SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Supreme Court Monthly Digest - 2025-11-11

Subject :

Supreme Court Monthly Digest

Supreme Today News Desk

Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1879
Supreme Court (172)

Lancor Holdings Limited VS Prem Kumar Menon

1) Delay in pronouncement of arbitral award – Delay in delivery of an arbitral award, by itself, is not sufficient to set aside that award – However, each such case would have to be examined on its ow....

Headnote:

(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34 – Delay in pronouncement of arbitral award – Section 34 of Act of 1996 does not postulate delay in delivery of an arbitral award as a ground, in itself, to set it aside – However, inordinate delay in the pronouncement of an arbitral award has several deleterious effects – Delay in delivery of an arbitral award, b...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1877

IN RE: Summoning Advocates who give legal opinion or represent parties during investigation of cases and related issues VS .

1) Summoning of Lawyer by Investigating Agency/ Prosecuting Agency/Police – Investigating agency/prosecuting agency/ police cannot directly summon a Lawyer appearing in a case to elicit details of the....

Headnote:

(A) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 126 [Section 132 of BSA] – Summoning of Lawyer by Investigating Agency/ Prosecuting Agency/Police – No Advocate can be summoned for reason only of giving a legal opinion or appearing for a party in a case – But immunity with respect to professional communications would not absolve liability in the event of an Advocate participating in...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1878

Kimberley Club Pvt. Ltd. VS Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad

Government Contract – In tender matters, court exercising judicial review does not sit in appeal over decision of a tendering authority regarding disqualification of bid – Terms of NIT must be clear a....

Headnote:

Government Contract – Tender – Rejection of technical bid by respondent on the ground that solvency certificate submitted by appellant had not been issued by District Magistrate but has been issued by a private architect – In tender matters, court exercising judicial review does not sit in appeal over decision of a tendering authority regarding disqualification of bid – Only in cases where such de...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1875

Uma Kant VS State of U. P.

Appointment as Assistant Teachers – Services cannot be terminated where appointees are having required minimum educational qualification.

Headnote:

Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 – Section 23 – Appointment as Assistant Teachers – Services of appellants terminated by BSA on the ground that they did not have TET qualification at the time of their appointment – Apart from finding appellants to have not qualified TET, there is no other basis on which appointment of appellants was terminated – Appellants had acquired ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1873

Orion Conmerx Pvt. Ltd. VS National Insurance Co. Ltd.

(1) Insurance – Fire insurance is a strategic tool for risk management, asset protection and economic resilience – Fire insurance policy does not prevent fire but it cushions financial impact when it....

Headnote:

(A) Insurance Act, 1938 – Section 45 – Insurance – Fire insurance is a strategic tool for risk management, asset protection and economic resilience – Fire insurance policy does not prevent fire but it cushions financial impact when it occurs – Contract of fire insurance is a contract to indemnify Insured against loss by fire – Fire must be accidental – Damage from a deliberately set fire will not...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1871

Mohamed Sameer Khan VS State Represented by Inspector of Police

Murder – In absence of any forensic evidence when there is no eyewitness and case is of circumstantial evidence, benefit would go to accused.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 449, 376 and 394 – Murder, house trespass, rape and robbery – Conviction and sentence – Circumstantial evidence – There is no eyewitness to alleged incident – Medical evidence would only point to offence having been committed but prosecution has not been able to connect Appellant to the offence on the basis of medical evid...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1867

Rekha Minocha VS Amit Shah Minocha

Matrimonial dispute – There is no purpose in perpetuating a legal relationship that has ceased to have any meaning.

Headnote:

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – Sections 12, 21 and 22 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 125 – Constitution of India – Article 142 – Matrimonial dispute – Relationship between parties has irretrievably broken down – Parties have been living separately since more than fifteen years now – Attempt at reconciliation through Supreme Court Mediation Centre did not yield an...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1870

Jemaben VS State of Gujarat

Murder – Merely because there are minor discrepancies in version given by prosecution witness with regard to dying declaration and with regard to manner of occurrence of incident, first dying declarat....

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 – Murder – Life imprisonment – Deceased sustained 100% burn injuries and from whole body and clothes of deceased, smell of kerosene was found – However, son of deceased was sleeping beside deceased and he sustained only 10-12% burn injuries – Theory of accidental fire at place of incident put forward by appellant/accused cannot be believed – Dying declaration ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1868

Haribhau @ Bhausaheb Dinkar Kharuse VS State Of Maharashtra

Common object – Once participation and sharing of common object are proved, every member becomes vicariously liable for offences committed in prosecution of that object.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/149, 307/149, 147 and 148 – Murder, attempt to murder and rioting – Common object – Life imprisonment – Acquittal recorded by Trial Court suffered from fundamental misappreciation of evidence – Trial Court overlooked consistent and corroborated testimony of injured eyewitnesses and failed to appreciate legal effect of active participation of appellants as mem...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1872

K. Nagendra VS New India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Death in motor accident – To deny victim/dependents of victim compensation simply because accident took place outside bounds of permit and is outside purview of insurance policy, would be offensive to....

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 66 – Motor Insurance – Route Permit – Deviation – Death in motor accident – Total compensation of Rs.31,84,000/- awarded by High Court with direction to “Pay and Recover” – Purpose of insurance policy in present context is to shield owner/operator from direct liability when such an unforeseen/unfortunate incident takes place – To deny victim/dependents of victim ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1863

Om Pal VS State of U. P. (Now State Of Uttarakhand)

(1) Murder – Non-recovery of weapons cannot be considered fatal to case of prosecution if there is consistent medical and ocular evidence.
(2) Appreciation of evidence – Testimony of an injured eye....

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 read with Sections 149 and 307 [Section 103 read with Sections 190 and 109 of BNS] – Murder and attempt to murder – Common object of unlawful assembly – Life imprisonment – Parties are close relatives – There was long-standing dispute between rival parties due to pending land boundary dispute – Appellants had been aggressor – Nature of injuries as well as ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1859

State of Kerala VS Suni @ Sunil

1) Crime investigation – Procedure to be followed apropos a cognizable offence is vastly different from procedure relating to a non-cognizable offence – Non-cognizable case cannot even be investigated....

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 154, 155 and 156 [Sections 173, 174 and 175 of BNSS] – Crime investigation – Procedure to be followed apropos a cognizable offence is vastly different from procedure relating to a non-cognizable offence – Non-cognizable case cannot even be investigated without order of Magistrate having power to try such case or commit it for tri...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1861

State Election Commission VS Shakti Singh Barthwal

Judicial Decorum – Orderly and dignified functioning of Court is best ensured when Bench and Bar move in symphony with each other.

Headnote:

Judicial Decorum – Once Court has indicated its mind and requested Counsel to refrain from further submissions, same is expected to be respected – Orders are passed by Court only after due consideration – Court is always mindful of submissions advanced and does not dismiss the matters without careful examination – Continued insistence thereafter, especially after Court expr...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1864

P. Somaraju VS State of Andhra Pradesh

(1) Appeal against acquittal – If two reasonable views are possible on the basis of record, acquittal should not be disturbed.
(2) Illegal gratification – Statutory presumption under Section 20 of ....

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 378 and 386 [Sections 419 and 427 of BNSS] – Appeal against acquittal – Appellate Court has full power to review and reappreciate evidence in appeal against acquittal under Sections 378 and 386 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – However, due to reinforced or ‘double’ presumption of innocence after acquittal, interference must be limited – If two reas...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1855

V. M. Saudagar (Dead) Through Legal Heirs VS Divisional Commercial Manager, Central Railway

Dismissal from service – When findings of Enquiry Officer were perverse basing on completely misleading of materials produced before Enquiry Officer, CAT was fully justified in setting aside order of ....

