Enhance the power of Artificial Intelligence for your legal research, drafting and legal practicing.

India - Madras

M/s.Jothees Spinners(OPC )Pvt Ltd vs Tamilnadu Power Distribution Corporation Ltd

Court allowed installment payment for additional security deposit, conditional on timely payments.

20 Jun 25

India - Madras

D.Swarnakumar vs The Tax Officer-III, Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

A successful bidder must be heard regarding auction confirmations, emphasizing the right to due process in property sales.

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

Vivriti Capital Limited vs Prafful Overseas Private Limited

The court permitted the substitution of parties in arbitration applications based on satisfactory reasons provided in supporting affidavits.

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

P.Muniyasamy vs State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Railway Police Station, Villupuram.

The conviction under Section 162(a) of the Railways Act and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act was unsustainable due to contradictory evidence and lack of corroboratio....

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

K.Inbasekaran vs Mr.Arun Roy, IAS., Secretary to Government, Industries Investment Promotion & Commerce Department

Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to adhere results in contempt, though compliance later may resolve the issue.

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

E.Srinivasan vs The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd.

The court mandated timely consideration of retirement benefit claims, reinforcing procedural compliance by state authorities.

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

Marutham Textiles Private Limited vs The Chairman Cum Managing Director Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO)

The court affirmed that payment of security deposits can be permitted in installments as a reasonable accommodation of financial obligations.

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

M.Arasupandi, Zonal Secretary, Hindu Munnani vs The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City Police, Madurai

The court upheld the need for preliminary arrangements, allowing extensions for vehicle pass applications, thus balancing logistical feasibility with public participation.

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

Jose Hormese vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Meenambakkam Police Station, Chennai

The court determined that there are grounds to investigate theft allegations and quashed the FIR due to procedural errors and lack of sufficient justification.

17 Jun 25

India - Madras

T.A.P.Srirangachari vs The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

Civil court decrees cannot be enforced through writ jurisdiction; further adjudication requires approaching the civil court.

17 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

RAJEEVA M J vs UNION OF INDIA

Pending investigations do not prevent passport renewal unless the court has taken cognizance of the offense.

24 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

ABDUL RAHIMAN vs MAYYADDI

Compounding of offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act leads to disposal of revision petitions.

24 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

AHMEDULLA @AHMAD @ RADO vs Kalasipalya Police

The court upheld the validity of amicable settlements in criminal cases, allowing a petition to quash an FIR based on such a settlement.

24 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

SRI DEEPU G vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM

The authority's refusal to provide power supply after sanctioning it is unjustified and quashed by the court.

23 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

SMT SUSHEELAMMA vs SMT LEELAMBIKA

The court allows withdrawal of the appeal based on the parties' settlement agreement.

23 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

MANOJKUMAR vs PARVEEN BEGUM AND ANR

The court ruled that the initial compensation for severe injuries was grossly inadequate and enhanced it significantly to address the claimant's needs.

23 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

SMT PADMAVATHI W/O LATE G RAGHAVENDRA vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

The court allows withdrawal of a petition when parties indicate settlement out of court.

23 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

SRI. MAHADEVAIAH vs SMT. SHIVAMMA

Failure to prosecute an appeal results in dismissal due to lack of representation and interest.

23 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

NARAYAN S/O ANAND KULKARNI vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

A petition may be dismissed if the petitioner withdraws it as per procedural norms.

23 Jun 25

India - Karnataka

NAGARAJU vs PUTTARAJU @ THIMMAPPA

Failure to diligently pursue an appeal and significant delay can lead to dismissal.

23 Jun 25

India - Kerala

ABDUL GAFOOR vs STATE OF KERALA

The court ruled that the continued detention of the accused was unnecessary given the circumstances of the case and prior bail granted to co-accused.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

BINCY P. KOSHY vs STATE OF KERALA

A bail application can be withdrawn with liberty to file a proper application based on the crime alleged.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

SHIBU vs STATE OF KERALA

The court can grant bail in serious offences by balancing the nature of allegations against the period of detention and available evidence.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

HAREKRUSHNA NAIK vs STATE OF KERALA

The court determined that the non-commercial quantity of contraband does not invoke Section 37 of the NDPS Act, allowing bail under specified conditions.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

ASHOK KUMAR B vs SUDEEP M.S

The court may grant an opportunity to prosecute a complaint where the appellant shows valid reasons for previous non-prosecution, subject to conditions.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

SUBASH KUMAR vs STATE OF KERALA

The court balanced the seriousness of allegations against the duration of pre-trial detention, allowing bail with specific conditions.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

VIDHYADHARAN vs STATE OF KERALA

Change of counsel does not justify recalling witnesses unless essential for justice; dissatisfaction with prior cross-examination is insufficient.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

GOGAN UDAAN SINGH vs STATE OF KERALA

Bail granted based on detention period and contraband quantity, exempting Section 37 rigour.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

SRI. SIMON OUSEPH THADATHIL vs THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE

The court ruled that late fees imposed beyond Rs.10,000 were invalid, and acknowledged the petitioner's input tax credit as undisputed.

26 Jun 25

India - Kerala

NITTA GELATIN INDIA LTD. vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Mis-declaration of goods does not invalidate imports under the advance authorization scheme if conditions are met, and penalties for past transactions are not warranted.

26 Jun 25

India - Rajasthan

State of Rajasthan vs Jadawali wife of Shri Budh Ram

The prosecution must establish a proximate link between dowry-related harassment and death to convict under Section 304B IPC.

16 Jun 25

India - Rajasthan

ARPIT NARANIWAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Consent obtained under false promises of marriage is invalid under Section 90 IPC, warranting further investigation into allegations of sexual offences.

03 Jun 25

India - Rajasthan

KAILASH NATH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Imposing a deposit condition on an indigent accused violates principles of justice and equity, leading to discriminatory outcomes.

30 May 25

India - Rajasthan

MANDEEP KOUR Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Individuals not joining after a promotion may opt to forego it, ensuring consistency in judicial treatment.

30 May 25

India - Rajasthan

MOHAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Suspension of sentence granted due to possession of contraband below commercial quantity and the applicant's prior bail status, emphasizing the need for fair appeal proceedings.

30 May 25

India - Rajasthan

DHANESH Vs. STATE

The court affirmed the conviction for rash driving but modified the sentence to the time already served, emphasizing the interests of justice.

30 May 25

India - Rajasthan

BABU LAL JANWA Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

The retrospective application of qualification criteria in recruitment processes must not adversely affect candidates' eligibility and merit.

30 May 25

India - Rajasthan

SMT. URMILA KEER Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

The court held that elections for a vacant Sarpanch position are valid if the vacancy does not arise within six months of the term's end, as per the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

30 May 25

India - Rajasthan

M/S. PRAVEEN HANDICRAFT Vs. SMT. REKHA SHARMA WIFE OF SHRI JAI PRAKASH SHARMA

The right to cross-examine is a statutory right essential for a fair hearing, but repeated delays can lead to imposed costs and conditions.

30 May 25

India - Rajasthan

STATE Vs. TEJ KARAN AND ORS

The court upheld the conviction under Section 498-A IPC for cruelty due to dowry demands, while acquitting the accused of murder charges under Sections 302 and 304-B IPC due to insufficient evidence.

30 May 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

SUNIL KUMAR Vs HANUMAN SINGH AND ORS

Compensation for injuries must be just and adequate, reflecting the true impact on the claimant's life and future earning capacity.

09 Apr 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

MAYA RAM Vs STATE OF HARYANA

Anticipatory bail granted as no cognizable offence was established against the petitioner, who was merely an attesting witness and willing to cooperate with the investigation.

09 Apr 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

NAZAR SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA

A conviction for murder cannot be sustained solely on expert testimony without corroborative evidence, especially when eyewitnesses contradict the prosecution's case.

09 Apr 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

PREM BAJAJ Vs STATE OF HARYANA

The court emphasized that anticipatory bail is warranted when no criminal liability is established, focusing on contractual obligations instead.

09 Apr 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

SHELZA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

The court mandates a fresh evaluation of the petitioner's claim for regularization, emphasizing fairness and adherence to prior judgments.

09 Apr 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

State of Punjab vs Karamjeet Kaur

The court ruled that qualifications obtained through distance education prior to specified cut-off dates are valid, emphasizing the right to education and rejecting arbitrary restrictions on territor....

