IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.
Kurapati Bangaraiah - Appellants
Vs.
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
W.P. Nos. 4205 of 2013 and 7543 of 2014
Decided On : 27.06.2014
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 243-Q – A.P. Gram Panchayat (declaration of villages) Rules, 2007 – Rules 9 and 12(2) – Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994- Sections 2(17), 3(2)(f) and 3(2) – Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 – Section 389-A – Andhra Pradesh Transitional Area and Smaller urban Areas (Fixation of criteria) Rules, 2013 – Institutions of self-government – MGNREGA scheme – resolution – Gram panchayats – Electoral process – seeking to conduct elections for the posts of Chairman, Mandal Parishad, Dubbaka the members of the MPTCs in Dubbaka Mandal, the ZPTC, of Dubbaka and Chairman, Zilla Parishad, Medak District, while leaving out the Dubbaka, Dharmajipet, Latchapet, Chervapur, Dumpalapally, Chellapur and Mallaipally MPTCs from the present electoral process, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional – Member of the Legislative Assembly, Dubbaka, ("M.L.A) requested the Minister for Municipal Administration, vide his letter dated 31.01.2012, to propose creation of a new Municipality at Dubbaka in view of the long pending demand from the public in his constituency. He enclosed thereto, a brief note submitted by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet for creation of a new Municipality in Dubbaka town and mandal. The Government, vide letter, informed the M.L.A. that the proposal for creation of Dubbaka Municipality would be considered in the next phase, as the pre-election process i.e., identification of B.C. voters in all the urban bodies had already started – Meanwhile the Minister for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, vide U.O. requested the Secretary, Municipal Administration to circulate the file regarding upgradation of Dubaka Gram panchayat as a Nagar Panchayat – Held, All that is required is for any of the parties to bring the fact of disposal of the main Writ Petition to the notice of the Division bench and request it to dismiss the Writ Appeal as in fructuous – Mere pendency of W.A. No. 432 of 2012 would not bar this Court from hearing and adjudicating the main Writ Petition – Neither has any statutory provision, nor any binding precedent, been shown to this Court which would require it to refrain from hearing a Writ Petition finally, merely because the Writ Appeal preferred against the interlocutory order passed earlier in the very same Writ Petition, or for grant of the interim order sought for in the Writ Petition, is pending adjudication before the Division Bench – petitioners cannot be denied relief taking subsequent events into consideration, more so as the impugned G.Os. were issued in flagrant violation of the statutory rules, and the very existence of the gram panchayats were brought an end at the mere whims and fancies of the government. Larger public interest would require this Courts intervention to ensure observance of the rule of law by the executive while denotifying gram panchayats - which are institutions of self-government under Part IX of the Constitution – Impugned G.Os. must be, and are accordingly, set aside – As a result the subject Gram Panchayats, which were denotified by G.O.Ms. No. 33 dated 31.01.2013, shall stand revived – It is made clear that this order shall not preclude the State Government, if it so chooses, from taking action afresh, for constitution of a Nagar Panchayat, strictly in accordance with law. As the subject Gram Panchayats now stand revived, and the Dubbaka Nagar Panchayat ceases to remain in existence, the question of conducting elections to the Dubbaka Nagar Panchayat would not arise. With regards conduct of elections to the posts of M.P.T.C. in Dubbaka Mandal and other offices, I have no reason to doubt that the State Election Commission will take necessary action in accordance with law – Writ Petitions disposed.
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.
1. W.P. No. 4205 of 2013 is filed by 18 individuals questioning the action of the respondents in constituting Dubbaka Nagar Panchayat, with Dubbaka, Dharmajipet, Lachapet, Chervapur, Dumpalapally, Chellapur and Mallaipally Grampanchayat of Medak District, as illegal and unconstitutional. W.P. No. 7543 of 2014 is filed by five individuals questioning the action of the respondents in seeking to conduct elections for the posts of Chairman, Mandal Parishad, Dubbaka the members of the MPTCs in Dubbaka Mandal, the ZPTC, of Dubbaka and Chairman, Zilla Parishad, Medak District, while leaving out the Dubbaka, Dharmajipet, Latchapet, Chervapur, Dumpalapally, Chellapur and Mallaipally MPTCs from the present electoral process, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.
