Back
J.L.KAPUR, B.P.SINHA, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Razia Begum – Appellant
Versus
Sahebzadi Anwar Begum – Respondent
The core legal principle established in this case concerns the scope and discretion involved in adding parties to a suit under the relevant procedural rules. The court clarified that the decision to add parties, particularly respondents, is generally a matter of judicial discretion rather than initial jurisdiction, and must be exercised based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case (!) (!) .
Furthermore, the court emphasized that for a person to be added as a party, they must have a direct interest in the subject matter of the litigation, especially when the dispute involves rights or interests in property. However, when the litigation pertains to a declaration of status or legal character, the requirement of direct interest may be relaxed if the court finds that the inclusion of such parties would enable a more complete and effective adjudication of the controversy (!) (!) .
The court also distinguished between declarations of status under specific statutory provisions and property rights, noting that declarations concerning status can have far-reaching implications affecting not only the parties but also persons claiming through them, including future generations. Such declarations are not merely binding on the parties but can extend to persons claiming through them, provided the court exercises its discretion judiciously and with regard to the interests involved (!) (!) .
Additionally, the court highlighted that the exercise of discretion in adding parties should be based on whether their presence is necessary to effectually and completely settle all questions involved in the suit. The mere possibility that a declaration could impact the rights of others does not automatically justify their inclusion unless their involvement is essential for a comprehensive adjudication (!) (!) .
In summary, the principle underscores that the addition of parties in cases involving status or legal character is a matter of judicial discretion, guided by the necessity of their presence for a full and effective resolution of the dispute, rather than an automatic or initial jurisdictional requirement.
Judgment
B. P. SINHA, J. : This appeal by special leave is directed against the concurring judgment and orders of the courts below, allowing the intervention of respondents 1 and 2, and adding them as defendants 2 and 3, in the suit instituted by the appellant against her alleged husband, now respondent No. 3, who was the sole defendant in the suit as originally framed. The main question in controversy in this appeal, is the true construction of sub-r. (2) of R. 10 of O. 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and its application to the facts of this case, which are given below:
2. On 12-4-1957, the plaintiff - appellant in this Court - instituted the suit out of which this appeal arises against the third respondent who is the second son of His Exalted Highness the Nizam of Hyderabad, and who will, hereinafter be referred to as the Prince. In the plaint, she alleged that she is the lawfully married wife of the Prince, the marriage ceremony (Nikah) having been solemnized in accordance with the Shia Law, by a Shia Mujtahid on 19-10-1948. The plaintiff also averred that the issue of the marriage, were three daughters aged 8, 7 and 5 years; that the fact of the marriage was known to all person
**Analysis of the treatment of the cited decisions (all of which relate to *Razia Begum v. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum*, AIR 1958 SC 886)**
---
### \
**No case in the supplied list is shown to have been overruled, reversed, abrogated, or otherwise labelled "bad law."
The excerpts contain no words such as *overruled*, *reversed*, *overturned*, *bad law*, *disapproved*, or similar language that would indicate a negative treatment.
