Back
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, SHAMEEM AKTHER
Hyderabad Potteries Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Debbad Visweswara Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of previous specific performance suit (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants' claims concerning property ownership (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform (Para 8 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. trial court findings on evidence (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. litigation context in relation to ownership (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. plaintiff's possession and investment in property (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. amendment of specific relief act applies to pending cases (Para 59 , 60 , 61) |
JUDGMENT :
(A. Rajasheker Reddy)
A.S.No.998 of 2010
1. This Appeal Suit is filed against judgment and decree dated 12.11.2010 in O.S.No.88 of 2002 wherein and whereby the trial Court dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the respondents/defendants for specific performance in respect of agreement of sales dated 26.03.1997 and 27.03.1997.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.
It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendants 1 to 4 are the owners of the agricultural land admeasuring Acs.141.05 gts in Sy.Nos.300 to 309 in Budwel Village, Rajendernagar Mandal (for short ‘the suit schedule property’). The suit schedule property
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