Headnote:

Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 – Rule 3(1)(i) and (ii) – Dismissal from service – No evidence has been adduced to prove the charge of forgery – All charges have not been found to be proved conclusively against appellant – CAT, on the basis of material on record, had rightly interfered with penalty of dismissal from service against appellant – When findings of Enquiry Officer were perverse ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9935

COAL INDIA LIMITED vs APEJAY HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED

Subject: Civil – Appeal

Keywords: Special Leave Petition, Dismissal, High Court, Delay Condoned, Exemption Application, Judgment, Court, Appellant, Respondent, No Grounds

The court upheld the High Court's order, dismissing the Special Leave Petition for lack of sufficient grounds to interfere.

Headnote:

The case revolves around a Special Leave Petition arising from a judgment dated 04-11-2024 from the High Court at Calcutta concerning a dispute involving the appellant. Upon review, the court found no good ground to disturb the High Court's order. The Petitions were dismissed as a result. Issues included the ground for delaying filing the SLP and the necessity of exemption requests. The court reit...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1839

Novenco Building And Industry A/S VS Xero Energy Engineering Solutions Private Ltd.

1) Before a commercial dispute is filed before court, alternative means of resolution of dispute are adopted, so that only the most trying cases come before courts.(2) Court must look beyond time lag ....

Headnote:

(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – Section 12A – Urgent interim relief – Action for infringement of Intellectual Property Rights – Rejection of plaint for non-compliance with Section 12A – Before a commercial dispute is filed before court, alternative means of resolution of dispute are adopted, so that only the most trying cases come before courts – Plaintiff can...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1857

Denash VS State of Tamil Nadu

(1) Release of seized vehicle on Supurdagi pending conclusion of trial – Confiscation, being a measure resulting in deprivation of property, must conform to basic tenets of natural justice and must be....

Headnote:

(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Sections 60 and 63 – Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, 2022 – Rules 17, 20, 21, 22 and 23 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 451 [Section 497 of BNSS] – Release of seized vehicle on Supurdagi pending conclusion of trial – While Rules of 2022 lay down procedure for initiation ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1900

Yadwinder Singh @Sunny VS State Of Punjab

Subject: Criminal Law – Abetment of Suicide

Keywords: quashing, FIR, abetment, suicide, refusal, marriage, instigation, intention, evidence, justice

Refusal to marry does not constitute instigation required under IPC Section 306 for abetment of suicide; clear intention and action must be proven.

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 306 - Quashing of FIR - Appellant sought quashing of FIR alleging abetment of suicide due to refusal to marry - High Court rejected petition - Supreme Court found no ingredients to constitute offense of abetment, affirming that mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation required for Section 306 - Court qu...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9850

UTTAM GAYEN @ GAIN vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Subject: Criminal Law – Appeal against Bail Order

Keywords: appeal, bail, cooperation, investigation, judgment, order, compliance, trial, high court, supreme court

The court emphasized the importance of cooperation in ongoing investigations and judicial proceedings while allowing an appeal against the High Court's decision.

Headnote:

The petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 18.07.2025 in C.R.M.(A) No. 1972/2025 passed by the High Court. The court, upon reviewing the conduct and compliance of the appellant during investigations, allowed the appeal, confirming the order dated 04.09.2025, emphasizing continued cooperation during the judicial process. The impugned order of the High Court was set aside.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9851

THE UNION OF INDIA vs KONDIBA GUNJAL & ANR.

Subject: Criminal Law – Bail

Keywords: bail, Narcotic Drugs Act, pre-trial custody, trial expeditious, High Court order, charges not framed, Union of India, interference, custody duration, serious allegations

The court upheld the High Court's bail order due to prolonged custody without charges, balancing the severity of allegations against the right to timely trial.

Headnote:

This judgment addresses the appeal filed by the Union of India to set aside bail granted to a respondent involved in a narcotics case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court finds that the High Court's decision to grant bail was justified due to the lengthy pre-trial custody of over four years and the absence of framed charges, thus upholding the High Court's orde...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9862

NIRMALKUMAR KISHORBHAI MARU & ANR. vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

Subject: Employment Law – Contract Employment

Keywords: contract employees, regularization, replacement, discretion, experience, High Court, objectivity, claim rejection, status quo, petitions dismissed

Authorities must exercise discretion objectively when replacing contract employees, taking experience into account.

Headnote:

The judgment discussed the rejection of regularization claims by contract employees (petitioners) and set aside a status quo order. The court acknowledged the petitioners' experience but did not permit regularization, allowing authorities discretion in replacement, provided they act objectively. The verdict noted that existing employees should not be replaced without justification. The special lea...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1829

Kannaiya VS State of Madhya Pradesh

Murder – Suppression of genesis of occurrence and shifting of place of incident demolish very substratum of prosecution case.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/34 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Constitution of India – Article 142 – Murder – Common intention – Life imprisonment – Parties belong to rival political factions – In FIR, there is no reference to presence of so-called eye witness at crime scene – Incident took place in a small village where everyone is known to each other – Fact that nam...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9903

KIRLOSKAR PROPRIETARY LIMITED vs KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LIMITED

Subject: Commercial Law – Intellectual Property

Keywords: trademark, injunction, license, assignment, corporate, appeal, stay, group company, rights, court order

The court addressed the balance between trademark rights and corporate group practices regarding licenses and assignments, ruling to stay the modified injunction pending appeal review.

Headnote:

The primary legal question relates to the application of temporary injunction regarding the use of trademarks within corporate groups. The High Court initially allowed a request for injunction preventing the appellant from creating third-party interests in trademarks, but this was subsequently expanded. The court has stayed the operation of the modified injunction order while noting certain incons...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9848

PUNAM DEVI @ RUPAN DEVI & ANR. vs THE STATE OF BIHAR

Subject: Criminal Law – Bail Matters

Keywords: bail, cooperation, investigation, High Court, Supreme Court, appeal, conditions, order, disposal, verdict

The court underscored the importance of cooperation in investigations and affirmed the ability to set conditions on bail to ensure compliance.

Headnote:

This judgment pertains to Criminal Appeal No.4581 of 2025 arising from SLP (Crl.) No.12992 of 2025. The appellants challenge the order dated 17.07.2025 by the High Court of Judicature at Patna. The court confirms the earlier order allowing bail to the appellants, emphasizing their cooperation in the ongoing investigation and prohibiting unnecessary adjournments. The court sets aside the impugned o...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9853

USHA GOPIRATHNAM & ORS. vs K. R. CHOUDARY & ORS.

Subject: Civil Procedure – Property Law

Keywords: Conveyance Deed, execution, judgment compliance, registration, legal obligations, court directives, parties' cooperation, identified area, land records, document requirements

The court mandates the timely execution of the Conveyance Deed in compliance with earlier judgments and instructions to the registering authorities.

Headnote:

The court examined the necessity for the execution of the Conveyance Deed as per the judgment dated 23.09.2022 concerning Civil Appeal No. 2741 of 2009, noting the non-execution was due to the unavailability of certain documents. The court confirmed the area for handover has been identified pursuant to its earlier orders and determined the Registering Authorities must register the Conveyance Deed ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9916

SUNITA MUKESHBHAI PATANI & ORS. vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Subject: Criminal Law – Appeal Proceedings

Keywords: suicide, FIR, investigation, harassment, abeament, interim order, personal bond, cooperation, evidence, witness

Legal interpretation of abetment of suicide regarding harassment allegations under local laws.