09 Apr 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

KULDEEP Vs STATE OF HARYANA

The court granted bail due to insufficient evidence linking the petitioner to the murder, emphasizing the importance of direct evidence over hearsay.

02 Apr 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

Balwinder Singh vs Balwinder Kaur (since deceased) through her LRs

The High Court's power under Article 227 is to be exercised with restraint, ensuring compliance with prior orders and maintaining judicial discipline.

28 Mar 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

State of Punjab Vs Gurdit Singh @ Vishal & another

The prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and the absence of key witness testimony undermines the credibility of the prosecution's narrative.

28 Mar 25

India - Punjab and Haryana

PRINCE Vs STATE OF PUNJAB

The court ruled that pre-trial incarceration should not equate to punishment, allowing bail with stringent conditions to protect the victim and ensure compliance.

28 Mar 25

India - Delhi

BARUN BHANOT vs ANNIE IMPEXPO

The presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act is rebuttable, and the burden shifts to the complainant once the accused raises a probable defense.

09 Jun 25

India - Delhi

Vineet Gupta vs Union of India

The right to travel is a fundamental right under Article 21, and restrictions must be justified with substantial evidence.

06 Jun 25

India - Delhi

Sanoj Kumar Mishr vs State of NCT of Delhi

The court emphasized the need for stern action against false complaints of sexual offences to protect the integrity of genuine victims and societal trust.

30 May 25

India - Delhi

MINOR S (THR. MOTHER M) vs STATE & ANR.

The court emphasized that procedural requirements should not delay medical care for sexual assault victims, particularly minors, and established guidelines for immediate medical responses.

29 May 25

India - Delhi

XXX vs State NCT of Delhi

In a marital relationship, consent is implied, and Section 377 IPC does not apply to consensual sexual acts between spouses.

13 May 25

India - Delhi

GURMEET SINGH SACHDEVA vs SKYWAYS AIR SERVICES PVT. LTD

The court emphasized that a plaint must be assessed with accompanying documents to determine if it discloses a valid cause of action, cautioning against premature dismissals.

08 May 25

India - Delhi

Surpal Cycles Pvt. Ltd. vs State of NCT of Delhi

The court upheld the requirement for stringent conditions, including an FDR and surety bond, for granting permission to travel abroad, while questioning the trial Court's authority to suspend LOC.

06 May 25

India - Delhi

Dilshad Hussain vs Pushpa Devi

Interlocutory orders do not determine rights or liabilities and are not revisable under Section 397(2) CrPC, emphasizing the distinction between interlocutory and intermediate orders.

05 May 25

India - Delhi

J.G S DEPARTMENTAL STORE Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 60(1) & ORS.

The court held that an order under Section 148A(d) cannot exceed the scope of the notice under Section 148A(b), ensuring the Assessee's right to respond to allegations.

15 Apr 25

India - Delhi

BABY ADIRA JATIA & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

The court emphasized that municipal authorities must act systematically and transparently, especially in cases involving unauthorized construction, and cannot favor one party in private disputes.

15 Apr 25

India - Allahabad

Shahid vs State Of UP

The court emphasized that in capital punishment cases, all evidence must be properly examined and the accused must be afforded a fair opportunity to defend, failing which the trial is rendered unjust....

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Shiv Narayan Gupta vs Garib Chandra

The court held that an amendment to a preliminary decree is permissible when new evidence emerges, emphasizing the importance of justice in partition suits.

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Sarvanarain Tewari vs State of U.P.

The court affirmed that in cases of murder, a complete chain of evidence must be established to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with the burden of proof shifting to the accused when the crime oc....

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Rohit Rajput vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

The court affirmed that a Magistrate can order further investigation post-charge-sheet to ensure justice, overruling previous judgments that restricted such authority.

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Sitam @ Prince Minor Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others vs State Of U.P.

Cognizance under POCSO Act requires a valid police report or complaint; reliance solely on victim's statement is insufficient if the applicant is not named in the charge sheet.

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Savita Devi @ Pinki Gautam @ Shivangi Shishodiya vs Jitendra Gautam

Maintenance pendente lite is a right for a spouse lacking sufficient income, independent of allegations regarding previous marriages.

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Saumya Sajiv Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P.

Welfare of the child is paramount in custody disputes, particularly for minor girls entering puberty, necessitating a nurturing maternal presence.

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Mohd. Mustkeem vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Food U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt.

The court affirmed that a licensee does not possess a fundamental right to operate a fair price shop and that the inquiry process regarding license cancellation is summary in nature, aligning with pr....

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Amod Kumar Sachan Presently Professor Head of Deptt. Deptt. of Pharmacology Kgmu Lko. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy.

The denial of legal assistance and access to documents in disciplinary proceedings violates natural justice, especially when the accused faces a legally trained opponent.

30 May 25

India - Allahabad

Naushad vs State of U.P.

Circumstantial evidence must be conclusive and all links in the chain must be established beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants acquittal.

30 May 25

India - Patna

Om Logistics Limited vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

The court upheld the validity of a notification declaring Codeine-containing medicines as intoxicants, affirming the State's legislative competence to regulate substances for public health.

16 May 25

India - Patna

Angad Kumar Arzoo vs The State of Bihar

Merit must prevail in public service appointments, and procedural lapses in notifications can lead to reinstatement of more qualified candidates.

07 May 25

India - Patna

Medicare Environmental Management Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Bihar (deleted vide order dated 28.07.2023)

Public authorities must act fairly and transparently in tender processes, and cancellation of tenders must not be arbitrary, especially when errors affect the entire bidding process.

07 May 25

India - Patna

Janvani Prakashan Pvt Ltd. vs The State of Bihar

Eligibility criteria in government tenders are within the executive's purview and not subject to judicial review unless proven arbitrary or unreasonable.

05 May 25

India - Patna

Rejesh Kumar Chandra vs The State of Bihar

The court mandated that the petitioners' claims for absorption must be evaluated under Rule 1235 of the Bihar Police Manual, emphasizing adherence to established recruitment procedures.

05 May 25

India - Patna

Pankaj Rai vs The Union of India

The court held that a service tax demand order issued after the statutory time limit is invalid, emphasizing the necessity for timely adjudication in tax matters.

05 May 25

India - Patna

Kaushlendra Kumar vs The State of Bihar

The recovery of tax was deemed illegal as it violated statutory provisions requiring a three-month waiting period before initiating recovery proceedings.

01 May 25

India - Patna

Dashrath Prasad Singh vs The State of Bihar

The court affirmed that similarly situated individuals must receive equal treatment under the law, emphasizing the arbitrary nature of the authorities' actions in denying ACP benefits.

27 Mar 25

India - Patna

Sachidanand Singh VS State of Bihar

25 Mar 25

India - Patna

B. K. Warehousing LLP. VS State of Bihar

21 Mar 25

India - Bombay

M/s. Carona Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Special range, 29, Mumbai

A plausible claim for deduction, even if disallowed, does not constitute concealment or inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.

20 Jun 25

India - Bombay

SUJAL MANGALA BIRWADKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY SOCIAL JUSTICE AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE DEPT. AND ANR

For a child of mixed caste to claim Scheduled Caste status, evidence of actual discrimination or disadvantage must be demonstrated.

20 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Sundyne Pumps and Compressors India Pvt Ltd vs The Union of India

The Petitioner is considered an independent contractor not an agent, hence eligible for ITC refunds under GST provisions relating to zero-rated supplies.

16 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Jyoti C. Raheja and others vs Aasia Properties Development Ltd. and others

The court ruled that both oppression and just and equitable grounds must be established for the CLB to exercise jurisdiction under the Companies Act, emphasizing strict interpretation of Articles of ....

16 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Vishwas Haridas Jadhavar vs The Union of India

The court held that legislative changes do not retroactively affect concluded selection processes without reservation for mental disabilities.

16 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Kothari Metals Ltd vs Union of India

International treaty provisions must be incorporated into domestic law to be enforceable; Customs Authorities retain jurisdiction under the Customs Act to issue show cause notices.

13 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha vs The Registrar of Trade Marks

The Registrar must provide a reasoned order when refusing trade mark registration, considering substantial evidence of prior use and international reputation.

13 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Vitthalrao Shinde Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra

The court ruled that the issue of EMI deduction for RSP calculation must be reconsidered by the Board, emphasizing fair play and stakeholder involvement in administrative decisions.

