Mahendra Kumar Jain vs Appellate Rent Tribunal, Ajmer

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1856

SANGEET LODHA, INDERJEET SINGH, MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Mahendra Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Rent Tribunal, Ajmer – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ajeet Kumar Bhandari with, Mr. Jitendra Mishra and Priyansh Jain, Mr. N.K. Maloo, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Mr. Manish Sharma with Mr. Lakshay Pareek, Ms. Shalini Sheoran, Mr. Rajendra Soni with Mr. Vishal Soni, Mr. Hemant Gupta, Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma, Mr. Bipin Gupta, Mr. Rahul Kamwar, Advocates, for the Appellant; Mr. Puru Malik, Ms. Priti Malik Mr. Narendra Malik Mr. Abhinav Sharma Mr. Shehban Naqvi Mr. Rajesh Mehrishi Advocates, for the Respondent

Table of Content
1. maintainability of appeal against single bench's judgment. (Para 1)
2. factual background regarding the landlord-tenant dispute. (Para 2)
3. preliminary objections on maintainability of appeal. (Para 3)
4. arguments regarding jurisdiction under articles 226 and 227. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
5. counsel's advocacy on appealability based on past judgments. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
6. discussion on distinction between tribunal and courts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
7. legal arguments on the nature of rent tribunals. (Para 13 , 14)
8. constitutional provisions empowering high court's supervisory authority. (Para 15 , 16)
9. characteristics of judicial power and its exercise. (Para 17 , 18)
10. powers of the high court in judicial and quasi-judicial matters. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
11. clarifications on the jurisdiction related to property disputes. (Para 22 , 23)
12. hierarchy and jurisdiction of rent control legislation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
13. importance of adhering to legal processes and principles of justice. (Para 27 , 28)
14. conclusion on whether rent tribunals function as courts. (Para 29 , 30)
15. final conclusions on appealability under judicial and supervisory contexts. (Para 31 , 32)
16. reflectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1856

SANGEET LODHA, INDERJEET SINGH, MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYALMahendra Kumar Jain – AppellantVersusAppellate Rent Tribunal, Ajmer – Respondent

Cases Referred (27)

SANGEET LODHA, INDERJEET SINGH, MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Mahendra Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Rent Tribunal, Ajmer – Respondent