Asha vs State of U.P. - 2025 Supreme(All) 3425

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Madhu Ranjan Pandey
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. bail rights and grounds for defense. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
2. court observations & conditions about bail. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. constitutional rights affecting bail decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 30 , 31 , 32)
4. judicial discretion and bail considerations. (Para 12 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. final conclusions on bail applications. (Para 101 , 103 , 105)

JUDGMENT :

AJAY BHANOT, J.

1. The judgment is being structured in the following conceptual framework to facilitate the discussion:

Introduction

Issue arising for consideration

III

Submissions of learned counsels for the parties

Bail: Grounds for grant/denial of bail

Constitutional law and bails

Fair trial and Defence of an accused

VII

Defence of an accused & Bail:

A	Accused and the criminal justice system
B	Criminal investigations and defence evidence
C	Section 313 Cr.P.C. (Section 351 BNSS), Section 233 Cr.P.C. (Section 256 BNSS) and the accused
D	Realizing the rights of defence and bails
E	Grant of bail for defence : Case Laws

VIII

Conclusions: Parameters for grant of bail to prepare and conduct defence

Post Script:

A	Supreme Court judgement in Irfan v. State of U.P.
B	Noise
C	Constitutional Dialogues & Comity of Constitutional Courts