SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 814

2025 DHC 1522
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J.
Airports Authority Of India – Petitioner
Versus
Mumbai International Airport Limited & Anr. – Respondents
O.M.P. (COMM) 185 of 2024
Decided On : 07-03-2025
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Tushar Mehta, Learned SGI with Mr. Karan Lahiri, Mr. Prateek Arora, Ms. Rishieka Ray, Advs.
For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv with Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Rishi Agrawal, Mr. Pratham Vir Agarwal, Mr. Sanjeev Sheshadri, Advs.

The court confirmed that COVID-19 constituted a Force Majeure event impacting the financial obligations under the OMDA, allowing for necessary contractual reliefs and interpreting the agreement in a manner consistent with business efficacy.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Impugned arbitral award - Action against Airports Authority of India for relaxing financial obligations due to COVID-19 classified under Force Majeure - Court upheld tribunal's decision that COVID-19 constituted a legitimate Force Majeure event impacting financials and granting necessary relief. (Paras 1, 2, 80, 109)

(B) The court stated that the learned Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the OMDA and the Force Majeure provisions was coherent, following the intent of the parties and preserving the business efficacy of the agreement. (Para 78)

(C) The claim of a party’s inability to perform due to unforeseen events must be substantiated, and a mere assertion without supporting evidence is insufficient. (Para 86)

(D) Findings established that the pandemic impacted revenue generation, enabling claims under the Force Majeure clause not to be treated as mere burdens, emphasizing the obligation to maintain operations despite financial distress due to external factors. (Paras 107, 131) (E)

Result: Petitioner’s application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. introduction of parties and context of the arbitration (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. factual background of force majeure claim due to covid-19 (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. overview of the challenges against the arbitral award (Para 16)
4. submissions and legal grounds for challenging the award (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
5. arguments in support of the arbitral award (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
6. court's view on the nature of judicial interference (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
7. importance of adhering to business efficacy in contract interpretation (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
8. standard for assessing force majeure in contractual obligations (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
9. details on findings related to force majeure and its evidentiary basis (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73)
10. findings on the excuse of contractual performance due to covid-19 (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80)
11. evaluation of the extension of the contract under force majeure (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85)
12. conclusion on the legitimacy of the arbitral award (Para 86 , 87 , 88 , 89)
13. final ruling and dismissal of the challenge to the award (Para 90)
14. order to dismiss the petition and uphold the award (Para 91)

JUDGMENT :

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J.

S. NoParticulars
A.Preface
B.Factual Matrix
C.Submissions on behalf of Petitioner
D.Submissions on behalf of the MIAL
E.Finding and Analysis

(A) PREFACE:

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') challenging the impugned arbitral award dated 21.12.2023 as corrected under Section 33 of the Act vide order dated 16.01.2024.

2. Airport Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as 'AAI' or 'Petitioner') is a statutory authority established under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, responsible for maintaining and managing civil aviation infrastructure in India.

3. Mumbai International Airport Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'MIAL' or 'Respondent No.1') is a joint venture entity entrusted with the operation, management, and development of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, Mumbai ('CSMIA') under an Operation Management and Development Agreement (hereinafter referred to as 'OMDA') dated 04.04.2006 executed between AAI and MIAL.

4. State Bank of India, (hereinafter referred to as 'SBI' or 'Respondent No.2') a public sector bank and the designated escrow agent under the Escrow Agreement executed as part of the financial arrangement governing the OMDA.

(B) FACTUAL MATRIX:

5. Briefly stated the factual matrix of the case as stated in the present petition is that in March 2020, upon the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent governmental restrictions aviation operations were severely disrupted. Consequently, MIAL issued a Force Majeure notice on 17.03.2020 under Article 16 of the OMDA, claiming that the pandemic constituted a Force Majeure event from 13.03.2020. MIAL sought suspension of its Annual Fee ('AF') obligations, citing an adverse financial impact. The said notice was responded by AAI on 24.03.2020, requesting MIAL to provide a Business Plan reflecting the financial impact of the pandemic. On the same day, MIAL requested AAI to instruct SBI within 24 hours to halt transfers from the Proceeds Account to the AAI Fee Account and instead transfer funds to the Surplus Account for operational expenses. AAI, in its reply dated 25.03.2020, pointed out that MIAL's request for a 24-hour response was inconsistent with the 15-day response period stipulated in the OMDA and sought financial records to substantiate MIAL's force majeure claims.

6. On 26.03.2020, MIAL submitted financial statements showing its fund position and urgent pending payments but failed to provide supporting audited records. AAI, upon review, noted that INR 65 crores a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top