SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3425

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ajay Bhanot, J.
Asha – Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.-13193 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 19170 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 16313 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 12136 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 18831 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 17134 of 2025 , Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 13551 of 2025 , Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 14246 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 14453 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 9600 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 26735 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 11558 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 14785 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 6702 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 11032 of 2025 , Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 15795 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 11724 of 2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.- 8473 of 2025
Decided On : 14-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Madhu Ranjan Pandey
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

The right to bail for gathering defence evidence is crucial to ensuring a fair trial under Article 21, particularly after prosecution evidence is concluded or nearing conclusion.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Criminal Procedure Code - Sections 313 and 233 - Bail application - The court discussed the parameters for granting bail to enable the accused to gather defence evidence and prepare for trial. The court emphasized that such bail is aligned with the fundamental right to a fair trial under Article 21 and is particularly critical when prosecution evidence is complete or nearly complete. Factors like the potential to influence witnesses, the severity of charges, and the socio-economic status of the accused are vital in evaluating bail applications for defence. (Paras 1, 3, 83, 89, 98)

(B) Judicial discretion in bail matters - The court affirmed that bail is a judicial discretion exercised judiciously, where mere technicality should not compromise justice. It is vital to ensure that the accused can defend themselves effectively without dilatory tactics. (Paras 7, 12, 57, 95)

(C) Grounds for bail - Denial of bail on grounds of defence without reasonable cause could impede justice. Proper pleading and substantiation of reasons in applications for bail are essential, ensuring adherence to the principles laid down in prior cases, reinforcing the idea that the right to bail should not merely serve the interests of the prosecution. (Paras 91, 92, 103)

(D) Cases cited include: Emperor Vs H.L. Hutchinson, Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia, and others reinforcing right to fair trial and effective defence. (E) Order: Bail granted with conditions for non-interference with trial proceedings.

Table of Content
1. bail rights and grounds for defense. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
2. court observations & conditions about bail. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. constitutional rights affecting bail decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 30 , 31 , 32)
4. judicial discretion and bail considerations. (Para 12 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. final conclusions on bail applications. (Para 101 , 103 , 105)

JUDGMENT :

AJAY BHANOT, J.

1. The judgment is being structured in the following conceptual framework to facilitate the discussion:

IIntroduction
IIIssue arising for consideration
IIISubmissions of learned counsels for the parties
IVBail: Grounds for grant/denial of bail
VConstitutional law and bails
VIFair trial and Defence of an accused
VII

Defence of an accused & Bail:

AAccused and the criminal justice system
BCriminal investigations and defence evidence
CSection 313 Cr.P.C. (Section 351 BNSS), Section 233 Cr.P.C. (Section 256 BNSS) and the accused
DRealizing the rights of defence and bails
EGrant of bail for defence : Case
Laws
VIIIConclusions: Parameters for grant of bail to prepare and conduct defence
IX

Post Script:

ASupreme Court judgement in Irfan v. State of U.P.
BNoise
CConstitutional Dialogues & Comity of Constitutional Courts
XOrder on bail application

I. Introduction:

2. In this bail application and all companion bail applications prosecution evidence is near conclusion or has closed. Proceedings under Section 313 Cr.P.C. will be shortly set in motion, and thereafter defence evidence will be received. These are second bail applications. In all bail applications the primary ground for grant of bail is to conduct effective defence of the case.

II. Issue arising for consideration:

3. The issue that has arisen for consideration in this bail application and the connected bail applications is whether gathering of defence evidence, preparation of defence strategy and effectively prosecuting the defence case in a trial can be a ground for granting bail? If the answer is in the affirmative, what are the parameters on which the bail can be granted for framing a defence strategy, collecting defence evidence and conduct of defence and at what stage?

4. Heard Shri N.I. Jafri, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Sadrul Islam Jafri, learned counsel, Shri Dharmendra Singhal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Shivendra Singhal, learned counsel, Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel, Shri Sheshadri Trivedi, learned counsel, Shri Vikrant Rana, learned counsel, Shri Madhu Ranjan Pandey, learned counsel, Shri Irshad Ahmad, learned counsel, Shri Aishwarya Pratap Singh, learned counsel assisted by Shri Amiruddin Siddique, learned counsel, Shri Tripurari Pal, learned counsel, Shri M.P. Srivastava, learned counsel, Shri Shailesh Pandey, learned counsel, Shri Mohit Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel, Shri Shashi Kumar Mishra, learned counsel, Shri Nasiruzzaman, learned counsel, Shri Gireesh Chandra Sharma, learned counsel, Shri Yadvendra Dwivedi, learned counsel, Shri Rahul Saxena, learned counsel, Shri Bharat Singh, learned counsel, Shri Sandeep Pandey, learned counsel, Shri Narendra Singh, learned counsel, Shri Azhar Hussain, learned counsel, Shri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel, Shri Saket Jaiswal, learned counsel and Shri Samrat Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the applicants.

Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant (as Hon’ble Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J. then was) has since been elevated to the Bench of this Court.

4.1. Shri Ashok Mehta, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, learned A.G.A.-I and Shri Chandan Agrawal, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.

III. Submissions of learned counsels for the parties:

5. The hearings on the common legal issue arising in all the companion bail applications happened on various dates. Learned counsels for the applicants in all matters have made the following submissions on the common legal issue that has arisen for consideration:

I. The right of bail is sourced to statute, however, it has deep roots in Ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top