Saneh Lata vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 2695

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2695

G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Saneh Lata – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant in LPA-1963 of 2019 :Mr. Gurminder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. RPS Bara, Advocate.
For the Respondent Nos. 4 and 6 in LPA-1928 of 2019:Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.S. Kalra and Mr. Bhagoti Singh, Advocates.
For the Petitioners in CWP-4784 of 2021:Mr. B.S. Rana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nayandeep Rana and Mr. Maninderjit Singh, Advocates.
For the Petitioners in CWP No. 11584 of 2021:Mr. L.K. Narang, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CWP No.21265 of 2021 and For the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 and 30 in LPA No.1963 of 2019:Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in CWP Nos. 1251 and 7649 of 2019: None.
For the Appellant in LPA-1928 of 2019 :Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate.
For the Appellants in LPA-84 of 2020 :Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in CWP-32097 of 2018:Ms. Pratibha Yadav, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CWP No.32594 of 2018:Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CWP Nos.32098 and 32136 of 2018:Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 4-NCTE in CWP-3490 of 2019:Mr. Jaivir Singh for Mr. Ashish Rawal, Advocates and Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shruti Jain Goyal, DAG, Haryana, Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.
For the Respondent No. 10 in LPA-1928 of 2019:Ms. Deepali Verma for Ms. Mehak Sawhney, Advocates.
For the Respondent Nos. 2, 10, 12, 15, 18 to 21 and 25 to 28 in LPA-1963 of 2019:Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1 in LPA No.84 of 2020:Mr. R.S. Kalra and Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocates.
For the Applicant in CM-1714-CWP of 2019 in CWP-428 of 2019 :Mr. S.K.Nehra, Advocate.
For the Respondent Nos. 37 & 38 in LPA-1963 of 2019:Mr. Vibhum for Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocates.
For the Petitioners in CWP Nos.32220 & 37588 of 2018 and CWP Nos.428 and 3490 of 2019:Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate.
For the Applicants in CM-243-LPA of 2020 in LPA-84 of 2020, CM-1714-LPA of 2019 in LPA-428 of 2019 & CM-930-LPA of 2022 in LPA-1963 of 2019 : Ms. Bhawna Cha

JUDGMENT

G.S.Sandhawalia, J. - The present judgment shall dispose of 16 cases out of which, 4 are LPAs i.e. LPA Nos. 1928 and 1963 of 2019 and LPA Nos. 3 and 84 of 2020 and 12 are writ petitions i.e. CWP Nos. 32097, 32098, 32220, 32136 and 37588 of 2018; CWP Nos. 428, 1251, 3490 and 7649 of 2019 and CWP Nos.4784, 11584 and 21265 of 2021.

2. Facts of LPA No. 1928 of 2019 are being referred to, which is filed by the appellants (private respondents in the writ petition) challenging the judgment dated 06.11.2019 and as modified on 18.11.2019 passed in CWP No. 31702 of 2018, Rakesh Kumar and others v. State of Haryana and others whereby, the learned Single Judge, while deciding 56 writ petitions, set aside the notice dated 09.12.2018 (Annexure P-10) and a direction was issued to the State to declare the result afresh by treating the writ petitioners as eligible. Resultantly, it was held that the amendment dated 23.06.2017 was to be applied retrospectively as it was explanatory and, therefore, by virtue of the same, this made the writ petitioners eligible for the 626 posts of PGT (Sanskrit) which had been advertised on 28.06.2015. Vide the application for modification filed on behalf of t