SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1430

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
ANOOP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh, Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra, Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal, Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Vishal Gosain, Mr. Harsh Bora, Mr. Kushdeep Gaur and Ms. Nicy Paulson, Advocates, for Mr. Sushil Ansal
For the Respondents:Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Trideep Pais, Ms. Aakashi Lodha and Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Advocates, Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kinnore Ghosh and Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.

1. The present batch of criminal revision petitions, instituted under the provisions of section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC’), seeks to assail the order framing charges, dated 31.05.2014, rendered by the Court of Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in the case titled as ‘State v. Dinesh Chand Sharma & Ors.’, arising out of the FIR bearing No. 207/2006, registered at Police Station, Tilak Marg (Crime Branch), New Delhi.

2. At the outset, it would be relevant to state that by way of the impugned order dated 31.05.2014, the Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has framed charges against the following persons, for the offences punishable under the provisions of sections 120-B, 109, 201 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to ‘IPC’):

i. Mr. Sushil Ansal

ii. Mr. Gopal Ansal

iii. Mr. Har Swarup Panwar (Mr. H.S. Panwar)

iv. Mr. Dinesh Chand Sharma

v. Mr. Dharam Vir Malhotra (Mr. D.V. Malhotra)

vi. Mr. Prem Prakash Batra (Mr. P.P. Batra)

vii. Mr. Anoop Singh

3. The impugned order dated 31.05.2014 has been sought to be assailed before this Court by, Mr. Sushil A






























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top