IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, JJ.
Vedanta Limited, Unit: Sterlite Copper, Rep., by its General Manager-Legal, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Tamil Nadu - Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 5756, 5764, 5771, 5772, 5773, 5774, 5776, 5792, 5793, 5801, 21547 of 2019 & W.M.P. Nos. 6575, 6590, 6596, 6598, 6602, 6628, 6630, 6703, 6634 of 2019 & W.M.P.SR No. 102459 of 2019
Decided On : 18-08-2020
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Section 21 - Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Section 25 - Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 - HWM Rules - Rule 6(1)(a)(b) - Hazardous Waste Authorization - Renewal - Report of Inspection - Respondents to furnish copies to petitioner of all Record of Proceedings maintained by Government of Tamil Nadu and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board together with Inspection and Scrutiny Reports pertaining to petitioners plant and operations, including, without limitation, copy of Report of Inspection along with annexures of Joint Chief Environment Engineer, Monitoring, dated for renewal of consents, Scrutiny Report prepared by TNPCB officials after inspection of petitioners Unit inInspection Report dated, for renewal of Hazardous Waste Authorization by Joint Chief Environmental Engineer, Monitoring, Tirunelveli and to furnish the same to petitioner forthwith and record of proceedings - Plant set up by petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of copper cathode, copper rods, sulphuric acid, phosphoric acid and other by-products in process of smelting copper concentrate - Copper rod plant and captive power plant are situated within copper smelter complex of petitioners unit – Held, learned Senior Advocate submitted that this correspondence was between himself and TNPCB during the course of discussions which were held and it is a material shared by client with the counsel and this cannot be relied upon by petitioner and inadvertently same was annexed in paper book filed before Honble Supreme Court and petitioner cannot take advantage of the same - Firstly, Court express out displeasure in the petitioner referring to the said document inspite of fact that respondent has taken a stand that it was inadvertently annexed in the paper book filed before Honble Supreme Court - That apart petitioner can stand in a no better footing by placing reliance on said document - Unfortunately, revenue officials did not probe into matter, did not read conditions of MOU, did not have a thorough discussion with top officials of TNPCB and Court can safely conclude that they have colluded with petitioner by not even issuing a show cause notice to petitioner while issuing notice - Therefore, nothing falls out of reply given by TNPCB to Mr. K.V., learned Senior Advocate and petitioner ought not to have placed reliance on said document - Therefore, all contentions advanced based on said document are eschewed - In fact, in counter affidavit filed by Government in these writ petitions, they have taken a specific stand that petitioner should dismantle and leave State - However, Court find that petitioner has filed a writ petition before Madurai Bench challenging order passed by SIPCOT cancelling allotment of land and an order of interim stay has been granted in said writ petition - Order accordingly.
ORDER :
T.S. Sivagnanam, J.
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in respect of the Impugned Order passed by respondent no.2 vide Proceeding No.T1/TNPCB/F.0212TTN/RL/W&A/2018 dated 12.04.2018 as arbitrary and illegal and quash the same.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in respect of the Impugned Order passed by respondent no.2 vide Proceeding No.T7/TNPCB/F.30921/2012/TTN/A-1 dated 29.03.2013 and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.2 to grant forthwith the Hazardous Waste Authorization to the petitioner in keeping with the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in respect of the Impugned Order passed by the Respondent No.2 vide Proc. No.T1/TNPCB/F.0212TTN/RL/28/W&A/2018 dated 09.04.2018 under Section 25 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (the 'Water Act') and Section 21 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (the 'Air Act') and quash the same and consequently, direct the Respondent No.2 to forthwith issue the Consents to Operate to the petitioner for its copper smelter plant for a period of 5 years, under the Air Act and Water Act.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to furnish copies to the petitioner of all Record of Proceedings maintained by the Government of Tamil Nadu and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board together with the Inspection and Scrutiny Reports pertaining to the petitioner's plant and operations, including, without limitation, the copy of the Report of Inspection along with annexures of the Joint Chief Environment Engineer, Monitoring, Tirunelveli dated 27.02.2018 for renewal of consents, the Scrutiny Report prepared by TNPCB officials after the inspection of the petitioner's Unit in February 2018, the Inspection Report dated 28.02.2018, for renewal of the Hazardous Waste Authorization by the Joint Chief Environmental Engineer, Monitoring, Tirunelveli and to furnish the same to the petitioner forthwith and the record of proceedings (administrative file(s) by whichever name called), in respect of the issuance of the order dated 23.05.2018 passed by the TNPCB, the Respondent No.2 herein and the issuance of the Government of Tamil Nadu Order in G.O.(Ms) No.72 dated 28.05.2018 issued by the State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Environment and Forest, the Respondent No.1 herein.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in respect of the Impugned Order passed by respondent no.2 vide Proceeding No.T7/TNPCB/F.30921/2012/TTN/A-2 dated 29.03.2013 and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in respect of the Impugned Order passed by Respondent No.2 vide Proceeding No.TS1/TNPCB/F.0212/TTN/EB/2018 dated 23.05.2018 and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the immediate restoration of power supply to the petitioner's plant.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the Department of Environment and Forest, the Respondent No.1 herein, vide Government Order G.O.(Ms) No.72 dated 28.05.2018 and the consequential orders being Order No.H2/9992/14 dated 28.05.2018 passed
People's Union for Civil Liberties vs. UOI & Anr.
Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. vs. Union of India
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs. UOI
M.C. Mehta vs. Kamal Nath & Ors.
A.P. Pollution Control Board vs. Prof. M.V. Nayudu
Intellectuals Forum, Tirupathi vs. State of A.P. & Ors.
Tirupur Dyeing Factory Owners Association vs. Noyyal River Ayacutdars Protection Association & Ors.
Chairman, All India Railway Recruitment Board & Anr. vs. K. Shyam Kumar & Ors.
PRP Exports & Ors. vs. Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
U.P. Pollution Control Board vs. Modi Distillery & Ors.
Reliance Life Insurance Company Limited & Anr. vs. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod
Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India vs. UOI & Ors.
Sayyed Ratanbhai Sayeed vs. Shirdi Nagar
Khargram Panchayat Samiti & Anr. vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action & Ors. vs. UoI & Ors.
S.P. Mittal & Ors. vs. UOI & Ors.
Sarvepalli Ramaiah (Dead) & Ors. vs. District Collector, Chittoor
Balco Employees' Union vs. UOI & Ors.
M.P. Oil Extraction & Anr. vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
Shewpujanrai Indrasanrai Ltd vs. Collector of Customs & Others
State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Commercial Tax Officers & Ors.
Raj Kumar Shivhare vs. Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
UOI & Ors. vs. Hindustan Development Corporation
State of Tamil Nadu vs. Hind Stone Etc
K. Ramanathan vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Bharat Iron Works vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel & Ors.
Bharat Forge Company Ltd. vs. Uttam Manohar Nakate
Dhampur Sugar (Kashipur) Ltd. vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors.
Sony Pictures Releasing of India vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
Karnataka Live Band Restaurants Association vs. State of Karnataka
Goa Foundation vs. Sesa Sterlite
Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. vs. MoEF and others
Bangalore Medical Trust vs. BS Mudappa
Virendra Gaur vs. State of Haryana
Research Foundation for Science Technology National Resource Police vs. UOI & Anr.
Ramlila Maidan Incident vs. UOI & Ors.
Vijay Shankar Pandey vs. UOI & Anr.
T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. UOI & Ors.
Kalabharati Advertising vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania & Ors.
National Legal Services Authority vs. UOI & Ors.
Delhi International Airport Limited vs. International Lease Finance Corporation & Ors.
M.R.F. Ltd vs. Manohar Parrikar & Ors.
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala
Gulf Goans Hotels Co. Ltd. & Anr. vs. UOI & Ors.
State of Punjab vs. Bandeep Singh & Ors.
State of Karnataka & Anr. vs. All India Manufacturers Organisation & Ors.
Joydeep Mukharjee vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Daryao & Ors. vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
Amalgamated Coalfields Ltd. vs. Janapada Sabha Cjjomdwara
Lafarge Umiam Mining (P) Ltd. vs. UOI
Besant Nagar Residents vs. MMDA & Ors.
M.C. Mehtha vs. Union of India & Ors.
A.V. Papayya Sastry & Ors. vs. Government of A.P. & Ors.
Research Foundation for Science Department and Industrial Resources Policy vs. UOI & Anr.
Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner
Indian Handicrafts Emporium & Ors. vs. UOI & Ors.
Air India Cabin Crew Assn. & Ors. vs. Yeshaswinee Merchant & Ors.
Direct Recruit Class II Engg. Officers' Association vs. State of Maharashtra
A.V. Papayya Sastry vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Police, Bombay vs. Gordhandas Bhanji
Madhyamic Shiksha Mandal, M.P. v. Abhilash Shiksha Prasar Samiti
Bhavani River – Sakthi Sugars Ltd. vs. Unknown
State of Tamil Nadu vs. State of Kerala and Another
Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. UOI
Bishan Das vs. State of Punjab
Budhan Choudry and others vs. The State of Bihar
Ram Krishna Dalmia vs. Mr. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
Charajit Lal Choowdhuri vs. The Union of India and others
State of Gujarat and another vs. Shri Ambica Mills Limited
Ajit Kumar Nag vs. Indian Oil Corporation
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Girias Investment Private Limited vs. State of Karnataka
Keshab Rao vs. State of West Bengal
First Land Acquisition Collector & Ors. vs. Nirdohi Prakash Ganguli & Anr.
Ajit Kumar Nag vs. G.M.(PJ) I.O.C. Ltd., Haldi & Ors.
Prakash Singh Badal & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab and & Ors.
State of West Bengal Vs. Subodh Gopal Bose & Ors.
H.C. Narayanappa & Ors. Vs. State of Mysore & Ors.
M.C. Mehta and Another vs. Union of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.