SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1223

B.S.CHAUHAN
MADHO SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S.Chaudhary, Mahesh Bora, R.L.Jangid

Judgment


B. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THE instant writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 13-9-2001 (Annex. 1) passed by the respondent No. 1 under sub-section (8) of Sec. 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the "crpc") appointing respondent No. 3 as a Special Public Prosecutor on the application of respondent No. 2 complainant in a criminal case.

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the petitioners are facing criminal trial for offence punishable under Sec. 302, IPC etc. The respondent No. 2-complainant (brother of the deceased) filed an application before the respondent No. 1 that Public Prosecutor in the Sessions Court would not be able to conduct the trial for being very busy and hence the State should appoint respondent No. 3 as Special Public Prosecutor on his expenses. Respondent No. 1 passed the impugned order dated 13-9-2001 (Annex. 1) appointing respondent No. 3 as a Special Public Prosecutor. Petitioners filed an application before the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur for quashing of the said appointment order dated 13-9-2001 (Annex. 1) but the same has been rejected vide order dated 4-10-2001 (Annex













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top