2. Facts, to the extent relevant, are that the Member of the Legislative Assembly, Dubbaka, ("M.L.A." for short) requested the Minister for Municipal Administration, vide his letter dated 31.01.2012, to propose creation of a new Municipality at Dubbaka in view of the long pending demand from the public in his constituency. He enclosed thereto, a brief note submitted by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet for creation of a new Municipality in Dubbaka town and mandal. The Government, vide letter dated 11.04.2012, informed the M.L.A. that the proposal for creation of Dubbaka Municipality would be considered in the next phase, as the pre-election process i.e., identification of B.C. voters in all the urban bodies had already started. The MLA again addressed letter dated 03.11.2012 to the District Collector, Medak informing him that a proposal, for creation of Dubaka Municipality, had been submitted to the Government under the Indiramma Bata programme which was held at Dubbaka on 29.10.2012; the Government should consider creation of Dubbaka as a Municipality so that the on going development works, weaker section houses etc., may be taken up; and the subject villages had no objection to merge themselves to constitute Dubbaka Municipality. Along with his letter dated 03.11.2012, the M.L.A. enclosed the alleged agreements of 12 Gram panchayats to merge their villages for creation of Dubbaka as a Municipality. The M.L.A. requested the District Collector to recommend, creation of Dubbaka as a Municipality, to the government at the earliest.
3. In the meanwhile the Minister for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, vide U.O. note dated 01.01.2013, requested the Secretary, Municipal Administration to circulate the file regarding upgradation of Dubaka Gram panchayat as a Nagar panchayat. The Secretary to the Government MA & UD, vide memo dated 08.01.2013, forwarded a copy of the letter of the MLA dated 31.01.2012 to the Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, and informed him that the Government had agreed, in principle, to consider constitution of Dubbaka Gram panchayat as a Municipality subject to fulfilment of the parameters required for constitution of a Nagar panchayat/Municipality. The Commissioner was requested to send proposals, duly examining the parameters required for constituting a Nagar Panchayat/Municipality.
4. The Special Secretary to the Government vide memo dated 15.01.2013, while drawing his attention to the letter of the M.L.A. dated 31.01.2012 and the memo of the Secretary dated 08.01.2013, requested the Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration to expedite the proposal for further action to be taken in the matter. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, vide letter dated 17.01.2013, informed the District Collector that a representation was submitted by the Dubbaka M.L.A. on 31.01.2012; the Government had agreed, in principle, to consider constitution of Dubbaka Grampanchayat as a Municipality subject to fulfillment of the parameters; proposals for constituting it as a Nagar panchayat/Municipality should be sent; and the particulars, as required under the Andhra Pradesh Transitional Area and S
Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal AIR 1955 SC 425.
Sharif-ud-Din v. Abdul Gani Lone AIR 1980 SC 303.
Chandrika Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar AIR 2004 SC 2036.
Deen Maurya (Dr.) v. State of U.P. (2009) 6 SCC 735).
Karnal Leather Karamchari Sanghatan v. Liberty Footwear Company AIR 1990 SC 247.
Bhikraj Jaipuria v. Union of India AIR 1962 SC 113.
Sarla Goel v. Kishan Chand (2009) 7 SCC 658.
Mohan Singh v. International Airport Authority of India 1997 (9) SCC 132.
State of U.P. v. Manbodhan Lal Srivastava 1958 SCR 533 : AIR 1957 SC 912.
State of M.P. v. Pradeep Kumar (2000) 7 SCC 372.
Govindlal Chhaganlal Patel v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee AIR 1976 SC 263.
State of Mysore v. V.K. Kangan (1976) 2 SCC 895 : AIR 1975 SC 2190).
State of U.P. v. Babu Ram Upadhya (1961) 2 SCR 679 : AIR 1961 SC 751.
Dattatraya Moreshwar v. State of Bombay AIR 1952 SC 181.
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Board
V.K. Kangan (1976) 2 SCC 895 : AIR 1975 SC 2190.
State of W.B. v. Union of India (1964) 1 SCR 371 : AIR 1963 SC 1241.
State of W.B. v. Union of India AIR 1965 SC 895.
R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka (1992) 1 SCC 335.
Manik Lal Majumdar v. Gouranga Chandra Dey (2005) 2 SCC 400).
Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. (1996) 1 SCC 642.
Shashikant Laxman Kale v. Union of India (1990) 4 SCC 366.
Ambedkar. (Bhanumati v. State of U.P.
Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches Association v. Government of A.P. 2004 (1) ALT 659 (LB).
State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Bose 1954 SCR 587.
M.K. Ranganathan v. Govt. of Madras (1955) 2 SCR 374 : AIR 1955 SC 604.
Chern Taong Shang v. Commander S.D. Baijal (1988) 1 SCC 507).
A. Thangal Kunju Musaliar v. M. Venkitachalam Potti AIR 1956 SC 246.
State of West Bengal v. Union of India (1964) 1 SCR 371 : AIR 1963 SC 1241.
Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India
Doypack Systems (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (1988) 2 SCC 299.
K.P. Varghese v. ITO AIR 1981 SC 1922.
Lalit Mohan Pandey v. Pooran Singh (2004) 6 SCC 626.
State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala
Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products v. Union of India
S. Sundaram Pillai v. V.R. Pattabiraman (1985) 1 SCC 591.
Abdul Jabar Butt v. State of Jammu & Kashmir AIR 1957 SC 281.
CIT v. Indo Mercantile Bank Ltd. AIR 1959 SC 713.