Headnote:

The petition revolved around the implications of a First Information Report lodged due to allegations related to abetment of suicide against the petitioners, namely, Sunita Mukeshbhai Patani and others. The court considered the actions taken under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, emphasizing that withdrawal of earlier legal challenges does not bar ongoing investigations. Key is...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9918

VINITA KALA vs MANOJ MASIWAL

Subject: Civil – Family Law

Keywords: transfer, divorce, jurisdiction, family court, petition, allow, convenience, court, proceedings, Mumbai

Transfer of divorce proceedings justified for jurisdictional convenience under Family Courts Act.

Headnote:

Under the Family Courts Act, the petitioner seeks the transfer of Divorce Suit Petition No. A-562/2025 from Mumbai to Dehradun, asserting the need for jurisdictional convenience. The Court finds merit in the petition, thus allowing the transfer. The final order reaffirms the transfer of jurisdiction.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9919

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION vs RAJEEV KUMAR

Subject: Criminal Law – Appeals

Keywords: anticipatory bail, appeal, High Court, disposal, independent merits, hearing, Special Leave Petition, Contempt Petition, final judgment, legal reasoning

The Special Leave Petition challenging anticipatory bail is found not warranting further proceedings.

Headnote:

The case concerns an appeal from the High Court of Calcutta (CRM No. 9230/2019 dated 01-10-2019) regarding anticipatory bail granted. The court determined that the Special Leave Petition does not merit continuation. It reiterated that pending applications shall be disposed of alongside handling other petitions independently after eight weeks.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9897

RAJEEB KALITA vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Subject: Public Interest Litigation – Sanitation and Accessibility

Keywords: sanitation, toilets, public interest, judicial premises, accessibility, compliance, oversight, committee, fund allocation, gender inclusion

Court mandated improved sanitation facilities across judicial premises, addressing systemic failures and ensuring accessibility for all users.

Headnote:

In the context of a Public Interest Litigation regarding sanitation facilities in all Courts/Tribunals, the Supreme Court issued several key directives aimed at improving the accessibility and maintenance of toilet facilities. The Court emphasized the necessity for separate washrooms for different genders and PwD. It also required committees to be formed for oversight and implementation of these f...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9910

SHIVA KOHLI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Subject: Criminal – Bail

Keywords: bail, incarceration, minor, prosecutrix, appeal, High Court, rejection, dispute

Prolonged incarceration of an appellant and disputed minor status of the prosecutrix warrants bail consideration.

Headnote:

The appeal concerns a bail application following the rejection of regular bail by the High Court connected to FIR No. 492/2024. The Court determined the appellant's prolonged incarceration and the disputed age of the prosecutrix warranted bail. The decision cited that the case's nature did not negate the bail grant as a consideration of the victim's age arose. The appeal is thus accepted, and the ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9917

S. KRISHNA KUMAR vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Subject: Criminal Law – Appeal

Keywords: currency, allegations, implication, investigation, release, conditions, bond, witnesses, evidence, misappropriation

Court recognized the implausibility of allegations regarding currency replacement, granting conditional release.

Headnote:

The court evaluated allegations against the petitioner regarding currency note replacement to misappropriate funds amounting to Rs. 6,74,047. It concluded that such allegations were difficult to accept as they lacked plausibility. The court framed the issue of false implication and granted conditional release pending investigation. The final outcome provided for the petitioner's release on bond wi...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9849

ASHOK KUMAR vs THE STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

Subject: Criminal Law – Anticipatory Bail

Keywords: anticipatory bail, compliance, investigation, judgment, court ruling, appeal, order, cooperation, law, legal conduct

The court reaffirmed the importance of compliance with conditions during investigations while allowing the appeal against anticipatory bail.

Headnote:

The court analyzed the merits of the appeal against an anticipatory bail order under Section 482, finding the appellant to have complied with conditions during investigations. The court's ruling emphasized the necessity for adherence to lawful conduct throughout proceedings. Ultimately, the original order was set aside. The appeal was allowed as per the signed order.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9861

KANANBALA KASHYAP vs PAWAN KISHOR

Subject: Civil – Family Law

Keywords: transfer petition, divorce case, Hindu Marriage Act, convenience, mediation, court order, parenting, jurisdiction, accessibility, mutual consent

The court permits case transfer under the Hindu Marriage Act for convenience due to logistical challenges faced by a parent.

Headnote:

(i) Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, pertains to divorce petitions based on mutual consent. The petitioner seeks the transfer of Divorce Case No. 1862 of 2024 from Gautam Budh Nagar to Bangalore due to the inconvenience caused by travel for a mother with a young child. The court finds merit in this request. (ii) The main issue framed was the necessity to facilitate the petitione...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9892

AKASHDEEP vs SMRITI KAUSHAL & ORS.

Subject: Family Law – Matrimonial Settlement

Keywords: amicable settlement, divorce, mutual consent, alimony, custody, property transfer, children's rights, dissolution of marriage, litigation closure, financial arrangement

Mutual consent in matrimonial disputes allows parties to amicably settle all claims, including alimony and custody.

Headnote:

The Court highlighted the benefits of amicable dispute resolution under the relevant matrimonial laws stating that both parties agreed to settle their matrimonial discord by mutual consent, including the dissolution of marriage and settlement terms as detailed. The key issues framed were the terms of dissolution and settlement claims, establishing that agreements regarding alimony and custody were...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9904

GAJANAN VASANT KHADE vs KAVITA GAJANAN KHADE

Subject: Civil – Virtual Appearance

Keywords: virtual appearance, application, delay, trial court, directions, hearing, petitioners, disposed, concerned court, order

The court confirms the authority of the Trial Court to permit virtual appearances in pending cases, emphasizing timely decisions on such requests.

Headnote:

The judgment pertains to the applications IA No. 106424/2025 and IA No. 106417/2025, concerning permission for virtual appearance in ongoing proceedings. The court emphasized the need for the concerned Trial Court to expedite the decision on the petitioners' request, following statutory procedures. The court found merit in addressing the delay and provided directions for resolving the matter promp...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9926

IFCI LIMITED vs ACCIL HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED

Subject: Civil Law – Securitization and Debt Recovery

Keywords: Securitisation, High Court, Auction Notice, Debt Assignment, Resolution Plan, Legal Proceedings, Timely Hearing, Financial Liabilities, Special Leave Petition, Justice

Timely disposal of civil writ petitions to avoid hindrance in the sale of secured assets is crucial under the Securitisation Act.

Headnote:

The court analyzed the provisions under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, reviewing petitions that challenged Auction Notices related to debt assignment. It found that delays in hearing the petitions potentially hinder the sale of secured assets. The court urged timely resolution of the civil writ petitions. The Special Leave ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9928

STATE OF U.P. & ANR. vs RATNESH SAXENA & ANR.

Subject: Civil – Appeal

Keywords: retiral benefits, interest, delay, compliance, judgment, Court, petition, dismissed, order, liberty

The court determined the necessity of balancing compliance with interest payments against delays caused by retirees in seeking redress.