---
### \
| Treatment pattern | Cases (by reference number) | Rationale – why the case falls in this group |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| **Followed / Applied** (the decision is relied on, quoted, or used as authority) | **Virtually every entry** – e.g., 02700021569, 01500016177, INDKER00000486997, 02700046287, 00900003718, 02200023298, 02700024034, 02300021068, 02100053138, 01100022796, 01700008488, 00800003894, 00900002480, 01400013537, 02700001569, 00800004417, INDBOM00000130368, 00900008317, 00900008410, 00900034044, 02500148380, 01100020423, 01800000036, 02500039417, 00900010051, INDKER00000487230, 00900009956, 01100019806, 01800000436, 01400013901, 00900009577, 01400014007, 02500140472, 01701984017, 02200032464, 02300018622, 00900009498, 01100019065, 02200029134, 01100018590, 01701985149, 01400014191, 02300009033, 02100027164, 02100027163, 02300008912, 01701988288, 02100027425, 02300013250, 02300012427, 01500006954, 01100016343, 00900008583, 00800033528, 02200031747, 00100029634, 02200031965, 00900015651, 00900015665, 00100030044, 00100039349, 00100035223, 01100012968, 00900010340, 01300006633, 00900015709, 02300007170, 02200024384, 01400016644, 02500004490, 01700006993, 01100009522, 00300009050, 01100009860, 00900016295, 00100003592, 00900011813, 01100008526, 00100004045, 02300030826, 01100009057, 01702000429, 02700036305, 01100009318, 01100009382, 02500005993, 01100007504, 02700004981, 02700007895, 01100007793, 00300032369, 01800004509, INDJK00000003381, INDJK00000004367, 02100048070, 02700035898, 02700007767, 01100005677, 00900012750, 02100048037, 02100047948, 02100047753, 00300011210, 00900033324, 01100002629, 00300012424, 01800003366, 00900018633, 02000010258, 00100027162, 00400024486, 00400026817, 02500000044, 02500019075, 02000010514, 02000010628, 01100027463, 01100029870, 01100031325, 02100037963, 02200014817, 04200003351, 01400006220, 01400006378, 01100063560, 00300025652, 02100048409, INDKER00000078815, 02100062093, 02500029535, 02700015610, 02500053268, 00200039024, 01100034800, 01100035437, 01100063310, 01100063198, 01100046191, 02200017693, 00200044903, 02200031374, 04200001465, 00400045955, 02200017738, 01100039766, 04200001749, 00900037761, 01100040324, 02100115494, 00200046732, 01000005333, 02500077867, 02200018531, 00100057277, 02100118108, 02100122708, 01100045175, 00200048041, 02200018856, 02500078002, 02200019426, 02700035408, 00900038448, 02200019401, 02200019402, 01100056297, 02100127019, 02200019930, 02200019938, 02200020935, 02200020936, 02100123937, 02500090138, 00100059575, 02200020792, 02200021125, 02500080613, 00200049766, 00200049894, 01100058761, 00200049179, 00400061448, INDMP00000120732, 01000006670, 01800022383, 02400000672, 02000023840, 04200004705, 02000023839, 02200035146, 02200035151, 00400058730, 02200034846, 02500101224, 02500104963, 00400059332, 04300000141, 02300071730, 00200050761, 00100066508, 01500048951, 00100066613, 02600012163, 01000009386, 00400066345, 00200053393, INDKER00000488634, 00300048378, 01100068564, 01100068284, 02000031419, 00300049044, 02500110756, 00300050056, 04300050404, 02000033449, 00300050565, 00300050578, 00300051886, 00800053993, 00800053524, 00800053509, 00300050500, 00800055025, 04300003802, 00300052081, 00300052037, 00400071745, INDKAR00000032526, INDKAR00000049996, 00800054848, 01500054638, INDKAR00000061053, 00900050138, 01500054900, 00200059725, 00900050817, 00900050816, 04200005950, 04300051312, 00800056907, 01400037158, 02200037994, 02200037970, 04200006142) | The excerpts repeatedly state that the Supreme Court *"observed,"* *"laid down,"* *"held,"* *"decided,"* or that counsel *"relied on"* the decision. These are classic signals that the later judgments **followed** or **applied** the precedent. No contrary language is present. |
| **Distinguished / Not Followed** (the decision was noted but held inapplicable or "beside the point") | 00900009956, 01500006954, 02500148380, 02500140472, 01500006954 (again), 02500148380 (again) | Phrases such as "the case … is beside the point," "does not help the revisionists," or "the decision does not help …" indicate that the later court **distinguished** the precedent rather than following it. |
| **Unclear / Ambiguous treatment** | 02200023298 (mentions "laid down two important propositions of law" – could be either followed or merely noted), 02100027164 / 02100027163 (simply "brought to my notice" the principles) | These citations do not contain explicit language of acceptance or rejection; they merely refer to the case. Without a clear indicator, the treatment is **uncertain**. |
---
### \
| Reference | Why the treatment is uncertain |
|-----------|--------------------------------|
| 02200023298 | The excerpt says the Court "laid down two important propositions of law," but does not say whether the later case adopted them. |
| 02100027164, 02100027163 | The counsel "brought to notice" the principles; the judgment does not say whether they were applied or rejected. |
| 01800000036 (and similar "has placed reliance on" statements) | While reliance often implies following, it can also be a neutral citation. In the absence of explicit "held that" language, the exact treatment cannot be confirmed. |
---
**Summary**
**No overruled or reversed authority** is identified in the provided list.
The overwhelming majority of the citations treat *Razia Begum v. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum* as **good law** and are **followed/applied**.