13 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs Union of India through the Under Secretary Government of India, Ministry of Commerce

The court established that changes in testing methods do not alter the classification of goods, affirming entitlement to benefits under the Cash Compensatory Support Scheme for exports made prior to ....

12 Jun 25

India - Bombay

Krantijyoti Savitribai Phule Nidhi Limited. vs The Union of India

The court emphasized the necessity of providing a specific notice to a Nidhi Company before rejecting its NDH-4 Form, highlighting procedural fairness and proper adherence to statutory requirements.

11 Jun 25

India - Gauhati

Thomas Lamnio Son of Shri Dapung Lamnio vs State of AP

The court upheld the conviction under the POCSO Act, affirming that consent is irrelevant when the victim is a minor, and established the victim's age as 16 years through credible evidence.

20 May 25

India - Gauhati

PAKU KARMAKAR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM

The testimony of injured witnesses holds significant evidentiary value, and their accounts should not be dismissed without compelling reasons, especially when corroborated by medical evidence.

16 May 25

India - Gauhati

Jacob Lalramtiama vs The State of Mizoram

The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with evidentiary standards for electronic records and the importance of witness credibility in criminal cases.

16 May 25

India - Gauhati

DR. BISWAJIT SARMA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM

A government servant cannot hold two liens simultaneously; termination of a lien on a permanent post requires acquisition of a lien on another permanent post outside the original cadre.

16 May 25

India - Gauhati

Goljar Uddin Ahmed @ Raju vs The State of Assam

The prosecution's failure to produce seized contraband and corroborate police testimony undermines the case, leading to acquittal on benefit of doubt.

15 May 25

India - Gauhati

MD. SAMSUDDIN SARKAR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM

Procedural timelines in administrative law are essential to ensure fairness and timely resolution of disputes, allowing petitioners to seek redress effectively.

14 May 25

India - Gauhati

Janashimalu High School, Rep. By Its Head Master Cum Secretary, Sri Kanak Kalita vs State Of Assam, Rep. By The Comm. and Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam, Education Secondary Deptt.

The court affirmed the entitlement of petitioners to financial assistance for educational institutions, emphasizing compliance with prior court orders.

06 May 25

India - Gauhati

National Insurance Company Limited vs Prantik Gautam, S/o. Late Anil Sarmah

The court upheld the necessity for accurate compensation calculations in motor vehicle accident claims, emphasizing deductions for expenses and appropriate interest rates.

06 May 25

India - Gauhati

Principal Secretary To The Government Of Assam, Urban Development Department vs Pradyut Baruah, S/o. Shri Deben Baruah

Pay protection under FR 22 applies only to government servants; non-government employees transitioning to government roles are not entitled to such protection.

06 May 25

India - Gauhati

Babul Ali @ Babu Barpeta, Assam vs State Of Assam Rep. By PP, Assam

The court affirmed that eyewitness testimony, when consistent and corroborated, can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, even in the absence of forensic evidence.

06 May 25

India - Orissa

State of Orissa vs Maheswar Barik

The prosecution failed to establish charges of dowry death and cruelty beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the upholding of the acquittal.

16 May 25

India - Orissa

M/s. Viraj Steel & Energy Private Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner of State Tax

The authority's power to impose penalties under the GST Act is valid even when goods are not physically available for confiscation, provided the statutory provisions are followed.

15 May 25

India - Orissa

Indrajit De vs Republic of India (CBI)

The court affirmed that bail conditions, including passport surrender, are valid but can be modified based on individual circumstances, emphasizing the need for compliance and the absence of flight r....

15 May 25

India - Orissa

SHRUTISUDHA NAYAK vs ABHIJIT NAYAK

Non-compliance with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights does not automatically disentitle a wife from maintenance; sufficient cause must be established.

07 May 25

India - Orissa

BALDEV RATH vs STATE OF ODISHA

Sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory for prosecuting public servants when the alleged acts are connected to their official duties.

05 May 25

India - Orissa

PRASANNA KUMAR MOHAPATRA vs STATE OF ODISHA

The court affirmed that a vehicle seized under the Forest Act must be released in accordance with a Sessions Judge's order, even during ongoing confiscation proceedings.

05 May 25

India - Orissa

ASHOK KUMAR DAS vs STATE OF ODISHA(VIG.)

The absence of prior sanction for prosecution and inordinate delay in proceedings violate the right to a speedy trial, rendering the case against the petitioner unsustainable.

05 May 25

India - Orissa

KARUNAKAR MISHRA vs STATE OF ODISHA

The court quashed the charge sheet as the allegations of sexual harassment were found to be vague and lacking corroborative evidence, indicating a misuse of the criminal process.

05 May 25

India - Orissa

M/S SHREE MONOLITHICS PVT LTD vs DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT

The Enforcement Directorate's seizure of property under the PMLA must be supported by a clear nexus to criminal activity and adherence to due process.

05 May 25

India - Orissa

MADHUSMITA SAMANTA vs RAJESH SINGH

The court established that a pattern of behavior constituting mental cruelty, including harassment and intimidation, justifies the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marria....

19 Mar 25

India - Telangana

Guruvani Srikanth vs The State of Telangana

Court emphasized the procedural adherence and fair application of laws regarding utility services, mandating reconsideration of the rejected application.

17 Jun 25

India - Telangana

M/s. Sri Vishnu Scientifics and Chemicals vs The Assistant Commissioner

The court ruled on tax liability procedures and the conditions for interim protection pending Tribunal's decision.

17 Jun 25

India - Telangana

Smt M.Rajarani Bai vs The State of Telangana

The court reaffirmed the necessity of using statutory remedies provided for grievances before considering direct interference.

17 Jun 25

India - Telangana

Sri Venkatram Reddy Mantur vs Sri Swaroop Oorilla

Unsigned administrative notices require proper issuance to ensure due legal process.

17 Jun 25

India - Telangana

Jitender Babu Ravula vs Government of India

The court emphasizes that applicants must disclose pending criminal cases when applying for passport renewal under the Passport Act, 1967.

17 Jun 25

India - Telangana

MD. Shabaz vs CBIC

The court grants permission to withdraw a writ petition resulting in dismissal without costs.

13 Jun 25

India - Telangana

Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 vs State

The court emphasized the necessity for cooperation with the investigation while granting anticipatory bail under specific statutory provisions.

13 Jun 25

India - Telangana

Sri. Karthiekyan Sridharan vs State of Telangana

The court ruled that a sale deed must be registered if the government's claim of ownership is rejected and not suspended, emphasizing compliance with registration laws.

13 Jun 25

India - Telangana

Sri S. Sai Kiran vs Government Pleader for Services-I

Court orders timely consideration of spouse ground representation without delving into case merits.

13 Jun 25

India - Telangana

Sri N. Gangadhar vs Sri Bhukya Mangilal Naik

The existence of an alternative statutory remedy precludes interference in appeals unless the lower court's decision is unjustified.

13 Jun 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

Darana Harry Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

The court affirmed the petitioner's entitlement to death benefits as the legal heir, directing authorities to reconstruct the service register and pay the amounts due, while denying the family pensio....

09 May 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

ABDUL SHUKUR vs SYED NIZAMUDDIN

In a suit for permanent injunction, the plaintiff must prove lawful possession of the property on the date of the suit, and the burden of proof shifts based on the evidence presented.

08 May 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

Akkala Rami Reddy S/o. Venkata Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Public Prosecutor

A converted Christian cannot invoke the SC ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act as they cease to be a member of the Scheduled Caste community upon conversion.

30 Apr 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

GADDE SANDHYA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Registration authorities must assess stamp duty based on auction prices, not market values, as established by legal precedents.

30 Apr 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

Vidadala Rajani vs State Of Andhra Pradesh

Anticipatory bail can be granted if no prima facie case exists, especially when allegations are politically motivated or lack corroboration.

25 Apr 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

Sita Mahalakshmi Rice Traders vs Canara Bank

Invocation of expired bank guarantees is valid if no restraint orders exist, and availability of alternative statutory remedies under SARFAESI Act precludes writ jurisdiction.

25 Apr 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

SRC Aviations Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Andhra Pradesh

The absence of cogent evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged offenses under IPC sections 120B, 409, 420, 468, 471, and 477A necessitated the quashing of criminal proceedings.

24 Apr 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

BASURU MANI BHUSHANA RAO vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Vague allegations without specific details do not justify legal proceedings under Section 498A IPC or the Dowry Prohibition Act.

