SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 273

V.GOPALA GOWDA
SHARADAMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE batches of writ petitions are filed by the owners of agricultural and/or converted lands, house sites, residential/farm houses, companies and builders and others questioning the legality, validity and correctness of the acquisition of vast extent of lands for a development scheme called AEKAVATHI LAYOUT. The main features of the layout, as mentioned in the report of the Engineering Department of the BDA, are: (a) total extent of land required 2750 acres (b) proposed residential sites 28600 (c) civic Amenity sites 50 (d) commercial sites 150 (e) total estimation rs. 933. 47 Crores (f) total amount received rs. 981. 36 Crores (g) saving rs. 47. 89 Crores (h) no. of villages covered 16 (i) no. of applicants 2,32,000 the details of various dimensions of the residential sites, the extent of land used for various purposes such as residential sites, park and play grounds, civic amenities, roads etc. , the amount that would be realised from the sites, the total expenditure to be incurred for the formation of the layout, in question are furnished by the BDA in its report, which is available in the original files produced before this Court.

( 2 ) THE brief facts that gave rise to



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top