A handful of entries **distinguish** the case or deem it **inapplicable**, and a few citations are **ambiguous** about their treatment.
**Source :** Mujtabai Begum VS Mehbub Rehman - Madhya Pradesh Unichirakutty Amma VS Krishnan Nair - Kerala Augustine v. Chundampatta Asari Sanku And Others - Kerala SARDAR NAGENDRA SINGH GARCHA VS JAIDEV SATPATHY - Madhya Pradesh Nagendra Singh VS Jaidev Satpathy - Madhya Pradesh TURNER MORRISON AND CO. LTD. VS HUNGERFORD INVESTMENT TRUST LTD. - Calcutta DAMODAR MAHAPATRA VS STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa Madhya Pradesh Motor Karmachari Sangh, Ujjain VS M. P. State Road Transport Corporation, Bairagarh - Madhya Pradesh Manmohan Singh VS Sat Narain - Punjab and Haryana R. Tulasi VS Hameed Bi - Madras B. K. KHANNA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED VS K. C. NAHAR - Delhi Hanuman VS Shakru - Rajasthan Bindeshwari Chaudhary VS Sheo Nandan Upadhya - Patna JALPAIGURI CINEMA CO. LTD. VS PROMOTHA NATH MUKHERJEE - Calcutta Kshitish Chandra Mitra VS Dewan Sheikh and others - Gauhati PANNE KHUSHALI VS JEEWANLAL MATHOO KHATIK - Madhya Pradesh Trilookchand VS Mohammad - Madhya Pradesh Ajoy Kumar Gupta VS State Of Bihar - Patna Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd (M/s.) v. Basilia M. Gomes and her husband and Another - Bombay SURENDRA NATH SARKAR VS MANATAB MONIAN - Calcutta GANESH CHANDRA BAG VS RASHBEHARI CHAKRABARTI - Calcutta Mukund Shah VS Golden Polyester Industries (Pvt. ) Ltd. - Calcutta Ram Kali VS Mahabir - Allahabad Bangali VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh Bashir Mohammad VS Rabiyabai - Madhya Pradesh SUBHASH CHANDER VS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI - Delhi BELI RAM VS SUNEHRU - Himachal Pradesh [SUKHDEO
VS PHOOL CHAND
](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500039417) - Allahabad Kishore Pustakalaya VS Ramdwariklal - Madhya Pradesh A. K. ROY VS J. C. ROY CHOUDHURY - Calcutta Lakshmikutty Amma v. Chandrasekharan Nair - Kerala SIKHA SINGH VS DINA CHAKRABARTY - Calcutta KHUSHI RAM VS LAL MAN - Delhi DALIP SINGH VS ROOP SINGH - Himachal Pradesh Hasen Ali and Others VS Solimuddin S. K. and Another - Gauhati Ganpat VS Laxminarain - Madhya Pradesh MOHAMMADBHAI SK. MOHSINBHOY VS TRUSTEES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF CALCUTTA - Calcutta Motoi Mia and others VS Abdul Haque and others - Gauhati Mahendras Kaur VS Hafiz Khalil - Allahabad Gouri Shanker VS Jabbar Singh - Rajasthan INDRAJIT DANDASENA VS MANGAL CHARAN DANDASENA - Orissa Surjit Kaur VS Chand Singh - Punjab and Haryana SHYAM BEHARI LOHAR VS RAM CHARAN LOHAR - Calcutta SATISH CHAND GUPTA VS SARVESH CHAND GUPTA - Delhi RAMA CHANDRA KAR VS BICHITRANANDA KAR - Orissa INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION VS AZIZ FATIMA HASNAIN - Delhi Vanmalidas VS Shyam Rani Kabra - Madhya Pradesh Durga Shanker VS Kanchan Bai - Rajasthan Abinash Chandra & Anr. VS Wazahat Hussain & Ors. - Gauhati Oswal Oil And Soap Industries VS Customs Excise And Gold Control Appellate Tribunal - Punjab and Haryana A. S. V. Varadachariar VS Sri Pounderikapuram Swami Ashram, Srirangam By Its Head Of Institution, Sri Gopala Desika Maha Desikan, Srirangam - Madras A. S. V. Varadachariar VS Sri Pounderikapuram Swami Ashram, Srirangam By Its Head Of