24 Apr 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

Banjaru Vamshi Krishna @ Mangali Vamsi, Kurool Dt. vs State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep Pp

The court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible dying declarations, emphasizing that minor inconsistencies do not undermine their reliability.

24 Apr 25

India - Andhra Pradesh

State of a.P. vs M. lalithamma @ Lolamma

Escheat proceedings initiated without following proper procedures are invalid, and Class-II heirs are entitled to claim the properties of a deceased without Class-I heirs.

24 Apr 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Ghasiram Raikwar vs Pirwa @ Pyarelal(Died) Through Lrs A Smt. Ashabai

The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code limits interference with factual findings unless proven perverse.

09 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Rakesh Kumar vs Ashok Kumar

Findings of fact in a second appeal cannot be interfered with unless proven perverse; the burden of proof regarding property ownership lies with the party claiming self-acquisition.

09 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Prosecutrix X vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

The court affirmed the right to reproductive autonomy under Article 21, allowing a minor victim of rape to terminate her pregnancy, emphasizing the importance of her consent and well-being.

09 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Parasnath Vishwakarma vs Shyam Kartik @Ganga Vishwakarma

Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts cannot be interfered with unless perverse; established possession does not equate to title without sufficient evidence.

09 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Jayram Pandey vs Snatosh Kumar Mishra

The appellate court's jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is limited to cases of perverse findings or lack of evidence, affirming the trial court's decree on possession and ....

09 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Mubarik Mohammed S/O Shri Vali Mohammed Thruogh His Wife And Representative Smt. Mumtaz Bee vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Demolition of unauthorized structures must adhere to due process, including notice and opportunity for hearing, as mandated by the Supreme Court.

02 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Anil Kushwah vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Anticipatory bail can be granted under the NDPS Act when the applicant shows willingness to cooperate with the investigation and complies with specified conditions.

02 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Hifazat Himayu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions to ensure cooperation in investigation and prevent interference with witnesses.

02 Jun 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Reshambai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Mere non-performance of a contract does not constitute cheating unless there is evidence of dishonest intention from the inception of the transaction.

29 May 25

India - Madhya Pradesh

Akshya Kumar Goyal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

The court emphasized that vague allegations in matrimonial disputes can lead to misuse of legal provisions, necessitating specific claims to avoid abuse of process.

29 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Amit Kumar vs State of Himachal Pradesh

The right to a speedy trial is fundamental under Article 21, and undue delay in trial can justify bail, emphasizing the presumption of innocence.

23 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Madan Gopal vs Krishan Gopal(deceased) through his LRs Savitri Devi

The court upheld the validity of the Will executed by the deceased, emphasizing the necessity of specific pleading for undue influence and confirming the suit was barred by limitation.

22 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Keshav Ram vs State of H.P

The Notification restricting the multiplier factor for land compensation to one in rural areas is ultra vires the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, mandating a mini....

22 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Ganesh Kumar (Govt. Contractor) vs State of Himachal Pradesh

The court upheld the necessity of transparency and fairness in public procurement processes, affirming that deviations from established guidelines justify the cancellation of tenders.

22 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Rishabh Negi vs State of Himachal Pradesh

The court emphasized that bail is a means to secure attendance at trial, and personal liberty should only be curtailed when necessary, reflecting the presumption of innocence.

22 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Krishan vs State of Himachal Pradesh

The presumption of innocence applies in bail applications, and previous unconvicted offenses do not automatically justify denial of bail.

22 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Jaypee University of Information Technology vs State of H. P.

The court held that a university's ancillary activities, such as providing food to students, do not constitute business for tax purposes, emphasizing the need for proof of intent to conduct business.

22 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Subhkaran vs State of Himachal Pradesh

The court emphasized the presumption of innocence and the necessity of judicial discretion in granting bail, particularly in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband.

21 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Rubby Devi vs Bala Devi

Amendments to pleadings after trial commencement require due diligence and are not a matter of right; the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction is limited to correcting grave errors.

21 May 25

India - Himachal Pradesh

Sunita Devi vs State of H.P.

Residency in the same ward is a critical factor in selection criteria for Part-Time Multi Task Workers, as confirmed by the Block Development Officer's report.

21 May 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Sadhu Ram vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Petitioner must exhaust statutory remedies for gratuity and provident fund claims before approaching the court.

20 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Kamta Ram Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh

The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt for a conviction under Section 306 IPC; failure leads to acquittal.

20 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Amol Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh

The prosecution must prove the victim's age beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so results in acquittal.

20 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Tuleshwawr Dhruw vs State Of Chhattisgarh

The court emphasized the importance of witness examination and the seriousness of charges under POCSO Act in denying bail.

20 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Shri Ganesh Tractors Through The Proprietor Niranjan Kumar Rathor vs Mahesh Ram Kumbhkar

The victim has the right to appeal against an acquittal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.

20 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Ratan Kushwaha vs State Of Chhattisgarh

The existence of an alternative remedy under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code precludes judicial review of administrative actions.

17 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Angelique International Limited vs Union of India Ministry of Railways (Railway Board)

The court ruled that a petitioner must exhaust all available remedies before seeking intervention through writ jurisdiction, emphasizing the importance of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

17 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Varun Singh vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vague and general allegations in matrimonial disputes do not constitute a prima facie case for prosecution; specific allegations are necessary to avoid misuse of legal provisions.

17 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Kumar Chandra vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vague and general allegations in dowry cases cannot sustain criminal prosecution; specific evidence is required to prevent misuse of legal provisions.

17 Jun 25

India - Chhattisgarh

Shiv Prasad Kushwaha vs State Of Chhattisgarh

The court ruled that pending appeals regarding land records must be resolved before entertaining claims of ownership, emphasizing the importance of established legal processes.

17 Jun 25

India - Calcutta

Sudhar Mangar vs The State of West Bengal

The failure to inform an arrested person of the grounds for arrest constitutes a violation of fundamental rights, rendering the arrest illegal and necessitating bail.

11 Jun 25

India - Calcutta

Kamal Singh Jain & Anr. vs Anil Kumar Poddar

Fair rent must be determined reasonably, considering locality, condition, and amenities, and cannot be solely based on outdated agreements.

15 May 25

India - Calcutta

Srijan Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs John Augustine

A suit for land must be filed in the jurisdiction where the property is located, and undue delay in seeking injunction undermines the claim for equitable relief.

14 May 25

India - Calcutta

JITEN CHOWBEY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL

The High Court can quash convictions for non-heinous offences based on voluntary compromises between the parties, emphasizing the personal nature of the dispute and the ends of justice.

07 May 25

India - Calcutta

SANU KHAN vs THE STATE

The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the conduct of the accused can lead to adverse inferences regarding their guilt.

07 May 25

India - Calcutta

SAYADA BIBI & ORS. vs SAKINA BEGUM

The court affirmed that thika tenancy rights persist despite claims of ownership, emphasizing the need for proper legal transfer to extinguish such rights.

07 May 25

India - Calcutta

ANTARA MONDAL vs INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AND ORS

The selection process for LPG distributorship must adhere strictly to the established guidelines, and any deviation or arbitrary decision-making undermines the integrity of the process.

07 May 25

India - Calcutta

SAMBRITA GANGULY vs KOLKATA MUNICIPAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

Compassionate appointment is a discretionary benefit requiring proof of financial hardship, not a vested right, and must adhere to specific eligibility criteria.

06 May 25

India - Calcutta

PRINCIPAL COMMIDDIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 KOLKATA vs WISE INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMNITED

The court affirmed that the burden of proof lies with the revenue to establish non-genuineness of transactions under Section 68, which was not met in this case.

06 May 25

India - Calcutta

GOBINDAPUR SEPHALI SAMAJ SEBA SAMITYREPD BY SUKUMAR RANA AND ORS vs GOBINDAPUR SEPHALI SAMAJ SEBA SAMITY REPD BY SUBHAS GHOSH AND ORS

The court emphasized that ex parte injunctions require a higher standard of justification, which was not met, leading to the setting aside of the injunction order.

05 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Arun Kumar, S/o. Late Narain Pandit vs Union of India

Public interest litigations must demonstrate genuine public interest and timely action, with courts verifying the petitioner's credentials and the validity of claims before proceeding.

05 Jun 25

India - Jharkhand

State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary vs Meera Jha, W/o. Late Udyanand Jha

Government entities must demonstrate diligence in filing appeals; bureaucratic delays do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.

