SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1111

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
R. Prema Latha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to Government Higher Education Department – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.P.Chandrasekar
For the Respondent:Mr. D. Ravi Chander, Special Government Pleader Assisted by, Mr. C. Jayaprakash, Government Advocate, Mr. M. Palanimuthu, Mr. S. Rajesh Government Advocate, Mr. K.V. Sundararajan, Mr. V. M. Nagarajan, Mr. M.A. Gouthaman, Mr. G. Sankaran, Mr. N. R. Anantharam Krishnan, Mr. M. Ravi, Mr. R. Bharanidharan Mrs. G. Thilagavathi For, Mr. R. Gopinath, Mr. M. Gnanasekar, Mr. A. Ajoy Khose, Mr. R.M.D. Nasrullah, Mr. N. Alagurnarayanan For M/s. RRN Legal, Mr. A.S. Balaji and, Mr. M. Jothikumar Mrs. Selvi George, Mr. T. Sundaravadhanan

Table of Content
1. importance of integrity in public appointments (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. factual basis for petitions against appointments (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. irregularities in the appointment process (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. locus standi of unsuccessful candidates (Para 13 , 14)
5. arguments of petitioners and respondents (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. administering the recruitment notifications (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
7. findings of the administrator and its implications (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
8. role of the director of collegiate education (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
9. issues with previous appointments based on evaluation (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
10. legal principles regarding the appointment process (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
11. duty of state authorities in selection integrity (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
12. assessing the consequences of selection process integrity (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
13. judicial review of procedural issues in selection (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53)
14. consequences of large-scale corruption and irregularities (Para 54 , 55 , 56)
15. internal discrepancies in selection committee reports (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
16. legal implications of findings and conclusion

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                          whatsapp-icon Back to top