Back
G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
IMT Industrial Association – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. G.S.Sandhawalia, J.
The present judgment shall dispose of 9 cases i.e. CWP Nos. 26573, 24967, 25037, 25539 and 25988 of 2021 and CWP Nos.584, 1404, 3860 and 1698 of 2022. Facts have been taken from CWP-26573-2021, IMT Industrial Association and another v. State of Haryana and another, CWP No. 24967 of 2022, Faridabad Industries Association v. State of Haryana and another and CWP-1698-2022, Akhilesh Leekha v. State of Haryana and another since purely a legal question is involved in this batch of cases regarding the virus of The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 (in short 'the 2020 Act') and whether the same is unconstitutional and violative of Part-III of the Constitution of India.
2. The petitioners' Association is stated to be duly registered under the provisions of Haryana Registration & Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 comprising of allottees of industrial plots/sites at Industrial Model Township, Tehsil Manesar, District Gurugram who are carrying on their industrial and business activities in the State of Haryana. The resolutions in favour of the authorized representatives have been duly appended.
3. The petitioners lay challenge to 'the 2020 A
The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 is unconstitutional for imposing domicile-based employment restrictions, violating Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution, and lacking legis....
Article 16 of Constitution of India talks about equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.
(1) 100% reservation provided for local residents of concerned Scheduled Districts / Areas only would be violative of Article 16(2) of Constitution of India.(2) Quality of education of school-going c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Government Resolution did not create discrimination as the conditions of service and incidents in private sector were fundamentally differ....
A member of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes in his original State, will not be entitled to the benefits of reservation in the migrated State/Union Territory.When Presidential Orders of Scheduled Ca....
The court ruled that granting bonus marks based on residence violates the principles of equality under Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Constitution.
The court reaffirmed that residence cannot be a basis for discrimination in employment, emphasizing adherence to due process and constitutional mandates in termination cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