05 Jun 25

India - Jharkhand

Mithlesh Singh vs State of Jharkhand

Legal representatives of a deceased informant can be substituted in ongoing criminal proceedings to ensure case continuity.

09 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Sri Ram Stone Works, (A Proprietorship concern), through its Authorized Signatory, namely, Bajrangi Bhagat, son of Rajendra Bhagat vs State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of State Tax

Notices issued under Section 61 of the JGST Act based solely on market price comparisons are beyond jurisdiction and must relate to discrepancies in filed returns.

09 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Kumardhubi Metal Casting & Engineering Ltd. (KMCEL) vs Kumardhubi Karamachari Congress

The court emphasized procedural compliance in notifying workmen and ensuring proper disbursement of funds by the Official Liquidator.

09 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Janardhan Narayan Deo, son of Late Sarju Narayan Deo vs Sahdeo Modi, son of Late Nathu Modi

The court held that a satisfactory explanation for delay is essential for condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and failure to provide such explanation results in dismissal.

09 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Vikash Kumar vs State of Jharkhand

The court ruled that the victim's age and lack of resistance were pivotal in suspending the sentence and granting bail, questioning the conviction under Section 366-A.

09 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh K. Kusuwaha, son of Sri Sahdeo Prasad @ Sahdeo Mahto vs State of Jharkhand

Anticipatory bail is denied when cognizance has been taken under serious charges, emphasizing the gravity of the allegations.

09 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Suryavanshi Self Help Group, represented by its secretary, Prabhakar Narayan vs State of Jharkhand, represented by its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand

The court emphasized that administrative actions must adhere to principles of natural justice, and arbitrary withholding of payments violates constitutional rights.

09 May 25

India - Jharkhand

Amit Kumar vs State of Jharkhand

Banks lack authority to freeze accounts related to internal union disputes without legal justification.

09 May 25

India - Gujarat

DIPAK GAJENDRASINH JAT vs STATE OF GUJARAT

The court emphasized that suspension of sentence should be considered liberally unless exceptional circumstances exist, particularly when the appeal is pending and the sentence is of limited duration....

17 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

Mukesh Bhanwarlal Bhandari & Ors. vs State of Gujarat & Ors.

Operating premises as a Paying Guest Hostel without registration violates local regulations and is deemed illegal.

17 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

VIRAL BIPINBHAI KAPADIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

The court emphasizes quashing of FIRs under Section 482 to prevent abuse of legal processes when disputes are amicably settled.

16 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

SATYANARAYAN SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA

The court affirmed that provocation must be both grave and sudden to qualify for the IPC exceptions, which was not met in this case.

16 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

BHARATBHAI S/O GOBARBHAI BHEDA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Preventive detention requires clear evidence that an individual's activities adversely affect public order, which was found lacking in this case.

16 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

MADHUBHAI S/O KANUBHAI BHUVA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Preventive detention requires substantial evidence reflecting a threat to public order rather than isolated law and order issues.

16 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

JAKIRHUSSAIN BHURIYO VAJIRMOHAMMED BIN AHMADMIYA MALEK vs STATE OF GUJARAT

The court grants suspension of sentence based on lengthy incarceration and parity with co-accused.

16 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

SANJAYBHAI ISHWARBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

The court found merit in the applicant's appeal against the acquittal based on improper appreciation of evidence regarding the notice served.

16 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

HUSSAIN ISHAQ MASALAWALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

The conviction must be upheld if evidence proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt, despite minor inconsistencies in witness testimonies.

16 Jun 25

India - Gujarat

SATYANARAYAN SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA

The absence of eyewitnesses does not negate a murder conviction when corroborated by circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession, emphasizing the burden of proof for exceptions lies with th....

16 Jun 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

SARFARAZ AHMED TH MOHD MUSHTAQ vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS

The failure to timely communicate the rejection of a detenu's representation violates constitutional rights, rendering the detention order illegal.

05 May 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

ROUF AHMAD SHEIKH vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)

Preventive detention orders must be based on fresh evidence; reliance on stale material from previous detentions invalidates current orders.

05 May 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

SANJEEV GUPTA vs CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF JAMMU TH ITS REGISTRAR RAYHA SUCHANI SAMBA

The court established that candidates do not have vested rights to promotion if the process is unfinalized, allowing the employer to amend promotion criteria.

05 May 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

INDU BHUSHAN BALI vs DIRECTOR GENERAL SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL SSB R K PURAM NEW DELHI.

Review proceedings under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure are limited to errors apparent on the record and cannot be used to reargue previously decided matters.

05 May 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

AJAZ AHMED TH NUSRAT JAAN vs COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT

Preventive detention under the NDPS Act is justified when there is sufficient material indicating repeated offenses, and the delay in issuing the order does not sever the link to the detenu's activit....

05 May 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

SHER MOHD TH FAMIDA BEGUM vs UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS

The court upheld the detention under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, affirming that sufficient material justified the detaining authority's decision and that the petitioner was adequately in....

05 May 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

Rajinder Kumar vs State of J&K

A consensual relationship cannot be construed as rape based solely on a subsequent refusal to marry; no offence established under sections 376 and 506 RPC.

02 May 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

MAJID ASHRAF WANI vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (HOME)

Preventive detention requires the detaining authority to provide all material relied upon and consider relevant factors such as bail granted in related criminal cases.

11 Apr 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

KARAM CHAND AND OTHERS vs U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS

The court emphasized that appeals filed after significant delays must be justified with adequate reasons, and parties must be given a fair opportunity to be heard.

11 Apr 25

India - Jammu and Kashmir

TAJINDER SINGH ALIAS HAPPY vs UT OF J AND K THROUGH KASHMIR THROUGH COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY TO THE GOVT AND OTHERS

Preventive detention under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act is lawful when based on reasonable suspicion of future prejudicial acts, distinct from punitive measures.

08 Apr 25

India - Uttarakhand

SURESH KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions emphasizing cooperation with the investigation and attendance at trial, reflecting the court's discretion in balancing rights and legal obligations.

07 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

HARPREET SINGH ALIAS HAPPY AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

The court may quash non-compoundable offences if convinced they are personal and do not affect public peace, promoting justice and peace.

07 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Anticipatory bail can be granted when there are no criminal antecedents and the charge-sheet has been filed, emphasizing the protection of personal liberty under Article 21.

05 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

Rajendra Singh AND ANOTHER vs Union Of India AND ANOTHER

The Chief Executive Officer of the Cantonment Board is authorized to issue notices under Section 320 of the Cantonments Act, 2006, and appellants were found to be unauthorized occupants without legal....

02 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

GULSHER ALI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

The High Court can quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences if a compromise serves the ends of justice, considering the facts of each case.

02 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

REKHA DEVI vs SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT

Judicial efficiency requires dismissal of a writ petition when identical issues are under consideration in another case.

02 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

VIRESH KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

The failure to follow proper sampling procedures under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules raises reasonable doubt about the prosecution's case, justifying the grant of bail.

01 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

SHRI TARA CHAND vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

The court affirmed that disputes arising from agreements are civil in nature and cannot be adjudicated under criminal proceedings, emphasizing the limited scope of Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

01 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

AKASH SINGH RANA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

The court upheld the trial court's decision to summon the applicants, finding prima facie evidence of cognizable offences, and emphasized that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exer....

01 May 25

India - Uttarakhand

ADESH KUMAR SHARMA vs VINOD SINGH RAWAT

Mutation entries in revenue records do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved in civil court.

01 May 25

India - Consumer

Suresh Nathan VS State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission

Adjudication of consumer complaint – State Commission is not empowered to dismiss complaint for default or non-prosecution, but is obliged to decide complaint on its merits.

11 Feb 25

India - Consumer

Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation VS L. Sundararajan

Insurance Policy – Deficiency in service – Compensation of Rs.1.50 lacs awarded to complainant.

29 Jan 25

India - Consumer

HDFC Ergo G. I. C. Ltd. VS Namdev Dnyanu Lad (Since Deceased) Through his LRs and Ors.

Revisional Jurisdiction of NC – Concurrent findings given by Forum & State Commission : No illegality or material irregularity: NC has no jurisdiction to interfere with concurrent findings recorded b....

01 Jan 25

India - Consumer

Sudip Das VS DLF Ltd.