Institution, Sri Gopala Desika Maha Desikan - Madras Krishan Lal VS Tek Chand - Punjab and Haryana Achalulal VS Surendra Kumar - Rajasthan V. R. Arunachalam Chettiar VS Vayinagaram - Madras Harbans Lal VS Central Bank Of India - Punjab and Haryana KARTAR SINGH VS KANHAI SINGH - Madhya Pradesh Hukam Chand (Dead) Reptd. By His Lrs VS Ram Lal - Punjab and Haryana Knanaya Catholic Congress VS Biju Uthup - Kerala SAVITRI DEVI VS SHANTI DEVI - Delhi HIRAN BALA DEBI VS PRODYUT KUMAR MONDAL - Calcutta Sivendra Kishore Bose VS Radharaman Mukherjee - Patna BANALATA PARIDA VS BANSHIDHAR DAS - Orissa Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal VS Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay - Supreme Court RABINDRA MOHAPATRA VS SOURI PRASAD MALLA - Orissa SAHADEB KUNDU VS JOGESH SHEKHAR MUKHOPADHYAY - Calcutta TERAI TEA CO. PVT. LTD. VS KUMKUM MITTAL - Calcutta New Redbank Tea Company Private LTD. VS Kumkum Mittal - Supreme Court Anil Kumar Singh VS SHIVNATH MISHRA ALIAS GADASA GURU - Supreme Court Anil Kumar Singh VS Shivnath Mishra Alias Gadasa Guru - Supreme Court MAHINDER AHUJA VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Delhi GREAT GOPALPUR TEA COMPANY LTD VS COLLECTOR AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR, JALPAIGURI - Calcutta NAVNITBHAI HARMANBHAI PATEL VS PATEL RAMESHBHAI ambalal - Gujarat TERAI OVERSEAS LIMITED VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - Calcutta Suresh Bala VS Rajbir Singh - Punjab and Haryana SABITA BEHERA VS PRAFULLA KUMAR DAS - Orissa Laxmanlal Jee Mandir VS Laxmiram Agarwalla and another - Gauhati MONIKA PLASTIC PIPES (P) LTD. , MUZAFFARNAGAR VS DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES, KANPUR - Allahabad Baijnath VS Ganga Devi - Rajasthan KUMARI HARPRIT KAUR VS SARDAR KANWALJIT SINGH - Delhi ASWATHAMMA VS H. M. VIJAYARAGHAVA - Karnataka SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGIES USA INC. VS SPECTRUM POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED - Delhi AMIYA KUMAR BASU VS PANKAJ KR. CHAKRABORTY - Calcutta Savitri Devi VS District Judge, Gorakhpur - Supreme Court KARAN SINGH NINAYAK VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta GOPAL MOHAN VADHERA VS JAGDISH RAI VADHERA - Delhi Balraj Taneja VS Sunil Madan - Supreme Court Bimla Devi VS Rakesh Gautam And Ors. - Punjab and Haryana SANJAY GUPTA VS KALA WATI - Delhi Rumani VS Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur - Rajasthan NIRMALA DHAR SINGH BAGHELA VS RANJIT SINGH AMAR SINGH DHUMAN - Madhya Pradesh PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH VS MAJOR K. V. KOHLI - Delhi PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH VS STATE OF DELHI - Delhi SUNIL KHAN VS ANUPAM HOUSING (P. ) LTD. - Allahabad STATE BANK OF INDIA VS GLAVKOSMOS - Delhi URMILA PATEL VS LAXMIBAI - Madhya Pradesh Urmila Patel VS Laxmibai - Madhya Pradesh OM PARKASH CHARAYA VS ASHOK KAMAL CAPITAL BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED - Delhi Lakshmamma VS Venugopal - Karnataka RAJINDER VS TARSEM CHAND - Himachal Pradesh All Kashmir Mini Bus Passengers Transport Federation v. State of J. and K. and Others - Jammu and Kashmir All Kashmir Mini Bus Passenger Transport Federation vs Shahanshah Transport Service Srinagar - Jammu and Kashmir S. Krishnaveni VS D. Rajammal - Madras