Headnote:

In this case, the petitioner contended that the learned Single Judge mandated an 8% interest on the arrears of retiral benefits. The court found that most benefits were paid and instructed that remaining interest must be cleared in four weeks but allowed a plea on delays by retirees. The special leave petition was disposed of accordingly.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9878

DHARMINDER KUMAR & ORS. vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Subject: Civil Matters – Appeals

Keywords: Special Leave Petition, delay condonation, exemption, notice issued, procedural fairness, counter affidavit, rejoinder, application approval, judicial proceedings, court order

Court allows several Special Leave Petitions while condoning delays and issuing notices, ensuring procedural fairness in appeal processes.

Headnote:

The court considered various Special Leave Petitions including those arising from the High Court's conclusions on multiple appeal numbers. The main legal issues involved were procedural aspects including delay in filing and the necessity for notice in several matters. The court granted permission for filing SLPs, condoned delays, and issued directions regarding counter affidavits and rejoinders.


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1824

Legislative Council U. P. Lucknow VS Sushil Kumar

CBI investigation – Mere sweeping remarks are not enough to direct for CBI investigation, until prima facie disclosure of commission of criminal offence is made out – Directions for CBI enquiry should....

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 32/226 – Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 – Section 6 – CBI investigation – Parameters – Mere sweeping remarks are not enough to direct for CBI investigation, until prima facie disclosure of commission of criminal offence is made out – Directions for CBI enquiry should not be ordered by High Courts or Supreme Court in a routine manner – CBI investigation...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1827

Zoharbee VS Imam Khan (D) Thr. Lrs.

Agreement to sell does not confer any rights nor does it vest any interest into party that agrees thereby to buy a particular property – Transfer of immovable property by way of sale can only be by a ....

Headnote:

(A) Agreement to Sell – Legal Sanctity – Agreement to sell does not confer any rights nor does it vest any interest into party that agrees thereby to buy a particular property – Transfer of immovable property by way of sale can only be by a deed of conveyance (sale deed) – In absence of a deed of conveyance (duly stamped and registered as required by law), no right, title or interest in an immovab...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9906

BOONETI CHANAKYA @ PRAKASH @ CHANU vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.

Subject: Criminal Law – Bail Proceedings

Keywords: bail, personal liberty, Article 21, timely hearing, high court order, separation of hearings, cancellation of bail, court's approval, expedited processing, judicial discretion

The court emphasized the importance of timely hearings in bail applications in line with personal liberty under Article 21.

Headnote:

The Special Leave Petition arises from an order of the High Court directing the Special Judge to await the High Court's decision on a related bail matter. Court found the High Court's order unsatisfactory, asserting the necessity for separate hearings on the bail applications, emphasizing the significance of personal liberty as enshrined in Article 21. The Special Leave Petition was consequently d...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9911

NISHAT IMTEYAZ @ NISHAT IMAM vs MD. ALI IMAM

Subject: Civil – Family Law

Keywords: transfer petition, maintenance case, mediation, family court, Patna, New Delhi, Court ruling, legal procedure, justice, interlocutory application

Court mandates transfer of maintenance case for fair proceedings.

Headnote:

The petitioner filed for transfer under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to move a maintenance case from Patna to New Delhi. Mediation efforts failed, leading to the court allowing the transfer petition. The court reasoned that a transfer was essential for justice. The transfer petition was allowed in line with the signed order.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9886

TULASIKANNU vs AMMAVASAI & ANR.

Subject: Civil Law – Property Law

Keywords: attachment, property, doctrine of lis pendens, fraudulent transfer, legal principle, court ruling, expedited proceedings, valid order, high court, trial court

The doctrine of lis pendens does not apply unless the suit directly concerns rights in the property involved.

Headnote:

The court examined the applicability of the doctrine of lis pendens and fraudulent transfers under relevant sections of the Transfer of Property Act and Code of Civil Procedure, concluding that the High Court's ruling on the attachment order was flawed. The fundamental issue revolved around whether the attachment was valid under applicable laws. The court ruled to restore the trial court's attachm...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9872

SHAALINI(DECEASED) & ORS. vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.

Subject: Criminal Law – Appeals

Keywords: quash petition, FIR, lack of evidence, IPC, affiliation, legal interpretation, appeal allowed, Madras High Court, justice, Code of Criminal Procedure

The Court upheld the quashing of an FIR due to insufficient evidence supporting allegations of fraud.

Headnote:

The appeal concerns the interpretation of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as applied in rejecting a quash petition by the Madras High Court. The appellants contest the legitimacy of FIR No. 265 of 2012 alleging offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the IPC based on lack of corroborating documentation of the Institute’s affiliation. The Court finds that the High Court's dismi...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9905

SAJJALA SRIDHAR REDDY vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Subject: Criminal Law – Bail Applications

Keywords: bail, personal liberty, Article 21, delay, High Court, merits, disposal, decision, procedure, hearing

Bail applications must be decided based on their own merits without unnecessary delays, respecting personal liberty under Article 21.

Headnote:

The judgment analyzes the legal premises surrounding the grant of bail, emphasizing that the court should decide bail applications based on individual merits, as per Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court disapproves of an earlier High Court order mandating postponement of such decisions. The final decision reaffirms the importance of timely hearings in relation to personal liberty and clarifie...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9900

GOPAL CHAUHAN ETC. vs BAR COUNCIL OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA & ANR.

Subject: Civil Law – Appellate Jurisdiction

Keywords: withdrawal, disciplinary proceedings, Bar Council, review petition, appeal, legal representation, interlocutory applications, court order, delay condonation

The court allows withdrawal of an appeal with liberty to file a Review Petition before the Bar Council to address unresolved issues.

Headnote:

The court considered the appeal concerning the disciplinary proceedings against the appellants conducted by the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana. The appellants contended that issues raised before the Bar Council of India were not addressed. Permission was granted to withdraw the appeal to file a Review Petition. The court determined the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty for future p...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9909

SANJAYBHAI CHHIMABHAI PATEL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

Subject: Civil Law – Appeals

Keywords: permission, appeal, delay, condonation, service, notice, justice, procedural, grounds, court

The Court reaffirmed the need to allow procedural justice by granting permission to appeal despite delays.

Headnote:

The court analyzed the procedural requirements for appeals under relevant statutes, affirming the facts of the case concerning the applications for condonation of delay. The court found that sufficient grounds were presented for the delay in filing. The primary issues involved ensuring proper service of notice and compliance with procedural rules. The court's reasoning emphasized the necessity of ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9914

M/S BPTP LTD. vs M/S YASH CONSTRUCTIONS

Subject: Civil – Arbitration

Keywords: arbitration, litigation, appointment, dispute, resolution, court, judgment, finality, negligence, consideration

The court emphasized the necessity and efficiency of arbitration in resolving ongoing disputes between the parties.

Headnote:

The present civil appeal arises from the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which initially allowed the appointment of an arbitrator for dispute resolution. The Supreme Court examined the necessity of arbitration and appointed a sole arbitrator to finalize the dispute, stating, 'the matter can be referred to sole arbitra...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9887

DIWAKAR PRASAD DWIVEDI & ORS. vs ALOK RANJAN & ORS.