24 Dec 24

India - Consumer

Meena Agrawal VS Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited

23 Dec 24

India - Consumer

Care Health Insurance Limited VS Virender Kumar

Medical Practitioner – In the absence of Medico Legal Certificate and Post Mortem Report issued by Medical Practitioner, the certificate issued by the Pradhan, Gram Panchayat, who is admittedly not a....

21 Dec 24

India - Consumer

Balwinder Kaur VS Manohar Infrastructure & Constructions Pvt. Ltd.

20 Dec 24

India - Consumer

Shamim Begum VS B. M. Hyundai, B. M. Auto Sales Pvt. Ltd.

20 Dec 24

India - Consumer

Luminous Power Technologies Pvt. Ltd. VS Jai Krishan Uniyal

20 Dec 24

India - Consumer

Kotak Mahindra Life Insuraance Co. Ltd. VS Anu Lamba

19 Dec 24

India - Crimes

Ajeesh @ Ajeeshkumar VS State of Kerala

In sexual offences against children and women are on increase – Invoking provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 may send wrong message to society at large.

06 Mar 25

India - Crimes

News Tamil 24x7 represented by its Editor : Anand Prabhakar VS Shruthi Thilak

POCSO Cases – There is no bar for Special Judge to forward complaint to Police official to register case and to investigate the matter – Offences under POCSO Act are cognizable offence and police sho....

03 Mar 25

India - Crimes

Tofan Sudarshan Shahu VS State of Gujarat

Bail – Accused can be granted bail in case of prolonged incarceration and blink hope of any speedy trial in the matter.

28 Feb 25

India - Crimes

Rintu @ Thoofan Pradhan VS State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor

(1) Test identification parade conducted during course of investigation cannot be used to corroborate subsequent in-court identification made by witnesses – In-court identification of accused made by....

25 Feb 25

India - Crimes

Priyadarshini Amrita Panda VS Biswajit Pati

Preliminary enquiry – Section 379 of BNSS does not mandate a preliminary enquiry, so also such a course may not be required to be adopted in every cases.

25 Feb 25

India - Crimes

Harjeet Singh VS Union of India

(1) Right to speedy trial is a fundamental right of a person and no person can be deprived of his liberty except in accordance with procedure established by law under Article 21 of Constitution of In....

24 Feb 25

India - Crimes

Prakash Kumar VS State of Himachal Pradesh

Parole – Convicts have right to breathe fresh air for short periods – Any objection raised by local inhabitants/relative cannot be sole determinative basis for refusing parole.

21 Feb 25

India - Crimes

Jillela, Kotha Venkat Reddy VS State of A. P. , Rep. by P. P.

Postmortem report cannot be treated as report of Government Scientific expert as contemplated in Section 293 of Cr.P.C.

19 Feb 25

India - Crimes

Pavankumar VS State of Karnataka Through Adugodi P. S. , Rep. by State Public Prosecutor

Police notice – Service of notice through WhatsApp or other electronic modes cannot be considered or recognised as an alternative or substitute to mode of service recognised and prescribed under Cr.P....

19 Feb 25

India - Crimes

Delwar Sk. @ Delwar Seikh VS State of West Bengal

(1) Statutory bail – Accused under NDPS Act are also entitled to be informed of their such right by Special Judge – If charge-sheet is filed within statutory period of 180 days or within extended per....

18 Feb 25

India - Tripura

Sri Kabir Uddin vs The State of Tripura

Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring fair opportunity for defense; disproportionate punishment undermines justice.

16 May 25

India - Tripura

Sri Biswajit Bhattacharjee vs Smt. Maya Bardhan @ Maya Rani Bardhan (dead)

Civil Courts can examine title disputes even when revenue proceedings are pending, especially when jurisdictional issues arise under specific statutes.

16 May 25

India - Tripura

Chittaranjan Das vs The State of Tripura and 4 others

Recovery of excess payments from retired employees is impermissible without due process, and the principle of natural justice mandates an opportunity to be heard before adverse actions.

27 Mar 25

India - Tripura

SHRI MANGAL SAHA vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA

Strict proof of marriage is required to sustain charges under Section 494 IPC; concealment of prior marriage constitutes cheating under Section 417 IPC.

26 Mar 25

India - Tripura

Sri Uttam Kumar Das vs The State of Tripura and 7 ors

Promotion policies must be applied equitably, and failure to justify the promotion of one candidate over equally qualified individuals constitutes discrimination.

26 Mar 25

India - Tripura

The State of Tripura vs Sri Prasenjit Nath

The appellate court upheld the acquittal of the respondent-accused due to the prosecution's failure to prove charges and denied the request for additional evidence as it aimed to fill gaps in the pro....

26 Mar 25

India - Tripura

Sri Gopal Debnath vs LRs of Lt. Nabdwip Chandra Das and Lt. Nandi Rani Das Sri Babul Das and Ors.

Civil courts can adjudicate on title and possession of land even if revenue proceedings are pending, as established in relevant case law.

25 Mar 25

India - Tripura

Smt. Alpana Bhattacharjee (Choudhury) and Anr. vs Sri Sankar Choudhury and Anr.

The court upheld the validity of the Wills executed by the testatrix, emphasizing the burden of proof lies on the propounder to dispel any suspicious circumstances surrounding their execution.

25 Mar 25

India - Tripura

Sri Dipak Debnath vs The State of Tripura

The conviction for rape was overturned due to insufficient evidence regarding the victim's disability and reliance on uncorroborated testimonies, highlighting the importance of forensic evidence.

21 Mar 25

India - Tripura

Sri Uttam Saha vs The State of Tripura

The court affirmed that conviction under the POCSO Act can rely solely on the victim's testimony, and established the presumption of culpable mental state, placing the burden of proof on the defense.

19 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Chiragbhai Arvindbhai Desai VS Heirs of Pushpaben

(1) Amendment in plaint – Issue of limitation would not be a factor to be considered by Trial Court while adjudicating amendment application.
(2) By way of clever drafting, plaintiff cannot allow ....

07 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Yogendra Singh VS Rajkumar Satnami

Dishonour of cheque – Accused had to prove by cogent evidence that there was no debt or liability.

06 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Mausami Dilipkumar Bhatt VS Maunang Lalitkumar Gor

(1) Custody of minor child – Custody orders are always considered interlocutory orders and by nature of such proceedings, custody orders cannot be made rigid and final and are always capable of being....

06 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Bhuribai VS Bheemsingh

Divorce – Cruelty by husband – Compelling wife to discontinue her studies or creating such an atmosphere that she is put in a position not to continue her studies is equivalent to destroy her dreams ....

06 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

N. T. P. C. Renewable Energy VS Board of Revenue

Revision – Law mandates maintainability of revision petition only in a “decided” case by subordinate revenue court where no appeal lies and secondly, on the ground of jurisdictional error committed b....

05 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Pitta Samadana Swarooparani VS Pitta Kumari

(1) Amendment of plaint – At stage of amendment, merits or correctness of plea sought to be added is not required to be gone into.
(2) Amendment of plaint – Partition suit – Mere delay in filing p....

05 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Velagapudi Kishore Kumar VS Boppana Venkata Naga Krishna

Promissory Note – Mere determination of age of ink/writing by an expert will not clinch the issue as to when exactly maker has written/signed document.

05 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

K. S. Ramesh VS K. S. Rangaswamy

(1) Judgment on admission – For exercise of discretion by Court under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC, admission must be unequivocal – No particular form of admission is necessary – Judgment on admission is ....

03 Mar 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Priyanka Tarapad Bannerji VS State of Maharashtra

Marriage Certificate – Once Marriage Certificate is issued to parties under Special Marriage Act, it is conclusive evidence of legality and solemnity of marriage until it is set aside for any valid r....

28 Feb 25

India - Current Civil Cases

Archana Mukherjee @ Archana Mukherji VS Madhumesh Choudhary

Stay of proceeding in Execution Case – Appeal is considered to be continuation of suit and subject matter of dispute must be kept safe till attaining finality ofissue by way of judgment.

27 Feb 25

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Bank of Baroda through the Chief Manager VS Union of India through Debt Recovery Tribunal

Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002, are independent in oper....

25 Oct 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Shaikh Numan VS Jagdish Dagoria

Dishonour of cheque – Law itself permits accused person to prove that there is no passing of a consideration from complainant to himself and cheque was not issued towards discharge of that considerat....