SHEETAL SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SANSTHAN (MARYADIT) VS STATE OF M. P. - Madhya Pradesh Kanhaiyalal Negi VS Nagarpalik Nigam, Khandwa - Madhya Pradesh VIDHI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED VS BALJIT KAUR - Delhi PRADIP KR. CHATTERJEE VS REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY - Calcutta W. S. Nisha VS K. Padmanabhan - Madras W. S. Nisha VS K. Padmanabhan - Madras W. S. Nisha W/o K. Saleem VS K. Padmanabhan S/o Mr. Kalippa - Madras STATE OF KARNATAKA VS MUNIRAJU - Karnataka Bloom Field Tea Company Ltd. VS Janet Owner Johnston - Calcutta PREM LATA GUPTA VS DUNLOP INDIA LIMITED - Delhi ARUN KUMAR AGARWAL VS RADHA ARUN - Karnataka KALI RAM VS STATE OF H. P. - Himachal Pradesh LYONS CORPORATE MARKET LTD VS UMA GUPTA - Calcutta KAIRA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD VS RAISING MANGALBHAI PARMAR, - Gujarat PROBASISH DAS GUPTA VS JUTHIKA DAS GUPTA - Jharkhand Ruma Chakraborty VS Sudha Rani Banerjee - Supreme Court DEVCHAND CONSTRUCTIONS VS BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MORMUGAO - Bombay BERYL (Mrs. ) MURZELLO VS RAM CHANDRA BHAIRO MANE - Bombay SATYA NARAIN KAPOOR VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad SATYA NARAIN KAPOOR (DEAD) BY LRS VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad UNION BANK OF INDIA VS ANNAPURNA UDYOG - Jharkhand Union Bank of India VS Annapurna Udyog - Jharkhand GEETA BHARGAVA VS PUR POLYURETHANE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD - Delhi ASSOCIA NON FOR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH VS INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYSTS OF INDIA - Delhi PUR POLYURETHANE PRODUCTS P. LTD. VS GEETA BHARGAVA - Delhi N. K. Pushpam Achi VS K. Rajakumar & Others - Madras Debendra Swain VS State of Orissa - Orissa Pioneer Co-operative Market Ltd. VS Mustt. Mehrun Nessa - Current Civil Cases Pioneer Co-operative Market Ltd. VS Mustt. Mehrun Nessa - Gauhati Somnath Banerjee VS Arati Rani Chakraborty - Gauhati S. N. Arora VS Brokers & Brokers Pvt. Ltd. - Delhi V. Chandrashekaraiah VS Puttamma - Karnataka Robust Hotels P VS E. I. H. Limited - Madras M.N.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR Vs VIJAYAN MENON - Kerala R. Suryanarayanan VS Tmt. Kodai Nayagi - Madras RAVINDRA GIRI GOSWAMI VS DARAGANJ RAM LEELA COMMITTEE, DARAGANJ, ALLAHABAD - Allahabad Jaideep Shah VS Rashmi Shah ' Miss Rashmi Vyas - Madhya Pradesh PICASSO DIGITAL MEDIA PRIVATE LTD. VS ARUN SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRMAN VAS GROUP - Allahabad Taste Hotels VS Medisetty Jayasri - Andhra Pradesh V. N. Verma VS Veena Mahajan - Delhi Richard Fernandes VS Laila Kabir Fernandes - Delhi Harish Kumar Dua VS Narender Kumar Dua - Delhi NAND LAL VS BAKSHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION - Delhi Kamlesh Sharma @ Kamlesh Kumari VS Satya Devi - Delhi Droupadi Jain VS Ananda Ku. Agrawal - Orissa Syed Mujtaba Alli VS D2 Late Nawab Mazharuddin Khan - Andhra Pradesh LAXMIKANTA KAR VS SURENDRA PAUL - Orissa Pankaj Unit No. 1 Housing Development Company Pvt. Ltd. VS Oshiwara Land Development Company Pvt. Ltd. - Current Civil Cases Pankaj Unit No. 1 Housing Development Company Private Limited VS Oshiwara Land Development Company Private Limited - Bombay Bhagirathi