Subject: Civil – Contempt of Court

Keywords: delay, clarification, jurisdiction, Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court, execution, awards, disposal, application, court order

Clarification on jurisdiction between Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court concerning pre-existing awards under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Headnote:

The matter addresses various legal provisions concerning contempt and workers' rights, specifically under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, relevant to the adjudication of claims. The court clarified that claims should be approached through the Industrial Tribunal unless pre-existing facts necessitate the Labour Court’s jurisdiction for execution under Section 33C. The application was ultimately ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9902

MAHIMA ANJALI SINGER vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Subject: Civil – Appeal

Keywords: Leave India Notice, interim stay, restoration, Writ Petition, expeditious adjudication, legal representation, High Court, appeal, jurisdiction, final judgment

The restoration of an interim stay does not imply a ruling on the merits of the case and requires legal representation for procedural fairness.

Headnote:

The court considered the implications of the Leave India Notice served to the appellant and the subsequent High Court judgment vacating the interim stay. The court restored the interim stay pending final adjudication. The ruling emphasizes the necessity of legal representation to ensure a fair hearing. The High Court is instructed to expedite the decision on the Writ Petition No.1091/2021.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9885

VANDANA vs STATE OF H.P. & ANR.

Subject: Criminal Law – Special Leave Petition

Keywords: special leave, interim stay, counter affidavit, rejoinder, hearing date, High Court, proceedings, judgment, petitioner, respondent

The court permits the continuation of an interim stay pending further proceedings.

Headnote:

This judgment pertains to a Special Leave to Appeal regarding an order from the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The petitioner, in this case, seeks relief from a lower court's decision. The court acknowledges the need for further time for the respondent to file a counter affidavit and allows a rejoinder from the petitioner. The interim stay previously ordered will remain in effect until the next h...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1818

Manorma Sinha VS Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Death in motor accident – While computing compensation, essmoluments and benefits accruing to deceased under various heads for the purposes of computation of loss of income, ought to be included irres....

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Sections 168 and 173 – Death in motor accident – Compensation awarded by MACT reduced by High Court from Rs. 88,20,454/- to Rs. 38,15,499/- – High Court while computing compensation, has excluded allowances payable as per last pay slip and gave future prospects at the rate of 40% in place of 50% as was given by Tribunal – Besides, High Court made flat deduction of 30% to...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9888

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs MUKESH SHARMA & ORS.

Subject: Civil Law – Appeal and Land Law

Keywords: Justice, Entitlement, Landowners, Compensation, Reference Court, Ruling, Procedure, Applications, Dispute Resolution, Accessibility

The court emphasized procedural accessibility allowing affected landowners to seek entitlement determinations effectively following prior rulings.

Headnote:

The Supreme Court analyzed the implications of its prior order dated 28.03.2025 regarding land entitlement disputes faced by affected landowners. The applicants sought clarification on processes for dissatisfied landowners to approach the Reference Court for actual entitlement determination. The court clarified orders to ensure efficiency in resolving similar claims. The findings recognized the ri...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9871

ABHILASHA DWIVEDI & ANR. vs ASHOK DWIVEDI

Subject: Criminal Law – Transfer of Cases

Keywords: transfer, petition, merit, Section 125 Cr.P.C., Section 128 Cr.P.C., dismissed, video conferencing, court order, jurisdiction, hearing

Transfer petitions under Section 125 and Section 128 Cr.P.C. are subject to court discretion based on merit and precedent.

Headnote:

The petitioners sought to transfer a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and an Execution Petition under Section 128 Cr.P.C. from New Delhi to Surat, Gujarat. The Court considered the merits of the petitions and previously dismissed a related transfer petition, ultimately ruling that the petitions lacked merit. The Court denied the transfer requests, but allowed for video conferencing facilities du...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9901

RAJMAL @ RAJESH CHANDANMAL LUNIYA & ANR. vs PANKAJ AMRUTLAL NAVALAKHA & ORS.

Subject: Civil Law – Civil Procedure

Keywords: CIVIL APPEAL, amendment, plaint, due diligence, suit, order, High Court, Trial Court, consequential relief, expeditious

Court allowed amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, affirming the necessity to enable consequential relief in pending suits.

Headnote:

In applying Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, the court finds that the amendment to the plaint does not alter the nature of the suit. The refusal for amendment was based on misinterpretations regarding due diligence and consistency with existing claims. Consequently, the appeal is allowed, setting aside previous orders, enabling plaintiffs to amend their plaint, subject to timely proceedings.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9864

E.R. KUMAR & ANR. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Subject: Public Interest Litigation – Writ Petition

Keywords: Writ Petition, Union of India, hearing, justice, rights, judicial remedy, legal process, procedures, vacation, order

The court emphasized the necessity of due legal procedures in adjudicating challenges to governmental actions affecting individual rights.

Headnote:

This judgment pertains to Writ Petition (Civil) No. 55/2003 challenging certain actions by the Union of India under the relevant provisions of statutory law. The Petitioners argued that their rights were infringed upon leading to their seek for a judicial remedy. The Court found in favor of listing the matter post-vacation, allowing due legal process to take its course. The main issues framed cent...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9867

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA vs CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.

Subject: Civil Law – Procedural Law

Keywords: civil appeal, procedure, notice, intervention, order, service, court hearing, legal counsel, directions, application

The court addressed procedural applications in a civil appeal context and emphasized the significance of notice issuance and service methods.

Headnote:

The judgment concerns the proceedings of Civil Appeal No. 4235/2014 under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The Court analyzed multiple applications related to this case, including requests for intervention and appropriate orders. The bench issued notice for one application and permitted dasti service. The outcome reflects due procedural scrutiny.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9894

SHIBU TA & ORS. vs STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Subject: Administrative Law – Public Employment

Keywords: qualifications, merit list, delay condoned, notice, interlocutory applications, equivalence, service, counter affidavit, exclusion, legal principle

Equivalence principle in qualification leads to exclusion from merit list despite meeting standards.

Headnote:

Clause- 7 of the Advertisement dated 28.01.2015 regarding qualifications was discussed. The petitioners argued that candidates not meeting the qualifications should not have been included in the merit list, while they were excluded despite meeting the standards. The Court condoned the delay in filing and issued notice returnable on 21.11.2025 requiring the respondents to file counter affidavits an...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9933

GUNJAN GUPTA vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

Subject: Civil – Land and Property

Keywords: settlement, appeal, land access, construction, writ petition, agreement, legal rights, court order, dispute resolution, partial allowance

The court validated the mutual settlement agreement as integral to the case outcome, facilitating land access and construction rights.

Headnote:

The appeal pertains to a judgment by the High Court dismissing the appellant's writ petition against an administrative order. The court acknowledges the mutual settlement agreement reached by the parties which affects access and rights related to land and construction. The appeal garners a partial allowance reflecting the settlement's terms as pivotal to the resolution.


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1811

Alan Mervyn Arthur Stephenson VS J. Xavier Jayarajan

Appointment of Arbitrator – Arbitrator cannot be appointed to adjudicate a time-barred claim.

Headnote:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11(5) – Appointment of Arbitrator – Money dispute – As on date of notice, claim for recovery of amounts was barred by limitation – Even notice of arbitration was delayed and barred by limitation and arbitration request itself was made two years after initial notice – Arbitration Petition seeking appointment of Arbitrator stands dismissed. (Paras 3, ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9890

SJVN LIMITED vs M/S PATEL GAMMON JOINT VENTURE

Subject: Civil Law – Appeals

Keywords: appeal, legal provision, High Court, triable issues, reinstated, order, merits, decision, application, CPC

The court reinstated the prior order recognizing the existence of triable issues while correcting the procedural oversight of the lower court.