22 Oct 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Nazim Karim Mumbrawala VS Keshava Prasad H. A.

Dishonour of cheque – Onus lies upon accused to rebut presumption and to establish that cheques in question were not given in respect of any debt or liability, with standard of proof being prepondera....

03 Oct 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

H. P. Singh VS State of Uttarakhand

Inherent power should not be exercised to stifle a legitimate prosecution.

01 Oct 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

P. G. Joshy VS Jose Varghese

(1) Subsequent filling up of an unfilled signed cheque does not amount to alteration of cheque. –
(2) Dishonour of cheque – Court need not insist in every case that accused should disprove non-ex....

19 Sep 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Annappa Maruti Magadum VS Karnataka Multipurpose Souhard Sahakari Ltd.

Dishonour of cheque – Assistance of Handwriting Expert can be taken for just decision of case.

17 Sep 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Rahmatullah VS Authorized Officer-Cum-Chief Manager

Provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be applied to Debts Recovery Tribunal.

26 Aug 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Capital First Limited VS Shree Shyam Pulses Private Limited

A frivolous criminal proceeding cannot be allowed to continue.

22 Aug 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Deepak Kumar VS State of Bihar

If a signed blank cheque is voluntarily presented to a payee, towards some payment, payee may fill up amount and other particulars and this in itself would not invalidate cheque.

20 Aug 19

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

Senthilkumar VS P. Swaminatha Pillai

When a debt has become barred by limitation, a written promise to pay furnishes a fresh cause of action.

08 Aug 19

India - Manipur

Y S Sandhu vs Union Of India And 2 Ors

The court ruled that disciplinary proceedings must continue from the prior stage, allowing the appellant to be granted compulsory retirement due to the excessive delay in proceedings.

07 Apr 25

India - Manipur

STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 OTHERS vs KHUNDRAKPAM SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER

The court held that ad-hoc service cannot be counted as qualifying for pension benefits under the New Pension Scheme, as the initial appointments were not made per the relevant rules.

25 Mar 25

India - Manipur

SUNILKUMAR SINGH SALAM AND 6 ORS vs UNION OF INDIA 2 ORS

The denial of financial benefits from the effective date of promotion constitutes discrimination, violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

21 Mar 25

India - Manipur

Th Subhashini Devi vs Rims

The court ruled that past contractual service of employees can be linked to substantive posts for pension benefits under Rule 17 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, emphasizing fair consideration and r....

21 Mar 25

India - Manipur

A. ATHISA vs L ASHA

The court ruled that the appellant failed to prove her marriage under customary law, while the respondent's marriage was valid, leading to the declaration of the respondent as the legal wife entitled....

21 Mar 25

India - Manipur

Thokchom Manglembi Devi vs Thokchom (N) Phamdom (O) Nungshitonbi Devi and 2 others

Relief not sought in pleadings cannot be granted; the Family Court's dismissal of the suit was excessive and unjustified based on the evidence presented.

21 Mar 25

India - Manipur

Principal Accountant General (A And E) vs K Yangla And 4 Ors

Recovery of excess salary payments from retired employees is restricted by time limits and conditions set by the Supreme Court, emphasizing the need for clarity in undertaking declarations.

19 Mar 25

India - Manipur

THOUDAM RAGHUMANI SINGH vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 ORS

The principle of res-judicata bars re-litigation of issues already decided, affirming the petitioner's entitlement to appointment under the Die-in-Harness Scheme despite previous rejections.

13 Mar 25

India - Manipur

MOIRANGTHEM BIKENJIT SINGH vs MAYENGBAM SANAHAL MEETEI AND 2 OTHERS

The court upheld the writ court's decision to quash a transfer order due to lack of evidence against allegations of political influence and the completion of tenure at the station.

11 Mar 25

India - Manipur

BHABESWAR TONGBRAM vs KHAIDEM JOYCHANDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

A writ of certiorari seeking to quash the appointment of a sitting Vice-Chancellor is not maintainable, necessitating a fresh examination of the legal submissions by the learned Single Judge.

19 Feb 25

India - Nagpur

SHANTA GOVINDRAO APTE, VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

A search conducted by a police officer without a warrant is illegal if the officer does not record the grounds for his belief that an offence has been committed before proceeding to make the search.

30 Jul 56

India - Nagpur

ASARAM GANGARAM VS UNION OF INDIA

The railways are liable for the shortage and damage to the goods as they failed to prove they took proper care of the consignment.

06 Jul 56

India - Nagpur

BULDANA DISTRICT MAIN CLOTH IMPORTERS GROUP VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-CUM-EXCESS PROFITS TAX

An 'Association of Persons' within the meaning of Section 3 of the Income Tax Act, 1922, must be formed by persons who have joined together of their own free volition in some common purpose or action....

13 Apr 56

India - Nagpur

SHAH MULJI DEOJI VS UNION OF INDIA

13 Apr 56

India - Nagpur

TILOKCHAND NATHMAL VS DHUNDIRAJ MADHAVARAO

A person can acquire title by adverse possession to land that is encroached upon, but the right to occupy the space of another owner by means of a projection only extends to the protrusion of the bea....

06 Apr 56

India - Nagpur

SITARAM KUNDANLAL VS PANNALAL KUNDANLAL

In cases of partition between members of a joint Hindu family, where they are in separate possession of property which has not been disputed from a long time, there should be no appointment of a rece....

03 Apr 56

India - Nagpur

SHEOMOHAN PANDE VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

An officiating officer is not entitled to the protection of Article 311(2) of the Constitution if he is reverted to a lesser post due to want of vacancy.

29 Mar 56

India - Nagpur

DWARKANATH JAGANNATH GUPTA VS AMARNATH GOPINATH GUPTA

When the ownership of a property completely vests in another, the landlord's need for the property comes to an end, and the landlord cannot claim to continue proceedings on the basis of his predecess....

23 Mar 56

India - Nagpur

BALKISHAN NATHANI VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

The provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950, do not empower the Nistar Officer to reopen transactions which had taken place prior to the date mentioned in Section 6....

08 Mar 56

India - Nagpur

RAJARAM LAXMANJI JADHAO VS R P SAMARTH

The interpretation of various sections of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948, in relation to the election of Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and Standing Committee members.

29 Feb 56

India - Meghalaya

MEGHALAYA POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED (MePDCL) vs M/S RELIANCE INFRATEL LIMITED AND 3 ORS.

Debts not included in a corporate insolvency resolution plan approved by NCLT are extinguished, allowing the debtor to seek declarations regarding liabilities.

07 May 25

India - Meghalaya

TANDHAN POLYPLAST LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.

Debarment from future tenders requires serious infractions; mere breach of contract without fraud does not justify such action.

05 May 25

India - Meghalaya

SABINA M MARAK vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 OTHERS

The court ruled that the delay in trial does not justify bail when serious allegations of intimidation and ongoing witness examination are present.

05 May 25

India - Meghalaya

DR. AHANTHEM SANTA SINGH vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR.

The FIR lacked necessary allegations to constitute offences under Sections 75 and 76 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, warranting its quashing.

05 May 25

India - Meghalaya

ROHIT KUMAR vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA

A violation of bail conditions does not automatically justify denial of bail if the accused demonstrates no intent to evade trial.

01 May 25

India - Meghalaya

LURSHAI IAWPHNIAW AND 2 ORS. vs THE KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 5 ORS.

An order made by a single Executive Member, contrary to statutory requirements, is invalid and must be remanded for proper consideration.

01 May 25

India - Meghalaya

AJIT PAUL AND 27 ORS. vs THE KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 3 ORS.

The court mandated timely processing of applications for NOC and emphasized adherence to legal procedures by the District Council.

11 Apr 25

India - Meghalaya

DHARAMUKKALA SRINIVASA vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS.

The court ruled that sufficient allegations in the FIR justified the continuation of the investigation, rejecting claims of malice and lack of prima facie case.

11 Apr 25

India - Meghalaya

AMZAD KHAN vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 ORS.

The court ruled that while disciplinary proceedings were fair, the punishment of removal from service was disproportionate and required reassessment.

11 Apr 25

India - Meghalaya

SMTI AISHA KHATOON@ PAHARI vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR

The court upheld the cancellation of bail due to the petitioner's violation of bail conditions, emphasizing the presumption of guilt under the NDPS Act for repeat offenders.

28 Mar 25

India - Sikkim

State Of Sikkim AND ANR. vs Ms Tashi Delek Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

The arbitration clause under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is separable from the underlying contract, allowing it to remain valid even if the contract is quashed.