Mahalik VS Markanda Barik - Orissa Sicpa India Private Ltd. VS Kapil Kumar - Delhi Anil Kumar VS Ashok Kumar - Current Civil Cases Magma Leasing Ltd. VS Keshava Nandan Sahaya - Calcutta Inder Mohan Singh VS Sube Singh - Delhi Saraswathi VS P. S. Swarnalatha - Madras Pelimelly Ramesh VS E. Sravan Kumar - Andhra Pradesh Manohar Shesh VS Shakuntala Devi - Chhattisgarh NEELU @ NILESH PANDEY VS CHABBI DEVI - Allahabad Mirza Golam Jelani Baig VS Prabir Kumar Samal - Orissa Poonam VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court P. Govindasamy VS Manickam - Madras P. Govindasamy VS Manickam - Madras European Motor Works Private Limited VS ICICI Bank Limited - Delhi Guttikonda Narasimha Rao VS Raghunath Mittal - Andhra Pradesh Ramakrushna Mudra VS Raghunath Mudra - Orissa HAIDER ALI KAZIM @ ASAD KAZIM VS MOHAMMAD IQBAL MAHMOOD KAZIM - Allahabad Bansidhar Nayak (Dead) VS Priya Ranjan Mohanty - Orissa Sharmila Tagore VS Saidullah Khan - Madhya Pradesh Ravi Udyog Private Limited VS S. G. Projects Ltd. - Calcutta Banchhanidhi Patra VS Bhagabat Prasad Panda - Orissa Deepak Singh VS Sandhyarani Giri - Orissa Globe Ground India Employees Union VS Lufthansa German Airlines - Delhi V. VEERANAN VS VARADHARAJAN - Madras Pramila Dash VS Basanti Dash - Orissa Pritish Kumar Giri VS Rusuni Mohanta - Orissa Sudarsan Sahu VS Kuni Sahu - Orissa Sabitri Satapathy VS Notified Area Council - Orissa M. Srinivasan VS M. V. Mohammed - Madras Amit Saxena VS Addl. Registrar Law Co-operative Societies - Allahabad K. S. Varghese VS St. Peter's & Paul's Syrian Orth. - Supreme Court Akshaya Kumar Mishra VS Ashok Kumar Mishra - Orissa Meera Patra VS Rekha Pradhan - Orissa VIJAY PRAKASH CHAURASIA VS OM PRAKASH CHAURASIA - Allahabad Suryadevara Amit Nagendra VS S. Ramachandra Rao - Andhra Pradesh Mir Akber Ali Khan VS Princess Shafiya Sakina - Andhra Pradesh Ankur Mutreja VS BSES Yamuna Power Limited (BYPL) - Delhi Manepalli Mohan Rao S/o. Krishna Rao VS Jakkam Sunitha - Andhra Pradesh Rajnish Kumar Jain VS Thane Municipal Corporation - Bombay Smt.Mangai Bai and others vs Smt.Hansi Bai alias Hasu Bai and others - Madhya Pradesh Bhaktvatsal Singh Rajput S/o Shri Jagdish Singh VS Vandana Rajput W/o Bhaktvatsal Singh Rajput - Chhattisgarh Ravinder Kumar Bansal VS Pankaj Gupta - Himachal Pradesh Chetan Sharma, Son of Late Harihar Sharma VS Januki Pradhan, ife of Mr. R. K. Pradhan - Sikkim Subhendu Basu son of late Rati Nath Basu VS Sumitra Singh wife of late Sachidanand Singh - Jharkhand Subhendu Basu VS Sumitra Singh - Current Civil Cases Castron Technologies Ltd. VS Damodar Valley Corporation through its Chairman - Jharkhand Amina Bibi VS Sk. Md. Hanif - Orissa Khuswari Begum VS SK. Piru - Orissa K. RAHEJA CORP PVT LTD. VS MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. - Bombay Ananta Rout VS Kanduri Charan Rout - Orissa RAM NARESH SINGH VS SHARAD KUMARI - Allahabad Chauthi Ram VS Ram Chandra - Allahabad Ashok Dashrath Rana VS Edit Ii Production Binaifer Sanjay Kohli - Bombay Future Builders Co-Op Society Rep. , by its President Mufaddal Javawala VS S. Malla Reddy - Telangana Bimlesh VS Bed Ram - Punjab and Haryana Ravulapalli Yallamandamma, D/o Late Nasaraiah VS Borigorla Venkaiah, S/o Peda Yalamandaiah, Hindu - Andhra Pradesh Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. VS Regency