Headnote:

The legal provision invoked involves Order VII Rule 11, CPC, wherein the High Court, in its order dated 23.12.2024, set aside the earlier judgement from 15.12.2023 allowing the respondent's application. The court highlighted that there are triable issues in the underlying suit and emphasized that the matter should be remitted to the High Court for a decision including all arguments from both parti...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9921

DEEPAK CHANDRA vs UTTARAKHAND COOPERATIVE ELECTION TRIBUNAL & ORS.

Subject: Election Law – Interim Relief

Keywords: interim order, election notification, justice, expeditious, High Court, statutory duty, Special Leave Petition, merits, contentions, disposal

Interim orders must balance procedural justice with statutory responsibilities.

Headnote:

Statute Analysis: This case involves a Special Leave Petition regarding an interim order under Special Appeal No. 16/2025. Facts: The petition was prompted by an interim order from the High Court concerning election notifications issued post-amendment. Underlying these issues, the Court aimed to ensure justice was served by confirming prior interim orders. Findings: The Court has not commented on ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9865

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. vs AMAL CHANDRA DAS

Subject: Civil – Administrative Law

Keywords: appeal, judgment, procedural, administrative, court, WPO, WPA, hearing, directions, legal

The judgment clarifies procedural guidelines and review standards for judicial appeals in administrative law contexts.

Headnote:

The court examined the petitioners' appeal pursuant to several specific leave requests arising from various WPO and WPA cases. The findings addressed the legality of prior decisions rendered by the High Court. Critical issues framed pertained to judicial interpretations impacting administrative actions. Ultimately, the order directed the matters be listed for further hearing.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9863

GOA FOUNDATION vs UNION OF INDIA

Subject: Civil – Public Interest Litigation

Keywords: environmental concerns, writ petition, statutory compliance, hearing date, judicial review, public interest, legal interpretation, application for permission, court's observations, future hearings

The court reaffirms procedural adherence in environmental petitions, ensuring legislative intent is observed in future hearings.

Headnote:

The Court considered the statutory requirements under the pertinent laws and reviewed the facts surrounding writ petition (civil) no. 435/2012, asserting significant environmental concerns by the petitioner. The court framed pivotal issues surrounding statutory compliance and interpreted legislative intent, concluding that the case would be listed for hearing on 04.11.2025.


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1812

State Of Madhya Pradesh VS Janved Singh

(1) Dowry death – When accused offers a false explanation regarding cause of death which takes place within confines of his house, such falsity becomes additional link in chain of circumstances pointi....

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 304B, 498A and 201 – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 106 – Dowry death, cruelty and disappearance of evidence – Appeal against acquittal – Circumstantial evidence – Conviction for murder can solely rest on circumstantial evidence if chain of circumstances is complete and consistent only with hypothesis of guilt of accused – Traditional rule relating ...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9920

IMRAN KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Subject: Criminal Law – Narcotic Drugs Offences

Keywords: bail, conviction, narcotic drugs, evidence, contraband, examination, defense, court order, high court, interception

The court established that an examination of individual roles in narcotics cases is essential in bail considerations.

Headnote:

The court analyzed the petitions for special leave to appeal concerning an appeal against conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The facts reveal the interception of a vehicle carrying contraband and subsequent conviction confirmed by the High Court. Primarily, the Court framed issues on the role of accused and reasoning concerning bail applications. Ultimately, it wa...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9873

SONAM SHARMA vs ARSHIYA BAKSHI (Through her Father)

Subject: Criminal – Transfer Petition

Keywords: transfer petition, Section 125, dismissed, jurisdiction, Family Court, video conference, Haryana, Bangalore, petition, grounds

Transfer applications under procedural law require significant justification which was not found in this case.

Headnote:

This transfer petition seeks the relocation of a proceeding initiated under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure from one Family Court to another jurisdiction. The Court concludes there are no grounds for the transfer, thus dismissing the petition. The issue at hand is whether video conference facilities may be utilized for appearance on non-effective hearing dates. In conclusion, the tra...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9869

M/S P.K. NAIDU AND CO. vs UNION OF INDIA

Subject: Civil – Contract

Keywords: arbitration, demand notice, lease, government action, legal compliance, judgment, court observation, request for renewal, tender process, successful bidder

The court established that arbitration proceedings will resolve disputes over the demand notice and the lessee's entitlement to renew the lease in line with established rules.

Headnote:

This case pertains to a petition for special leave to appeal against a final judgment of the High Court concerning a demand notice issued based on certain observations. The court clarifies that the validity of the demand notice and related issues will be adjudicated by an arbitrator, and the petitioner's entitlement to lease renewal is addressed, referencing specific notifications. The notices and...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9927

SARELLA @ TALARI MADHURI & ANR. vs TALARI RAMESH & ANR.

Subject: Family Law – Maintenance

Keywords: maintenance, adjustment, welfare, appeal, court order, child support, reduction, rights, judgment, appeal outcome

Court has the authority to adjust maintenance payments based on circumstances and welfare considerations.

Headnote:

The appeal addressed the reduction of maintenance from Rs.30,000/- to Rs.20,000/- by the High Court. The court found that Rs.25,000/- would be adequate for the child's welfare and mandated its full allocation by the working appellant. The court's verdict partly allowed the appeal, modifying the earlier order accordingly.


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1807

Rahul Agarwal VS State of West Bengal

Voice Sample – Direction to give voice sample do not offend Right against Self-Incrimination.

Headnote:

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 349 – Constitution of India – Article 20(3) – Voice Sample – Direction to give voice sample on touchstone of Right against Self-Incrimination – Despite absence of explicit provisions in Cr.P.C., Judicial Magistrate must be conceded power to order a person, to give a sample of his voice for the purpose of investigation for a crime – Rule against se...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9895

PARIHAR MINERAL PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

Subject: Civil – Special Leave Petition

Keywords: mining, interlocutory application, Mines Act, seized vehicles, expedited handling, judicial orders, violations, PIL, High Court, special leave petition

The court emphasized expedited consideration of interlocutory applications related to mining violations under the Mines and Minerals Act.

Headnote:

This case involved a special leave petition by the petitioners seeking release of seized vehicles related to mining operations. The court referred to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and noted that the High Court's ongoing PIL addresses gross violations in mining conduct. The court urged expedited handling of the interlocutory application and referenced previous order...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1806

State of West Bengal VS Santi Ceramics Pvt. Limited

Restoration of acquired land – Benefits of quashing do not accrue to persons who were not parties unless Court has struck down entire acquisition on fundamental grounds applicable to all – Permitting ....

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Sections 4 and 5-A – Restoration of acquired land to original landowners/cultivators – Restoration remedy was conceived for disadvantaged farming communities, not as general restitution for all affected parties – Even established procedural principles preclude Respondent No.1’s claim – Orders quashing acquisition proceedings may operate either in personam or in rem – B...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9922

SANJAY PRASAD vs SURENDRA SINGH & ANR.

Subject: Civil – Procedural Matters

Keywords: delay, contempt, stay, order, deferral, application, judgment, High Court, petition, fundamental rights

Court defers contempt proceedings pending state application decision, waiving notice as no adverse order is issued.

Headnote:

The judgment discusses the procedural issues surrounding the filing of contempt proceedings. The court finds that as no order prejudicial to the respondent(s) is being passed, notice to the respondent(s) is waived and defers contempt proceedings until the stay application by the State is decided, directing expeditious handling of the matter within three months. The petitions are disposed of accord...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9896

RAM NARESH SINGH & ANR. vs JAI BHARAT MANI ACHARYA DIXIT & ORS.

