplier.
If any registration under the MSMED Act is obtained, the same will be prospective and would apply to supply of goods and services subsequent to registration but cannot operate retrospectively. Accord....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Facilitation Council has the jurisdiction to act as an Arbitrator after the failure of conciliation proceedings under the MSME Act. The ri....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.