J.B. Pardiwala, J.

1. Since the issues raised in the above captioned bunch of the writ applications are more or less the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. The following are the observations made by the Supreme Court, speaking through His Lordship Dipak Mishra, J., in a very recent pronouncement in the case of State of Jharkhand and another vs. Harihar Yadav and others [2014 (2) SCC 114]:

"How does a constitutional court respond to a situation when a human problem of great magnitude frescoed on constitutional canvas gets painfully projected with intense sincerity, possibly realizing pain is one of the "sovereign masters of mankind"? How is the Court required to react in law when the workmen are forced to grapple with a colossal predicament of sense of belonging due to a situation created making them feel that they are neither here nor there? We consider