12 Nov 24

India - Sikkim

Mahesh Chettri VS State of Sikkim

The court established that a victim's credible testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, regardless of delays in reporting, particularly in familial contexts.

03 Jul 24

India - Sikkim

Ganesh Tamang VS State of Sikkim

The court clarified that the status of a perpetrator as a public servant does not require them to act in that capacity during the commission of an aggravated sexual assault.

19 Jun 24

India - Sikkim

Ram Bahadur Subba @ Tawkey VS State of Sikkim

The judgment reinforces that delays in reporting sexual offenses against minors do not invalidate the prosecution's case if corroborated by credible evidence.

12 Jun 24

India - Sikkim

Karan Chettri VS State of Sikkim

The court emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in sexual assault cases and clarified the standards for assessing mental competency in testimony.

12 Jun 24

India - Sikkim

Tshering Dorjee Lepcha VS Chimbu Lepcha

A plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations to claim specific performance under the Specific Relief Act.

30 May 24

India - Sikkim

Union of India, Represented By: Mr. Bikramaditya Chowdhury, Drugs Inspector VS Mukul Enterprises

The court clarified that appeals by the State or Central Government are governed by a 90-day limitation period, and sufficient cause for delay must be demonstrated for condonation.

22 May 24

India - Sikkim

Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited VS Yoel Subba

The court affirmed that a claimant's status as a third party, not a gratuitous passenger, is crucial in determining liability for compensation in motor accident cases.

21 May 24

India - Sikkim

Khem Raj Chettri VS Hem Bahadur Chettri

Contributory negligence in motor vehicle accidents requires a causal connection between the violation of safety laws and the accident's occurrence.

21 May 24

India - Sikkim

State of Sikkim VS Rup Narayan Rai (Chamling)

A pragmatic approach is essential in condoning delays in criminal appeals, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities, especially in cases involving victims.

15 May 24

India - Goa

Premabai VS Rukminibai Jaganath Joshi

The provisions of Section 23(3) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 are not attracted to the facts of a case where the landlord had filed, right from the ....

09 Jun 82

India - Goa

Chowgule and Company, Goa and another VS Union of India

The minimum demand charges under the Electricity Act, 1910, can be levied only when the licensee is ready to supply but the consumer does not consume. When the consumer is ready and willing to consum....

28 May 82

India - Goa

R. X. A. de Monte Furtado VS The Administrator, Goa, Daman and Diu

The cancellation of an ad hoc appointment to a higher post and the reversion of an employee to his substantive post, if done as a punitive measure and without following the procedural safeguards of A....

12 May 82

India - Goa

Shaikh A. Kadar VS Jose Camilo Gomes

The court cannot split the prayer for withdrawal of the suit with permission to file a fresh one.

28 Jan 82

India - Goa

Dr. S. K. Juwarkar VS Dr. Ku. Maria D. P. de Rego

The doctrine of promissory estoppel does not apply when a public officer acts beyond the scope of their authority and arbitrarily, without the knowledge and consent of the Government.

12 Oct 81

India - Goa

The Goa Cancer Society VS Dr. Antonio F. G. Pinto

A government authority has the authority to reconsider its earlier decision to accept a tender, even if it has not yet formally accepted the tender.

23 Jun 81

India - Goa

Narayan Srinivas Fugro VS Samjibhai Bhika Solanki

Non-compliance with the requirements of Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 is not fatal to the petition if there is substantial compliance with the requirement.

16 Jun 81

India - Goa

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. VS The Union of India, New Delhi

Octroi can only be levied on goods imported for consumption within the municipal limits and not on goods re-exported outside the municipal limits.

15 Jun 81

India - Goa

Chandrakant Govind Naik VS Smt. Sugenia Dias e Souza

A tenant must either pay the rent directly or indirectly to the landlord or deposit the same with the Controller in case of refusal by the landlord to accept the payment. Remittance of rent by money ....

15 Jun 81

India - Goa

Mukund Dattaram Shetye VS Slaigappan Alagappan

The owner of a motor vehicle is liable for compensation in the event of an accident caused by the negligent driving of an unauthorized driver, as the driver is presumed to have lawful authority unles....

25 May 81

India - J&K

Mehmood Askari S/o Sheikh Ghulam Ali vs Union of India Through Secretary

The petitioner failed to satisfy the conditions for tax exemption under Section 10(26A) of the Income Tax Act, leading to the upholding of the assessment order.

23 May 25

India - J&K

Union Territory Th. Police Station Chanpora vs Sameer Ahmad Koka

The court affirmed that bail should not be denied solely based on association with a terrorist organization, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for substantial evidence.

23 May 25

India - J&K

Sheikh Showkat vs Ghulam Jeelani Chesti

Objections to property attachment under Section 84 of the Cr. P. C can be raised prior to attachment, and the court must address them without delay.

20 May 25

India - J&K

Mubeen Ahmad Shah vs UT of J&K

The court affirmed that social media posts promoting enmity and threatening violence constitute cognizable offences under IPC, justifying the FIR.

20 May 25

India - J&K

Rajinder Kumar vs State of J&K

A mere breach of promise to marry does not constitute an offence under IPC unless it is shown that the promise was made in bad faith with no intention to adhere to it.

02 May 25

India - J&K

Abdul Gani vs UT of J&K

Failure to issue a final award within two years results in the lapse of land acquisition proceedings under the J&K Land Acquisition Act.

07 Apr 25

India - J&K

Adil Farooq Mir. vs Kashmir Diary Corporate Office at SIDCO, Industrial Estate.

Failure to comply with conditions for leave to defend results in a non-contested decree; compliance is necessary to retain the right to contest.

04 Apr 25

India - J&K

Aditya Malhotra Prop. M/s ANN Infrastructure vs Dharminder Singh

Jurisdiction for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is determined by the location of the bank where the cheque is presented for collection.

03 Apr 25

India - J&K

Suresh Kumar Rekhi S/o late Om Prakash Rekhi vs Directorate of Enforcement

The court established that a distinct list of documents for admission under Section 294 of the CrPC is mandatory, separate from the charge-sheet, and must adhere to the prescribed format for procedur....

03 Apr 25

India - J&K

Rajinder Medical Hall vs State of J&K

The court ruled that acceptance of a make shift shop's terms novated the contract, precluding claims for permanent shop allotment or refund of the initial deposit.

03 Apr 25

India - Uttaranchal

Lal Singh VS State of Uttarakhand

The court can exercise its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court and quash criminal proceedings when justified by the specific tests laid....

13 Feb 14

India - Uttaranchal

Sterling Agro Industrial Ltd. and another Applicants VS State of Uttarakhand

Rule 37 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules prohibits false or misleading statements on labels, and labeling must not be deceptive or false.

12 Feb 14

India - Uttaranchal

Rajesh Rawat VS State of Uttarakhand and others

Compounding of an offence under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 leads to acquittal or discharge of the accused, and no further proceedings shall be taken against such person in respect of the compounded ....

06 Feb 14

India - Uttaranchal

Deepak Bhatt VS State of Uttarakhand

The judgment emphasizes the importance of circumstantial evidence, the burden of proof on the accused to explain facts within their knowledge, and the significance of witness credibility and forensic....

05 Dec 13

India - Uttaranchal

Kunti Devi VS State of Uttaranchal

The victim's consistent testimony and medical evidence proved the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

04 Dec 13

India - Uttaranchal

Dharmendra and another VS Dhani Ram

The judgment established the need for substantial compliance with the requirements of the offense, the limited operation of section 197 to duties discharged in the course of duty, and the protection ....

04 Dec 13

India - Uttaranchal

State of Uttarakhand VS Jauly @ Gori and another

Lack of corroborating evidence and material contradictions in the testimony can lead to the benefit of doubt for the accused.

03 Dec 13

India - Uttaranchal

Savita Popli VS Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited

The court emphasized the need for substantial compliance with the requirements of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the sparing exercise of inherent jurisdiction und....

03 Dec 13

India - Uttaranchal

Harbansh Singh VS State of Uttarakhand

The judgment highlights the importance of substantial and reliable evidence in establishing guilt under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, emphasizing the need for meticulous scrutin....

03 Dec 13

India - Uttaranchal

State of Uttarakhand VS Sanjay and others

The importance of corroborative evidence and the need for consistency and reliability in witness testimony to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases.

03 Dec 13