Mahavir Properties - Supreme Court John Numpeli Junior Advocate, Son Of John Numpeli VS State Of Kerala - Kerala Satish Chander Ahuja VS Sneha Ahuja - Supreme Court Seema Gupta VS Manoj Kumar - Uttarakhand Superior Society of Yeshu Samaj Catholic Mission Jashpur VS Isha Bela Lakda, W/o Late Ignesh Lakda - Chhattisgarh Manoj Brijlal Kapoor VS Khandelwal Laboratories Pvt Ltd And Anr - Bombay Sayana Sudhakar VS Muthyalamma Temple Committee - Andhra Pradesh Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. Prakasan - Kerala SAPL-GCC JV, REPRESENTED BY ITS PA HOLDER, SRI. D V RAMAN VS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINSTRY OF PORTS, SHIPPING AND WATERWAYS TRANSPORT, BHAWAN1 PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - Karnataka Ravneet Kaur VS Prithpal Singh Dhingra - Delhi Ravneet Kaur VS Prithpal Singh Dhingra - Delhi State of Jharkhand VS Bipin Bihari Singh, S/o Late T. R. Singh - Jharkhand G. Varadaraju VS Union of India, Rep by Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice New Delhi-1 - Karnataka Priyanka VS State of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies LKO. - Allahabad H. ramachandraiah VS State of Karnataka - Karnataka Virender Kumar Singhal VS Shaik Rahamathulla - Telangana Aastha Constructions, through its Proprietor K. K. Singh VS State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Water Resources - Jharkhand B. C. Lokesh S/o Late Chikkamniyappa VS State of Karnataka - Karnataka Joseph Raj, S/O Shantappa VS State Of Karnataka - Karnataka D. L. Kannan VS Ambarish Reddy - Karnataka Manni Bibi @ Mani Bibi W/o Abid Hussain VS Mobina Khatoon W/o Late Anul Haque - Patna Shobhan Mandal VS State of Bihar - Patna Manni Bibi @ Mani Bibi VS Mobina Khatoon - Patna Amruthesh N. P. , S/o. Late N. C. Puttuswamy VS State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Chief Secretary - Karnataka Ratan Kumar Sarawgi, son of Late Ram Prasad Sarawgi alias Murlidhar Sarawgi VS Vishwanath Sarawgi alias Murlidhar Sarawgi, son of late Ram Prasad Sarawgi - Patna Munirunnisa Begum VS Pilli Mallaiah - Telangana Narayanaswamy VS State of Karnataka - Karnataka M. Rajesh VS State of Karnataka - Karnataka Ashok Babulal Avasthi VS Munna Nizamuddin Khan - Bombay ARUN KUMAR K. S. vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK - Karnataka SMT. MAHADEVAMMA vs THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD - Karnataka Baby Devi VS State of Bihar - Patna Rathnamani, W/o. Late K. Ramankutty VS K. P. Parameswaran, S/o. Padmanabha Iyer - Kerala SMT. D. SUMA vs SMT. YASHODAMMA - Karnataka AD Electrosteel Co. Private Limited VS Greco International Limited - Calcutta Sebastian Varkey, S/o. Late Varkey VS P. V. Joseph, S/o. Varkey - Kerala Navaratna Estates, Visakhapatnam VS Kari Anasuya - Andhra Pradesh Meenakshi Goenka VS Canon Properties Private Limited - Calcutta Meenakshi Goenka VS Manoj Kumar Bhagat - Calcutta Mudireddydivya VS Sulktisivarama Reddy - Current Civil Cases Mudireddy Divya vs Sulkti Sivarama Reddy - Telangana Naresh Jha VS Chandan Kumar - Patna Anowaruddin Wakf Estate vs Bipin Dey - Gauhati Bibhu Prasanna Mohapatra vs Dharmendra Pradhan - Orissa Union of India vs K. Manoj Patra - Orissa Union of India VS K. Manoj Patra - Current Civil Cases
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