Subject: Civil – Miscellaneous Applications

Keywords: permission, delay condoned, interlocutory applications, High Court, directions, disposed, judicial efficiency, court order, legal procedure, miscellaneous application

The court's discretion to condone delay and direct procedural follow-up by the High Court supports judicial efficiency and case management.

Headnote:

The miscellaneous application for permission was granted and delay in filing was condoned. The Court directed the High Court Registry to inform the Chief Justice regarding the previous order passed by this Court on 10.04.2018 for necessary directions. The miscellaneous application and pending interlocutory applications were disposed of.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9923

THE MAHARASHTRA STATE SAHAKARI BANK LTD MUMBAI, BRANCH MAHAL, NAGPUR vs FAIJULLAKHA AMIRKHA PATHAN & ORS.

Subject: Civil Law – Appeal

Keywords: special leave, appeal, legal framework, high court, court decisions, reserved judgment, merit, litigation, dispute, orders

The court determined the merit of the appeal concerning the legality of contested orders under relevant provisions.

Headnote:

This judgment concerns Special Leave to Appeal arising from a decision of the High Court. The court considers the relevant legal framework as per applicable laws and summarizes the facts regarding the petitioner and respondent's dispute. The court initially framed issues about the legality of the contested orders and subsequently held that the appeal had merit, leading to the reserved judgment.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9868

MD. SAMEER RAO vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

Subject: Civil Law – Personal Status

Keywords: name change, official records, petition, law, judgment, court order, academic certificates, precedent, writ petition, legal rights

Individual's right to change name in official records, supported by similar precedents.

Headnote:

Statute Analysis: The case discusses the right of an individual to change their name within official records, referencing the regulations of the Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad. Facts of the Case: The petitioner’s request to change his name was denied by the Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad despite a legal publication. Findings of Court: The court found the case justified in allowing the name change based on...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9879

SUDHA DEVI @ SUDHA VERMA & ANR. vs SEEMA JAISWAL & ANR.

Subject: Civil – Execution of Decrees

Keywords: appeal, execution, decree, offer, compromise, court, petition, respondents, determination, resolution

The Executing Court is responsible for determining compliance with a compromise decree, especially regarding offers made in execution cases.

Headnote:

The court analyzed the petition for Special Leave to Appeal regarding an execution case linked to a compromise decree. It found that the petitioners offered a resolution aligned with the compromise; however, the respondents contested it. The court ruled that these matters must be determined by the Executing Court, instructing that the court should decide within six months whether the petitioners' ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1799

S. K. Jain VS Union of India

Compulsory retirement – An which is prejudicial to good order and military discipline, cannot be left unpunished.

Headnote:

Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 – Section 15 – Army Act, 1950 – Sections 63, 69 and 70 – Army Rules, 1950 – Section 62(4) – Compulsory retirement from service by way of punishment – Concurrent findings of fact with regard to recovery of ammunition from possession of appellant, have been recorded after meticulous appreciation of evidence on record – Factual foundation brought on record at trial, cl...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9924

S. Sathish Kumar & Ors. vs Sandeep Jain & Ors.

Subject: Corporate Law – Contempt of Court

Keywords: contempt, status quo, NCLAT, Corporate Debtor, Resolution Plan, hearing, appeal, operation, financial transactions, judgment

Status quo must be maintained pending decision, with strict conditions outlined, despite contempt allegations.

Headnote:

In the contempt petition filed by employees of the corporate debtor, the Supreme Court acknowledged the filing due to alleged violations of prior orders of the NCLAT. The Court determined that existing status quo must remain until the NCLAT's final decision. The Court did not determine the contempt but emphasized cooperation with the NCLAT. The Court directed that status quo as of 6 September 2024...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9932

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, UP vs M/S ASHISH AUTOMOBILES

Subject: Taxation – Sales Tax

Keywords: manufacture, tax liability, purchase tax, new product, fabricated body, U.P. Sales Tax Act, chassis, legal interpretation, court order, appeal outcome

The assembly of a fabricated body on a chassis qualifies as manufacture, incurring tax liability under specified sections of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.

Headnote:

1. The case concerns the interpretation of the U.P. Sales Trade Tax Act, 1948, specifically regarding whether mounting a fabricated body on a three-wheeler chassis constitutes the manufacture of a new commodity, attracting purchase tax liability under Section 3-AAAA of the Act. The court found that such assembly did indeed create a new product, affirming the obligation for purchase tax. 2. The mai...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9899

GEHNA ANAND vs PRADEEP KUMAR

Subject: Criminal Law – Transfer of Cases

Keywords: transfer, jurisdiction, interest of justice, court order, hearing, petition, application, exemption, video conferencing, law

The court, under Section 447 of the relevant statute, has the authority to transfer cases to serve the interests of justice.

Headnote:

Under Section 447 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks to transfer case MJC-R No. 796 of 2022 from Family Court, Gwalior to Chief Judicial Magistrate, UT Chandigarh. The court finds that transfer serves the interest of justice and accordingly allows the petition. Key issues were the necessity for physical appearance exemptions and video conferencing for the petitio...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1794

Sankar Padam Thapa VS Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal

Dishonour of cheque – When cause of action arises due to alleged dishonour of cheque and complaint is initiated under NI Act, same is maintainable against Trustee who has signed cheque, without requir....

Headnote:

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Sections 138 and 141 – Dishonour of cheque – When cause of action arises due to alleged dishonour of cheque and complaint is initiated under NI Act, same is maintainable against Trustee who has signed cheque, without requirement to array Trust also as an accused – Trust is also not like a corporation which has a legal existence of its own and can appoint an agent...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1792

Rejanish K. V. VS K. Deepa

(1) Appointment as District Judge/Additional District Judge – Object of any process of selection for entry into a public service should be to secure the best and the most suitable person for the job –....

Headnote:

Per B.R. GAVAI, CJI [For himself and on behalf of ARAVIND KUMAR, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA and K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ.]
(A) Constitution of India – Article 233(2) – Appointment as District Judge/Additional District Judge – Object of any process of selection for entry into a public service should be to secure the best and the most suitable person for the job – Judicial Officers who have already compl...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9876

NARINDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

Subject: Criminal Law – Criminal Appeals

Keywords: conviction, dismissal, appellant, respondent, bail, application, sentence, hearing, jurisdiction

Appeals dismissed due to lack of merit and prior convictions upheld.

Headnote:

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals against the State of Haryana. The court heard the counsel for the parties and determined that no errors existed in the prior convictions. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as no case was made for entertaining them. The final verdict was that all pending applications would be disposed of.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9898

NEHA SETHI vs BHUVAN BARGOTRA

Subject: Civil – Family Law

Keywords: Transfer, Matrimonial Case, Code of Civil Procedure, Justice, Jurisdiction, Hearing, Petition, Relocation, Exemption, Video Conferencing

Transfer of matrimonial case mandated for the interests of justice, allowing proceedings to be relocated to a more appropriate jurisdiction.

Headnote:

This Transfer Petition was filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of a matrimonial case pending before the Principal District Judge Family Court, Jammu & Kashmir to the courts in Delhi. The court, after considering the totality of circumstances and finding it warranted in the interest of justice, allowed the transfer petition. The main issue revolved around t...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9874

PAYAL SHARMA AND ORS. vs KRISHNA DEVI

Subject: Transfer of Proceedings – Domestic Violence Act

Keywords: transfer, domestic violence, case management, jurisdiction, convenience, petition, petitioners, judicial magistrate, court, allowance

Transfer of proceedings where multiple cases are pending between parties is permissible to ensure convenience.

