ALOK ARADHE, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
IMG Academies Bharata Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Government of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional validity of 2007 act challenged. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner argues legislative competence is lacking. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. state defends enactment citing public interest. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. petitioner disputes state’s claim of legislative competence. (Para 10) |
| 5. court reviews legislative history and context. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. issues surrounding competence of state legislature. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. examining impact on individual versus public interest. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. legal tests for classification and constitutionality. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. court affirms legislative action under scrutiny. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. reaffirmation of legislative authority on annulment. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 11. writ petition dismissed; no costs. (Para 30) |
ORDER :
ALOK ARADHE, J.
(i) FACTS:
The petitioner, a private limited company, in this writ petition has assailed the constitutional validity of the Telangana Government Property (Preservation, Protection and Resumption) Act, 2007. In order to appreciate the petitioner’s grievance, the relevant facts need mention which are stated infra.
2. The petitioner is a company incorporated on 05.08.2003 under the provisi
Ameerunnissa Begum v. Mahboob Begum [(1952) 2 SCC 697 : 1953 SCR 404 : AIR 1953 SC 91
A.P.Dairy Development Corporation Federation vs. B.Narasimha Reddy
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Bhudhan Choudhry v. State of Bihar [(1955) 1 SCR 1045 : AIR 1955 SC 191]
Bimolangshu Roy vs. State of Assam
Chiranjit Lal Choudhuri v. Union of India
Dantuluri Ram Raju vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Constitution Benches of Supreme Court in Ujagar Prints (2) vs. Union of India
Dharam Dutt vs. Union of India
Dwarka Prasad Laxmi Narain v. State of Uttar Pradesh [(1954) SCR 803]
Dhirendra Krishna Mandal v. Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs [(1955) 1 SCR 224].
Habeeb Mohamad v. State of Hyderabad [(1953) SCR 661]
Humanity vs. State of West Bengal
Kedar Nath Bajoria v. State of W.B. [1954 SCR 30 : AIR 1953 SC 404]
Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra [(1952) 1 SCC 215 : (1952) SCR 435]
Kerala State Beverages (M and M) Corporation Limited vs. P.P.Suresh
K.S.Puttuswamy vs. Union of India
Lachmandas Kewalram Ahuja v. State of Bombay [(1952) 1 SCC 726 : (1952) SCR 710]
Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India
Nidhi Kaim vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Offshore Holding Private Limited vs. Bangalore Development Authority
Qasim Razvi v. State of Hyderabad [(1953) SCR 581]
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar [1959 SCR 279 : AIR 1958 SC 538]
Ram Prasad Narayan Sahi v. State of Bihar [1953 SCR 1129 : AIR 1953 SC 215].
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Mcdowell and Company
Shayara Bano vs. Union of India
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Kailash Chand Mahajan
State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara [1951 SCC 860 : (1951) SCR 682]
State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar [(1952) 1 SCC 1 : (1952) SCR 284]
State of Haryana vs. State of Punjab
State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara [1951 SCC 860 : 1951 SCR 682 : AIR 1951 SC 318]
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Kartar Singh
S.M. Syed Mohammad & Company v. State of Andhra [(1954) SCR 1117]
Southern Petrochemical Industries Company Limited vs. Electricity Inspector
The Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited vs. Sipahi Singh
Union of India vs. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon
V.M. Syed Mohammad v. State of Andhra [1954 SCR 1117 : AIR 1954 SC 314]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.