SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 135

SANJAY KAROL, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Confederation of State Government Employees, West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Guddu Singh, Adv. Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Sr. Adv. Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Adv. Mr. Agnibha Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Davesh Vashishtha, Adv. Ms. Kratika Kushwaha, Adv. Mr. Sidesh Kotwal, Adv. Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Kunal Mimani, AOR Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR
For Respondent(s): Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rauf Rahim, Sr. Adv. Mr. Firdous Samim, Adv. Mr. Ali Asghar Rahim, Adv. Ms. Gopa Biswas, Adv. Mr. Mohsin Rahim, Adv. Ms. Tania Tamanna, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR Mr. P S Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Guddu Singh, Adv. Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Sr. Adv. Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Adv. Mr. Agnibha Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Davesh Vashishtha, Adv. Ms. Kratika Kushwaha, Adv. Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Sidesh Kotwal, Adv. Ms. Karuna Nundy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Mr. Shiv Mehrotra, Adv. Ms. Rishika Rishabh, Adv. Ms. Shivangshi Mitra, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Astha Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Bikram Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Chandrashekhar A. Chakalabbi, Adv. Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta, Adv. Mrs. Somsubhra Ganguly, Adv. Ms. Debapriya Mitra, Adv. Ms. Adrita Dey, Adv. Ms. Sinjhoni Chakraborty, Adv. M/s Dharmaprabhas Law Associates, AOR Ms. Karuna Nundy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mehrotra, Adv. Ms. Astha Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KAROL J.

This judgment is divided into the following parts:

INDEX

EXORDIUM

THE CONTROVERSY IN SUMMARIUM

A GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

RoPA Rules

First Memorandum

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL

BEFORE THE HIGH COURT-ROUND ONE

ON REMAND BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL

BEFORE THE HIGH COURT- ROUND TWO

RIVAL CONTENTIONS

A. Submissions on behalf of the Appellant-State

B. Submissions of the Respondents

QUESTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED

ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

Dearness Allowance

Question 1: ARTICLE 309

Questions 2, 3 and 4

Question 5: ARBITRARINESS OF APPELLANT-STATE’S ACTION AND LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION OF ITS EMPLOYEES

Question 6 and 7: CONFLICT, IF ANY, BETWEEN LIST I AND II OF THE VIIth SCHEDULE AND FINANCIAL AUTONOMY OF THE STATE

Question 8: EFFECT OF FINDINGS IN FIRST ROUND OF LITIGATION

Question 9: WHETHER THE RESPONDENTS ARE ENTITLED TO DA TWICE A YEAR?

Question 10: DOES PAUCITY OF FUNDS DEFEAT A LEGAL RIGHT?

Question 11: FISCAL POLICY AND JUDICIAL REVIEW

Question 12: DEARNESS ALLOWANCE - A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT?

Question 13: DELAY AND LATCHES

DIRE

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top