Headnote:

The petitioners seek transfer of a case under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indora to that of Amritsar, as there are two pending cases between the parties. Court finds a case for transfer, leading to the allowance of the petition. RESULT: The Transfer Petition is allowed.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9875

KINJAL DALAL SHAH vs AKSHAY KUMAR SHAH

Subject: Civil Law – Family Law

Keywords: transfer, jurisdiction, divorce, dependency, hearing, petition, family court, consolidation, proceedings, notice

Transfer of jurisdiction in divorce proceedings considered for convenience and necessity.

Headnote:

The statute concerning civil marriage dissolution provides a framework for transferring jurisdiction between courts. In this case, the petitioner seeks to transfer proceedings from the Hyderabad court to Ahmedabad due to the financial dependency on her parents. The court finds merit in the request as multiple cases are pending in Ahmedabad. The core issues involve transfer jurisdiction and the liv...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1784

Hind Samachar Ltd. (Delhi Unit) VS National Insurance Company Ltd.

Subject: Insurance Law – Motor Vehicle Insurance

Keywords: fake driving license, vicarious liability, insurance recovery, due diligence, negligence, collusion, appellate court, Motor Vehicles Act, claimants, owner's responsibility

Insurance companies must prove insured negligence or breach for recovery claims involving fake driving licenses; mere existence of a fake license is insufficient to establish liability.

Headnote:

(A) Motor Vehicles Act - Insurance claims - Breach of policy conditions and fake driving licenses - The appellant, truck owner, challenged the High Court's 'pay and recovery' order regarding liability due to the driver's fake driving license. The High Court found collusion between the owner and driver, attributing negligence to the owner. Licensed evidence and collusion established are insufficien...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9866

RAJINDER SINGH vs SWATI BHATIA

Subject: Civil – Family Law

Keywords: transfer, jurisdiction, Hindu Marriage Act, divorce, court efficiency, consolidation, proceedings, court orders, petition, Supreme Court

The court holds that jurisdiction should be consolidated for the efficient adjudication of matrimonial matters, enabling transfers based on prior orders.

Headnote:

The Transfer Petition seeks the transfer of proceedings in a divorce case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, citing previous transfer order. The Court finds the case suitable for transfer given the context and existing court orders. The issues framed relate to jurisdiction, with the court concluding it is appropriate to consolidate relevant matters in Mohali to ensure judicial efficiency.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9858

ALOK KUMAR & ANR. vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

Subject: Civil – Curative Petition

Keywords: Curative Petition, Dismissed, Legal Parameters, Oral Hearing, Supreme Court, Rupa Ashok Hurra, Case Law, Dismissal Reason, Final Decision, Judgment

The Supreme Court dismissed a curative petition for failing to meet established legal parameters, reinforcing existing jurisprudence on curative petitions.

Headnote:

In the case of Curative Petition (Civil) No. of 2025, the Supreme Court examined the parameters for such petitions as established in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., 2002 (4) SCC 388. The petition, seeking oral hearing, was rejected as no case was made out. The relevant legal issues framed concerned the viability of the curative petition within the bounds laid out by prior jurisprudence. T...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9857

N.MANIVANNAN & ORS. vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

Subject: Civil Law – Curative Petition

Keywords: delay, refiling, discharge, advocate, oral hearing, dismissal, legal parameters, curative petition, order, Supreme Court

The Court affirmed its discretion to dismiss a curative petition where no sufficient case is shown under established legal parameters.

Headnote:

In this curative petition, the Court condoned the delay in refiling and allowed the application for discharge of the Advocate on Record. However, the request for oral hearing was rejected. Ultimately, the Court determined that the Curative Petition was dismissed based on the standards set forth in previous decisions, particularly citing Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., leading to the dismi...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9855

SHYAMAL MALLICK vs MAMTA DAS & ANR.

Subject: Civil – Curative Petition

Keywords: curative, petition, dismissed, parameters, Supreme Court, Rupa Ashok Hurra, precedent, case, review, jurisdiction

The court reaffirmed the strict parameters for curative petitions as established in precedent.

Headnote:

In determining the Curative Petition, the Court examined the parameters established in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., and found that no case was made out for reconsideration. The dismissal was based on prior judgments that limited grounds for curative petitions. The court concluded that the Curative Petition is dismissed.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9859

ANOOP YADAV & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Subject: Civil – Review Petition

Keywords: Curative Petition, Supreme Court, dismissed, Rupa Ashok Hurra, legal precedent, parameters, insufficient grounds, final judgment, India, order

A Curative Petition must satisfy specific grounds as established in relevant case law for it to be considered.

Headnote:

The Supreme Court dismissed the Curative Petition based on lack of sufficient grounds, referencing the legal precedent in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra. The Court highlighted its decision as dismissing the petition under the parameters set forth in previous judgments. As a result, the Court's determination was to dismiss the Curative Petition accordingly.


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1771

Dharmrao Sharanappa Shabadi VS Syeda Arifa Parveen

(1) Status of relationship – Opinion evidence – It is open to Supreme Court to interfere with findings of fact given by High Court if High Court has acted perversely or otherwise improperly.
(2) Pe....

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India – Article 136 – Appeal by Special Leave – Re-appreciation of evidence is normally not undertaken by Supreme Court under Article 136 of Constitution of India – Re-appreciation is undertaken primarily to examine whether Trial Court and High Court have accurately recorded available findings – In a given case, reappreciation of evidence is not barred under Article 136 of Cons...


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9854

SACHIN SINGH & ORS. vs STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

Subject: Civil Law – Review Petitions

Keywords: Curative Petitions, Dismissal, Precedent, Parameters, Supreme Court, Review, Order, Judgment

Curative petitions must meet specific parameters established by precedent to be granted relief.

Headnote:

The Supreme Court examined the Curative Petitions under review petition parameters, following the precedent set in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr. The Court dismissed the petitions, asserting that no case was made out for curative relief. The judgment emphasized the necessity of meeting established parameters for such petitions.


Supreme(Online)(SC) 2025 9930

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS vs M/S JAIN RECYCLING PVT. LTD.

Subject: Civil – Taxation

Keywords: review petitions, delay, procedural defects, dismissed, merit, error apparent, court order, final judgment, taxation, income tax

Court dismissed review petitions for lack of merit and procedural defects, emphasizing no clear error on record.

Headnote:

In this case, the court examined the review petitions, identifying that defects had not been cured and a significant delay occurred. The petitions were dismissed for lack of merit, emphasizing there was no error apparent on the record. The central issue revolved around the procedural defects and delays in filing. The court's reasoned finding concluded that no merit warranted reconsideration of the...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1765

Vinishma Technologies Pvt. Ltd. VS State Of Chhattisgarh

Subject: Public Procurement – Tender Validity

Keywords: tender conditions, discrimination, violation, constitutional mandates, freedom to trade, public procurement, arbitrary restrictions, competition, local experience, sports kits

1) Government Contract – Tender – Doctrine of level playing field requires that gates of competition be opened to all who are equally placed.(2) Government Contract – Tender – Eligibility criteria men....

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India – Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) – Government Contract – Tender – Exclusion of competent suppliers from outside State – Government must have free hand in setting terms of tender and Court cannot strike down terms of tender prescribed by Authority merely because it feels some other terms in the tender would have been fairer, wiser or more logical – In the matter of formulating c...


Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top