SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 55

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
Dr. T.N. Parameswara Kurup S/o Narayana Pillai – Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Rep. by Secretary Department of Health and Family Welfare – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 19429 of 2014
Decided On : 29-01-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri. S. Sanal Kumar, Smt. Bhavana Velayudhan, Smt. T.J. Seema.
For the Respondents: Sri. Surin George Ipe, Sri. P. Vijayakumar, Sri. Jacob Sebastian.

Headnote:(A) Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3(f) and Rule 85E(2) - Mandamus sought to direct enforcement against the use of plastic containers in homeopathy - Court held that retailers are not to be restricted by manufacturing standards which apply only to manufacturers. (Paras 3-5, 18-20, 26-27)

(B) Public Interest Litigation - Court noted lack of sufficient evidence supporting the assertion of public interest, deeming certain joint participation as personal interest litigation. (Paras 6, 26)

(C) Legislative Intent - Emphasized that the definition of 'manufacture' excludes dispensing of drugs or cosmetics in retail and clinics, which cannot be inferred as manufacturing. (Paras 16-17, 25)

Findings of Court:
The petitioners failed to demonstrate a valid case for enforcing actions against clinics, as the legislative framework is limited to manufacturers of homeopathic medicines.

Issues: Whether the court can obligate state actions against retail entities not specified in the statute, and the true nature of the petitioners' interests.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the statute does not extend to regulating the retail sale practices concerning the use of containers for homeopathic medicines, maintaining that legislation intended restrictions are binding.

Result: Writ petition disposed of without directions to the state for enforcement against clinics.

Table of Content
1. petitioners request for mandamus on plastic containers. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on responsibility of drug manufacturers and education on plastic use. (Para 3 , 6 , 8)
3. legal definitions and distinctions regarding manufacture and dispensing. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
4. insights on statutory interpretation and statutory provisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. court finds no legislative authority for the desired actions. (Para 15 , 16 , 22 , 23)
6. emphasis on reading and construing statute schedules. (Para 17 , 18)
7. clarification on the scope of the 'ejusdem generis' principle. (Para 19 , 20 , 24)
8. conclusion and disposal of the writ petition. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

S. MANIKUMAR, J.

1. Petitioners have sought for a mandamus directing the respondents to take effective measures through its mechanisms, to seize the plastic containers from the manufacturers of homeopathic medicines and from the clinics in the State of Kerala, by conducting a special drive for seizure and prosecute the offenders for violation of the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

2. Petitioners have also sought for a mandamus directing the respondents to educate citizens, by way of advertisement in newspapers, through Public Relations Department and in other visual media, about the adverse effect of using plastic containers for storing homeopathic medicines.

3. Having heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, on 22.01.2021, we ordered thus:

    “3. Inviting the attention of this Court to Rule 85-E (2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Rules, 2006 read with Schedule M1, Mr. Surin George Ipe, learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that, it is for the manufacturers of Homeopathic medicines, not to use plastic containers, and that the said condition cannot be extended to the end users. Referring to Exts.P4 to P6, learned Senior Government Pleader further submitted that instructions issued were only to the Homeopathic manufacturers, to use glass containers, instead of plastic containers, for making medicine and not for the end users.

    4. However, Ext. P5 dated 28.09.2012, letter of the Principal Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare (J) Department, Thiruvananthapuram, addressed to Dr. Shruthi Algundgi, Reg. No. H-440/2009, D-2, Gulmohar Co-op. Hsg. Society, Khadpabandh, Ponda, Goa, shows that, instruction has already been given to the Director of Homeopathy and Managing Director, Kerala State Homeopathic Co-operative Pharmacy Ltd., to use glass containers, instead of plastic containers, for keeping Homeo medicines, by Government letter dated 18.02.2012.

    Mr. Surin George Ipe, learned Senior Government Pleader, is directed to ascertain as to whether the Kerala State Homeopathic Co-operative Pharmacy Ltd. is a manufacturer of Homeopathy medicines. He is also directed to get a copy of the letter dated 21.08.2018, referred to in Ext. P5.”

4. On this day, when the matter came up for further hearing, referring to the certificate of renewal of licence to manufactures for sale of homeopathic medicines, issued by the Drugs Controller and Licensing Authorities, Government of Kerala, respondent No. 2, Mr. Surin George Ipe, learned Senior Government Pleader, submitted that the Kerala State Homeopathic Co-operative Pharmacy Limited is a manufacturer of homeopathic medicines, and that, having regard to the instructions issued earlier, the said manufacturer has been directed to use glass containers, instead of plastic containers, in the process of manufacture.

5. Inviting the attention of this Court to the name of the 2nd writ petitioner - Dr. Shruti Kavlekar, and the name mentioned in Exhibit-P2 document, learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that the note enclosed as Exhibit-P2, suggesting use of glass containers, instead of plastic containers, was written by none other than the 2nd petitioner, namely, Dr. Shruti Kavlekar, who is a manufacturer of glass containers, in the name and style “Shruti Pharmapacs, Pon

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top