ANIL K.NARENDRAN, K.BABU
T. P. Gireeshbabu, S/o. Balakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Jameela – Respondent
ORDER :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner is the 1st respondent-tenant in R.C.P.No.71 of 2016 on the file of the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Vatakara and the appellant in R.C.A.No.66 of 2018 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Additional District Judge), Vatakara. The landlords, namely, Shri. Kuzhichalil Abdurahiman and his wife Smt. Jameela (1st respondent herein) filed R.C.P.No.71 of 2016 before the Rent Control Court, under Section 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, seeking eviction of the tenant from the petition schedule shop room covered by Ext.A1 kachit dated 02.12.2000. The bona fide need projected in the Rent Control Petition, in order to seek an order of eviction under Section 11(3) of the Act, was that of Shri. Kuzhichalil Abdurahiman and his wife Smt. Jameela for starting jewellery business in the petition schedule shop room and also the adjacent shop room. In the Rent Control Petition, an order of eviction was also sought for under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act, on the ground that the tenant transferred possession of the petition schedule shop room to the 2nd respondent herein; the alleged sub-tenant, withou
A.V. Kammath v. Chandran 1989 (1) KLT 473
Ammeer Hamsa v. Ramabhadran and another [2019 (2) KHC 465]
Ammu v. Nafeesa [2015 (5) KHC 718]
Adil Jamshed Frenchman v. Sardur Dastur Schools Trust [(2005) 2 SCC 476]
Bharath Sales Ltd. v. Life Insurance Corporation of India [(1998) 3 SCC 1]
Celina Coelho Pereira v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar [(2010) 1 SCC 217]
Deena Nath v. Pooran Lal [(2001) 5 SCC 705]
Gaya Prasad v. Pradeep Srivastava [(2001) 2 SCC 604]
G.C. Kapoor v. Nand Kumar Bhasin [(2002) 1 SCC 610]
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Dilbahar Singh [(2014) 9 SCC 78]
Hasmat Rai v. Reghunath Prasad [(1981) 3 SCC 103]
Ismail v. Kesavan [2004 (2) KLT 56]
Jacob v. Pradeep Naik [2009 (2) KHC 53]
Kamleshwar Prasad v. Pradumanju Agarwal [(1997) 4 SCC 413]
Kedar Nath Agrawal v. Dhanraji Devi [(2004) 8 SCC 76]
M.L. Prabhakar v. Rajiv Singal [(2001) 2 SCC 355]
Maganlal Kishanlal Godha v. Nanasaheb Uddhaorao Gadewar [(2008) 13 SCC 758]
Narayanan Nair v. Pachumma [1980 KLT 430]
Om Prakash Gupta v. Ranbir B. Goyal [(2002) 2 SCC 256]
Pukhraj Jain v. Padma Kashyap [(1990) 2 SCC 431]
Phool Rani v. Naubat Rai Ahluwalia [(1973) 1 SCC 688]
Prasannan v. Haris [2005 (2) KLT 365]
Pratap Rai Tanwani v. Uttam Chand [(2004) 8 SCC 490]
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu v. Motor and General Traders [(1975) 1 SCC 770]
Rukmini Amma Saradamma v. Kallyani Sulochana [(1993) 1 SCC 499]
Ram Narain Arora v. Asha Rani [(1999) 1 SCC 141]
Shakuntala Bai v. Narayan Das [(2004) 5 SCC 772]
Shantilal Thakordas v. Chimanlal Maganlal Telwala [(1976) 4 SCC 417]
Sheshambal (dead) through LRs. v. Chelur Corporation
Shiv Samp Gupta v. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta [(1999) 6 SCC 222]
Sait Nagee Purushotham and Co. Ltd. v. Vimalabai Prabhulal [2005 (8) SCC 252]
T. Sivasubramaniam v. Kasinath Pujari [(1999) 7 SCC 275]
Thankamony Amma v. Omana Amma [AIR 2019 SC 3803 : 2019 (4) KHC 412]
Tellicherry W. Co-operative Society v. Safiya Beebi Umma [2002 (3) KLT 863]
Unni Vacco v. Thankamma Gregory [2003 (2) KLT 459]
Usman K.S. v. Vidyavathi @ Vidya Kalesan and others [2014 (1) KHC 830]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.