SUNITA AGARWAL, ASHUTOSH SHASTRI, HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
DECD Shaikh Ismailbhai Hushainbhai Through Lh. – Appellant
Versus
Vankar Ambalal Dhanabhai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sunita Agarwal, CJ.)
| INDEX | |
| Sr.No. | Particulars |
| 1 | Questions Referred to the Larger Bench |
| 2 | Preface |
| 3 | Framing of the Question of Reference |
| 4 | The issues raised before the Larger Bench |
| 5 | Arguments of second set of learned advocates for the defendants |
| 6 | Arguments of first set of learned advocates for the plaintiffs |
| 7 | Rejoinder by learned advocates of the second set, for the defendants |
| 8 | Stand of the State Government |
| 9 | Analysis |
| 10 | Our Opinion of Concurrence |
| 11 | Dealing with the specific arguments of the first set of learned advocates for the vendee |
| 12 | Effect of Sections 84C,85 and 85A of the Tenancy Act, 1948 |
| 13 | Enforceability of the agreement hit by Section 43 of the Tenancy Act |
| 14 | Object and scope of Order VII, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure |
| 15 | Conclusion |
1. The present reference has been placed before this Bench under an order dated 13.01.2023 passed by the then Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
2. By order dated 13.12.2022 in Second Appeal No. 208 of 2021, the followi
Naranbhai Kanjibhai Gajera versus Vinodbhai Shankarbhai Patel
Abdul Satar Haji Ibrahim vs. Shah Manilal Talakchand
Ashwin Kumar Manilal Shah vs. Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel
Ashwinkumar Manilal Shah vs. Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel
Balu Baburao Zarole versus Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Bhikan
Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Bhanusali (Gajara) dead through LHS.
Ferrodous Estates (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. P. Gopirathnam (Dead)
Firm of Pratapchand Nopaji vs. Firm of Kotrike Venkata Setty & sons and others
Food Corporation of India, Bhopal vs. Babulal Agarwal, Bhopal
G.T.Girish vs. Y. Subba Raju - (2022) 12 SCC 321
Gundaji Satwaji Shinde vs. Ramchandra Bhikaji Joshi
Himatrao ukha Mali & Ors. vs. Popat Devram Patil & Ors
Immani Appa Rao Vs. Gollapalli Ramalingamurthi
Ishverbhai Bhagubhai vs. Special Secretary, Revenue Department
Jayamma vs. Maria Bai (deceased by LRS) and another
Kalyanpur Lime Works Ltd. vs State of Bihar and another
Kedar Nath Motani vs. Prahlad Rai
Laurance Arthur Adamson vs. Melbourne & Metropolitan Board of Works
Mali Amrutlal Becharbhai vs. District Collector, Banaskantha
Mannalal Khetan and others vs. Kedar Nath Khetan and others
Mavji Dhorji and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Mayawanti versus Kaushalya Devei reported in (1990) 3 SCC 1
Mt. Murtazai Begam vs. Dildar Ali
Nagarajan and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors
Narayanamma & Ors. vs.Govindappa and others
P.K.Mohan Ram vs. B.N.Ananthachary
Parmar Kanaksinh Bhagwansinh vs. Makwana Shanabhai Bhikhabhai and Makwana Prabhatbhai Bhikhabhai
Pestonjee Bhicajee Firm vs. Patrick H. Anderson
Pravinbhai Bhailalbhai Gor vs. Rajivkumar Gupta, Collector, Vadodara
Rajenbhai Baldevbhai Shah vs. Baijiben Kabhai Patanvadia & others
Rajes Kanta Roy vs. Shanti Debi
Raman (Dead) by Legal Representatives vs. R. Natarajan
Rameshbhai Chaturbhai Prajapati and others vs. Minaxiben Wd/o of Rasiklal Tilaram and others
Rameshbhai Chaturbhai Prajapati vs. Minaxiben wd/o Rasiklal Tilakram
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. vs. Municipal Board, Rampur
Shah Jitendra Nanalal vs. Patel Lalubhai Ishwarbhai – AIR 1984 GUJ. 145
Sita Ram vs. Radhabai and others
Srimant Chota Raja Saheb Mohitai vs.S. Sundaram Ayyar and others
State of Kerala vs. M.K Kunhikannan Nambiar Manjeri Manikoth, Naduvil
State of Maharashtra vs. Bal Govind Gavate
Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia vs. State of Gujarat and others
Agreements to sell land under the Gujarat Tenancy Act, 1948, without prior Collector approval are invalid and unenforceable, making related suits for specific performance unmaintainable.
An agreement to sell agricultural land without prior permission from the Collector is void and unenforceable under tenancy laws.
When a question arises in a suit for specific performance whether the agreement on which that suit is based is void on the ground that any acquisition made pursuant thereto would contravene or transg....
An agreement to sell is not void ab initio if it is subject to a condition that the seller will obtain the necessary permission from the authorities to convert the land from new tenure to old tenure ....
A suit for specific performance based on an invalid agreement under Section 43 of the Tenancy Act, 1948 is not maintainable.
An agreement to sell agricultural land without prior permission from the Collector is invalid and unenforceable under the Tenancy Act.
Agreements for the sale of new tenure land without prior permission from the Collector are unenforceable under Section 43 of the Tenancy Act, and parties cannot claim relief for illegal agreements.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.