Ram Narain Sons Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (1955) 2 SCR 483 : AIR 1955 SC 765.
State of Punjab v. Kailash Nath (1989) 1 SCC 321.
Madras & Southern Mahratta Railway Company Ltd. v. Bezwada Municipality (1944) 71 IA 113
Holani Auto Links (P) Ltd. v. State of M.P. (2008) 13 SCC 185.
Haryana State Coop. Land Development Bank Ltd. v. Banks Employees Union (2004) 1 SCC 574.
Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd. v. Corpn. of Calcutt AIR 1965 SC 1728.
Tribhovandas Haribhai Tamboli v. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal AIR 1991 SC 1538.
Kerala State Housing Board v. Ramapriya Hotels (P) Ltd. (1994) 5 SCC 672.
Nagar Palika Nigam v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (2008) 12 SCC 364.
J.K. Industries Ltd. v. Chief Inspector of Factories & Boilers (1996) 6 SCC 665).
Durga Dutt Sharma v. N.P. Laboratories AIR 1965 SC 980.
Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P. AIR 1959 SC 1012.
Kailash Nath Agarwal v. Pradeshiya Industrial & Investment Corpn. of U.P. Ltd.
B.R. Enterprises v. State of U.P.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Hansrajbhai V. Kodala (2001) 5 SCC 175 : AIR 2001 SC 1832.
CIT v. East West Import and Export (P) Ltd.
Ahmedabad (P) Primary Teachers Assn. v. Administrative Officer AIR 2004 SC 1426 : (2004) 1 SCC 755.
Aswini Kumar Ghose v. Arabhinda Bose 1953 SCR 1 : AIR 1952 SC 369.
K. Nagabbushanam v. Collector, Krishana District
DLF Qutab Enclave Complex Educational Charitable Trust v. State of Haryana (2003) 5 SCC 622.
Khub Chand v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1967 SC 1074.
Commissioner of Income-tax v. B.R. Constructions (1993) 202 ITR 222 (AP) (FB).
State of U.P. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. (1991) 4 SCC 139.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur (1989) 1 SCC 101.
Mamleshwar v. Kanahaiya Lal AIR 1975 SC 907.
Morelle v. Wakeling (1955) 2 QB 379.
Distributors (Baroda) P. Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 1985 SC 1585.
M/s. Cloth Traders (P) Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax
Hotel Balaji v. State of A.P. AIR 1993 S.C. 1048 : 1993 Supp (4) SCC 536.
Prasad & Co. v. Superintending Engineer 1995 (3) ALT 537 (DB).
State of A.P. v. P.L. Raju 1996 (1) ALT 144.
Aligarh Muslim University v. Mansoor Ali Khan 2000 (7) SCC 529.
ECIL v. B. Kamnakar (1993) 4 SCC 727.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2003) 5 SCC 376.
K.L. Tripathi v. State Bank of India (1984) 1 SCC 43.
State Bank of Patiala v. S.K. Sharma (1996) 3 SCC 364.
Rajendra Singh v. State of M.P. AIR 1996 SC 2736.
S.L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan AIR 1981 SC 136.
Dhananjaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka (2001) 4 SCC 9.
Ramchandra Murarilal Bhattad v. State of Maharashtra (2007) 2 SCC 588
State of Gujarat v. Shantilal Mangaldas AIR 1969 SC 634.
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Union of India (1990) 3 SCC 223.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597.
General Electric Company v. Renusagar (1987) 4 SCC 137.
Chirala Veera Raghava Reddy v. Chief Secretary, Govt. of A.P.
M.S. Jayaraj v. Commissioner of Excise (2000) 7 SCC 552.
Ghulam Qadir v. Special Tribunal (2002) 1 SCC 33.
Enercon (India) Ltd. v. Enercon GmbH AIR 1962 SC 1044.
D. Venkata Rushi Reddy v. Divisional Panchayat Officer 1996 (1) ALD 76.
Duryodhan v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra
Thammanna v. K. Veera Reddy AIR 1981 SC 116.
Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar (1975) 2 SCC 703 : AIR 1975 SC 2092.
State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta AIR 1952 SC 12.
Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union of India
Peoples Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (1982) 3 SCC 235 : 1982 SCC (L & S) 275.
Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary (1992) 4 SCC 305.
Sheela Barse v. Union of India (1988) 4 SCC 226.
Nagar Rice and Flour Mills v. N. Teekappa Gowda and Bros.
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar Haji Bashir Ahmed
Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima Das
Bangalore Medical Trust v. B.S. Muddappa (1991) 4 SCC 54 : (1991 AIR SCW 2082 : AIR 1991 SC 1902).
Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. v. Machado Brothers (2004) 11 SCC 168.
Kavita Trehan v. Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. (1994) 5 SCC 380.
Pitta Naveen Kumar v. Raja Narasaiah Zangiti (2006) 10 SCC 261.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.